so i'm reading about rios, the stripper/runner not the comeback pitcher (though that's a great story)
the story is at <a href="http://espn.go.com/magazine/vol4no18rios.html">http://espn.go.com/magazine/vol4no18rios.html</a> and if you click on the story on the right called eye candy you get a popup window with some nice shots.
now i'm 31 and any picture of a college girl at this age in my life is simply irresistable (I still cant be in the same room alone with my nubile 21 year old sister in law for longer than five minutes before I have to leave) and I've got a runner friend who's been following the story but isn't web savy so I figure I'll download em for em.
now first off, I think she should be allowed to do both (opinions?).
I mean, thank goodness for strippers. they provide a valuable service, in a safe environment. and anybody who says that the women are exploited by doing this obviously hasn't ever been to a strip club as it's the schmucks like me throwin singles what's exploited (image of jim from american pie on morning after, she used me, alright she used me
).
anyway i look at the files i've just downloaded and notice there is a 5 missing in the sequence. so i view source, figure out where the file should be and go <a href="http://espn.go.com/i/magazine/4_18/4_18_rios_5.jpg">http://espn.go.com/i/magazine/4_18/4_18_rios_5.jpg</a>
sure enough, there it is. pretty smoking intense photo. but i'm wondering, obviously this pic came very close to being included in that article but somebody pulled it at the last minute. wonder who and why and was it really necessary. also wonder what photos were shot that never enen made it to the server
the story is at <a href="http://espn.go.com/magazine/vol4no18rios.html">http://espn.go.com/magazine/vol4no18rios.html</a> and if you click on the story on the right called eye candy you get a popup window with some nice shots.
now i'm 31 and any picture of a college girl at this age in my life is simply irresistable (I still cant be in the same room alone with my nubile 21 year old sister in law for longer than five minutes before I have to leave) and I've got a runner friend who's been following the story but isn't web savy so I figure I'll download em for em.
now first off, I think she should be allowed to do both (opinions?).
I mean, thank goodness for strippers. they provide a valuable service, in a safe environment. and anybody who says that the women are exploited by doing this obviously hasn't ever been to a strip club as it's the schmucks like me throwin singles what's exploited (image of jim from american pie on morning after, she used me, alright she used me
anyway i look at the files i've just downloaded and notice there is a 5 missing in the sequence. so i view source, figure out where the file should be and go <a href="http://espn.go.com/i/magazine/4_18/4_18_rios_5.jpg">http://espn.go.com/i/magazine/4_18/4_18_rios_5.jpg</a>
sure enough, there it is. pretty smoking intense photo. but i'm wondering, obviously this pic came very close to being included in that article but somebody pulled it at the last minute. wonder who and why and was it really necessary. also wonder what photos were shot that never enen made it to the server
