Illinois - Coaches threaten to boycott game

johnnyonthespot

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 6, 2002
1,459
18
38
45
Cottonwood Heights, UT
Three Illinois coaches threaten boycott unless contract issues resolved

It already was among the strangest bowls in the world.

Illinois (6-6) enters the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl on Saturday with a six-game losing streak, which might be unprecedented for a bowl team. UCLA (6-7) needed a waiver from the NCAA to play in a bowl with a losing record.

And the game, which pits two teams that have fired their coaches, keeps getting stranger.

Illinois athletic director Mike Thomas said Friday he was unaware of a threat by four assistant coaches to boycott the game if the university doesn?t resolve the exit terms of their contracts.

Offensive line coach Joe Gilbert told Sports Illustrated?s website that he, offensive coordinator Jeff Brohm and tight ends coach Chip Long are considering not coaching.

??If they want the bowl game to be coached,?? Gilbert said, ??they better decide they want to treat us the right way.??

The coaches reportedly are upset that a late change to their contracts ? they didn?t notice it before signing ? eliminates what would have been a full year of severance.

The situation is adding to the headaches for interim coach Vic Koenning, who?s trying to stay out of the controversy.

??If they don?t [coach], we?ll figure out what the next thing is,?? Koenning said. ??I?m not going to worry about something that hasn?t happened yet. I?m trying to worry about how we?re going to stop No. 8 and No. 83 and stay in our gaps.??

No. 8 is junior tight end Joseph Fauria, who has six touchdown catches, the most by a UCLA receiver since 2005. No. 83 is senior receiver Nelson Rosario, who?s fifth in the school record book in career catches (143) and receiving yards (2,307).

Koenning, who understood and accepted the terms of his contract when it was renewed last offseason, offered this explanation of the dispute.

??Would some of these guys have come here with a one-year contract? No,?? Koenning said. ??We didn?t realize we didn?t have two-year contracts until we were released. Something that wasn?t in the original contract got put in, and we didn?t go back and re-read them because we assumed things.??

Even without the contract squabble, the game has many unusual features. The name might sound odd, but it?s dedicated to a noble cause. More than 120,000 meals were donated to needy people in the Bay Area last year.

In addition, it?s played at AT&T Park, home of the San Francisco Giants. So Illinois will play in a baseball stadium for the second consecutive season. The Illini routed Northwestern 48-27 last year at Wrigley Field, where both offenses were headed westbound because of safety concerns about the right-field wall.

??That was my first question. I asked about the two-end-zone thing,?? said A.J. Jenkins, Illinois? All-Big Ten receiver.

??Hopefully, he has to worry about it,?? quarterback Nathan Scheelhaase said. ??If he?s trying to catch a lot of balls in the end zone, that?ll be a good sign for us.??

Kidding aside, the Illini, whose last victory came Oct. 8 at Indiana, are very serious about making the most of this opportunity.

Besides ending a troubled *season on a positive note, a victory would give Illinois a winning *
season and its first back-to-back bowl wins. The Illini defeated Baylor 38-14 in the Texas Bowl
last season.

??It?s exciting to have another chance to prove we?re still a good team,?? freshman running back Donovonn Young said. ??We?ve had our blunders, but we were 6-0. This is a chance to show people we?re still the Fighting Illini that won six in a row.??
 

johnnyonthespot

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 6, 2002
1,459
18
38
45
Cottonwood Heights, UT
This has to be one of the hardest games to cap - so much going on off the field who knows how it will effect the performance on the field. And how do you possibly know how well 2 interim coaches will do in preparing their teams?

On a non-game-related note, this is a really stupid move by these coaches. In the grand scheme of things, a loss in the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl won't mean much for the Illinois program. But causing a big distraction and potential embarrassment for your team on your way out is definitely not a smart career move. Leaving a job with class and quiet dignity may not always be noted and rewarded, but failing to do so almost always is.

Personally, this latest distraction may be the final straw for Illinois. It's just hard to imagine they will be able to put all this behind them and play a solid game. The offense was already inept the last 2 months so it's hard to imagine that having 3 offensive coaches whose minds are clearly on things other than the game are going to have them ready. Then again, a big criticism of Zook was that he handcuffed the offense with his unimaginative playcalling so it's also possible that less structure is just what Scheelhause and Co need. Given the situation, there's a huge opportunity for both teams to do a lot of new things that the opponent has no film on. Of course, making drastic changes at this stage in the season could just as easily be disastrous as beneficial.

Here was some other information I found useful from an LA Times article. Incoming UCLA coach Jim Mora has largely just been working on the transition behind the scenes. That has not been the case for incoming Illinois coach Tim Beckman:

"Illinois players can say the same about showing off for Tim Beckman, who was hired after Ron Zook was fired in November. But Beckman has been on the scene in Champaign, watching practice and talking with underclassmen the last two weeks."

This, combined with this latest distraction, tells me that the mind of Illinois and its players is already on next season and not on the game in front of them. That rarely works out well in a bowl game.

My gut is to take UCLA +3 in this game. However, there's probably a much better move in this game. To quote fellow MJ'er bleedingpurple - "This is the easiest game of the year - pass."
 

loophole

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 14, 1999
4,353
84
48
nc
have to wonder how much effort these guys have put into pregame preparation. as far as professionality goes, if my employer made a last minute covert change to the terms of my contract without disclosing it, so that i would sign it, i would light the place on fire. where were these guys agents and attorneys?
 

loophole

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 14, 1999
4,353
84
48
nc
cie, these contracts are fairly lengthly and technical, full of legalese. i'm reasonably sure most if not all of them relied on someone elses representation and interpretation.
 

johnnyonthespot

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 6, 2002
1,459
18
38
45
Cottonwood Heights, UT
where were these guys agents and attorneys?

That's exactly right. That's the whole reason you have an agent/attorney review a contract. Plus if it was removed from all of their contracts how did not one of them (or their attorneys) notice? If it really was done covertly by the university then that is bush league. But my guess is that these coaches did know about it and didn't really care when they signed it because they didn't think they'd really be let go this season (after all they were coming off of a bowl victory with almost the whole offense coming back - it was going to be a great season!).

Regardless, unless Illinois literally swapped out versions of the contract at the signing table without telling them (something I find very hard to believe) the coaches' issue should be with their attorneys (or themselves if they didn't have an attorney). There are lots of arcane terms in contracts but you would think that compensation and terms of termination would be the bare minimum that you'd be familiar with before signing.

On a side note, why should they get a year's severance? When I got laid off I got 4 weeks and considered myself lucky to get that. Unless you're a VP, that's all you get.
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
cie, these contracts are fairly lengthly and technical, full of legalese. i'm reasonably sure most if not all of them relied on someone elses representation and interpretation.

Exactly. That's what I mean. My atty reviews and advises all of my client contracts, including renewals. This has me thinking that I may rely on him more than i should. Looks like these guys learned that the hard way.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top