LAC Under 2h?

[Scrubber]

Anyone likes it?

 

[HighFlyingKilla]

Bad number. Game would have to stay under 177.

 

[Scrubber]

seems to low,, better stay out...

 

[Scrubber]

High,
R U playing?

 

[HighFlyingKilla]

Laying off.

 

[ivabign]

Bad number. Game would have to stay under 177.

What do you mean? Bad number - don't think it stays that low?

 

[HighFlyingKilla]

17.5 points under the closing total.

 

[ivabign]

That's a big number - but not totally uncommon.

 

[Scrubber]

I ended playing over 49 TT LAC
Lets see!

 

[HighFlyingKilla]

The horrible FG% is the reason the score is low. Lots of fg attempts so the pace is there for the over.

Dammit I forgot that and wanted to play the over.:facepalm:

 

[Scrubber]

Yeap, it look like kids ball... hope they get back to track!

 

[ivabign]

three games tonight had first half totals that ended up in the 80's - two of them had 2nd half scores in the 100's - the only exception was Memphis/OKC and that score was 97 points (with an OT period!) But, hey - that's Memphis - one of the best defenses in the NBA.

 

[HighFlyingKilla]

three games tonight had first half totals that ended up in the 80's - two of them had 2nd half scores in the 100's - the only exception was Memphis/OKC and that score was 97 points (with an OT period!) But, hey - that's Memphis - one of the best defenses in the NBA.

When ever the score is real low in the 1st half due to poor fg%. I always play over 2nd half especially when the total 10 pts or more off the closing number.

 

[Scrubber]

they are starting to look like the first half... man!

 

[ivabign]

Looks like under was the right call.....

 

[Scrubber]

Yeap, but couldn?t pull it....

I had my TT over, so i'm glad...

 

[HighFlyingKilla]

Sure was. I just hate playing unders when the numbers are off like that.