LIBERAL LIES ABOUT HALLIBURTON BITE THE DUST

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
89
CORCORAN, CA
STEVIE D on Halliburton: "And you might have just maybe hit on the whole reason for the Occupation of Iraq."

:fingerc: Manson wears their dissent like a badge of honor! :fingerc:

You want to make yourself depressed? Just log right onto the Madjack's political chatroom. Never has the internet seen so many defeatist liberal crybabies. Man, what a shitty way to live...angry 24/7.

Sorry that I no longer visit this website...but this messageboard is ruined by the far left wackos who spend every waking moment thrashing on Bush and critisizing our country. They show no patriotism whatsoever - only complaining 24/7. They wake up, not even taking a piss, and they run over to their computers and vent their desperate frustrations, just dying inside for some needed attention. We all know who they are....and they are priceless. :D

Didn't you guys read Al Zarqawi's letter? I mean...we are winning this war!! I know American military success is bad news for the liberals, but thank god all they can do is sit on the sidelines with their thumb up their ass and whine like defeatist crybabies.


anyways.....to Halliburton....

this is from FACTCHECK.ORG, have fun and God Bless America!! :sadwave:

A John Kerry ad implies Cheney has a financial interest in Halliburton and is profiting from the company's contracts in Iraq. The fact is, Cheney doesn't gain a penny from Halliburton's contracts, and almost certainly won't lose even if Halliburton goes bankrupt.

The ad claims Cheney got $2 million from Halliburton "as vice president," which is false. Actually, nearly $1.6 million of that was paid before Cheney took office. More importantly, all of it was earned before he was a candidate, when he was the company's chief executive.


Analysis



A Kerry ad released Sept 17 once again attacks Cheney's ties to Halliburton, implying that Cheney is profiting from the company's contracts in Iraq. That's false.



The ad isn't subtle. It says, "As vice president, Dick Cheney received $2 million from Halliburton. Halliburton got billions in no bid contracts in Iraq. Dick Cheney got $2 million. What did we get?" And it implies that Cheney lied to the public when he said in a TV interview that "I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind."

But as we document here, Cheney has insulated himself financially from whatever might happen to Halliburton. The Kerry ad misstates the facts.

$2 Million

To start, the $2 million figure is wrong. It is true that Cheney has received just under $2 million from Halliburton since his election, but nearly $1.6 million of that total was paid before Cheney actually took office on Jan. 20, 2001. Saying Cheney got that much "as vice president" is simply false.

We asked Cheney's personal attorney to document that, and he did, supplying several documents never released publicly before:

A Halliburton pay statement dated Jan 2, 2001 shows just under $147,579 was paid that day as "elect defrl payou," meaning payout of salary from the company's Elective Deferral Plan. That was salary Cheney had earned in 1999, but which he had chosen previously to receive in five installments spread over five years.
Another pay statement dated Jan. 18 shows $1,451,398 was paid that day under the company's "Incentive Plan C" for senior executives. That was Cheney's incentive compensation -- bonus money -- paid on the basis of the company's performance in 2000. Cheney had formally resigned from the company the previous September to campaign full time, but the amount of his bonus couldn't be calculated until the full year's financial results were known.
Cheney's personal financial disclosure forms, together with the pay statements just mentioned, show that Cheney has received $398,548 in deferred salary from Halliburton "as vice president." And of course, all of that is money he earned when he was the company's chief executive officer. Cheney was due to receive another payment in 2004, and a final payment in 2005.

The Kerry ad isn't the only place the false $2 million figure appears. The Democratic National Committee also gets it wrong on their website. The dates of the Halliburton payments don't appear on Cheney's personal financial disclosure form from 2001, and the DNC assumed -- incorrectly as we have shown -- that all the 2001 payment were made after he took office.

Deferred Salary

The $398,548 Halliburton has paid to Cheney while in office is all deferred compensation, a common practice that high-salaried executives use to reduce their tax bills by spreading income over several years. In Cheney's case, he signed a Halliburton form in December of 1998 choosing to have 50% of his salary for the next year, and 90% of any bonus money for that year, spread out over five years. (As it turned out, there was no bonus for 1999.) We asked Cheney's personal attorney to document the deferral agreement as well, and he supplied us with a copy of the form , posted here publicly for the first time.

Legally, Halliburton can't increase or reduce the amount of the deferred compensation no matter what Cheney does as vice president. So Cheney's deferred payments from Halliburton wouldn't increase no matter how much money the company makes, or how many government contracts it receives.

On the other hand, there is a possibility that if the company went bankrupt it would be unable to pay. That raises the theoretical possibility of a conflict of interest -- if the public interest somehow demanded that Cheney take action that would hurt Halliburton it could conceivably end up costing him money personally. So to insulate himself from that possible conflict, Cheney purchased an insurance policy (which cost him$14,903) that promises to pay him all the deferred compensation that Halliburton owes him even if the company goes bust and refuses to pay. The policy does contain escape clauses allowing the insurance company to refuse payment in the unlikely events that Cheney files a claim resulting "directly or indirectly" from a change in law or regulation, or from a "prepackaged" bankruptcy in which creditors agree on terms prior to filing. But otherwise it ensures Cheney will get what Halliburton owes him should it go under.

Cheney aides supplied a copy of that policy to us -- blacking out only some personal information about Cheney -- which we have posted here publicly for the first time.

Stock Options

That still would leave the possibility that Cheney could profit from his Halliburton stock options if the company's stock rises in value. However, Cheney and his wife Lynne have assigned any future profits from their stock options in Halliburton and several other companies to charity. And we're not just taking the Cheney's word for this -- we asked for a copy of the legal agreement they signed, which we post here publicly for the first time.

The "Gift Trust Agreement" the Cheney's signed two days before he took office turns over power of attorney to a trust administrator to sell the options at some future time and to give the after-tax profits to three charities. The agreement specifies that 40% will go to the University of Wyoming (Cheney's home state), 40% will go to George Washington University's medical faculty to be used for tax-exempt charitable purposes, and 20% will go to Capital Partners for Education , a charity that provides financial aid for low-income students in Washington, DC to attend private and religious schools.

The agreement states that it is "irrevocable and may not be terminated, waived or amended," so the Cheney's can't take back their options later.

The options owned by the Cheney's have been valued at nearly $8 million, his attorney says. Such valuations are rough estimates only -- the actual value will depend on what happens to stock prices in the future, which of course can't be known beforehand. But it is clear that giving up rights to the future profits constitutes a significant financial sacrifice, and a sizeable donation to the chosen charities.
 
Last edited:

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
89
CORCORAN, CA
Buddy it would go right over your head anyways even if you could read it. Thanks for being unable to debate facts. It's like a 3rd grade classroom in here. My exact point proven. :mj06:
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,421
128
63
Bowling Green Ky
More simply stated---Kerry who stiffed charity for zilch on tax return--is doging man that has given millions and continues to give millions.

---and you have the DNC and liberal blog sites supporting it--but worse their readers are lapping it up.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
71
Boston
Welcome back Chuck. Dogs, what does Kerry's tax return have to do with this? Talk about unable to debate facts! Bbbbbbut Clinton!
Manson, you neocon, kool aid drinking, moron. WE WON THE WAR!!!! Remember. they had no weapons to use against us. The War took about three weeks. It is the OCCUPATION OF IRAQ that is killing us. How many must die, how many maimed, half a trillion dollars so far defending who? Haliburton! who can't get the job done. 80% Iraqi unemployment and Haliburton can't get the job done.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
I'll shorten my usual response and put it this way.

1. See Dick become a Senator.
2. See Dick be named Secretary of Defense.
3. See Dick award contracts to Halliburton.
4. See Dick named CEO by Halliburton and make a ton of money.
5. See Dick get paid by Halliburton to head VP Search committee.
6. See Dick name himself as best candidate for VP.
7. See Dick become VP.
8. See Dick decide to go to war in an oil-based country that did not attack us.
9. See Dick oversee billions in taxpayer money going to Halliburton.
10. See Halliburton overcharge taxpayers and charge for work not done. Twice.
11. See Dick oversee additional billions in taxpayer money going to Halliburton despite #10.
12. See Dick donate a lot of money to charity partially because Halliburton stock skyrockets during his administrations run. Actually, this is not all bad. At least Dick didn't say his charitable contribution had to go directly to Neil Bush's software company, like Dubbya's mama did.
13. See neocons try to justify situation as nothing more than Dick being a good charitable citizen.
14. See Jane (Fonda) say all that was wrong. (I threw that in as an extra...)

I want to be a dick, methinks.
 

ctownguy

Life is Good
Forum Member
Jul 27, 2000
3,065
16
0
SoCal
CHARLESMANSON said:

You want to make yourself depressed? Just log right onto the Madjack's political chatroom. Never has the internet seen so many defeatist liberal crybabies. Man, what a shitty way to live...angry 24/7.

Sorry that I no longer visit this website...but this messageboard is ruined by the far left wackos who spend every waking moment thrashing on Bush and critisizing our country. They show no patriotism whatsoever - only complaining 24/7. They wake up, not even taking a piss, and they run over to their computers and vent their desperate frustrations, just dying inside for some needed attention. We all know who they are....and they are priceless. :D

Didn't you guys read Al Zarqawi's letter? I mean...we are winning this war!! I know American military success is bad news for the liberals, but thank god all they can do is sit on the sidelines with their thumb up their ass and whine like defeatist crybabies.


Couldn't have expressed it any better. I love this website and have the passed 6 years, but this political forum has turned into just what you described. Populated by a majority of whinny, defeatist, crybaby loser left wing wackos, and yes you know who you are.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
ctownguy said:
Couldn't have expressed it any better. I love this website and have the passed 6 years, but this political forum has turned into just what you described. Populated by a majority of whinny, defeatist, crybaby loser left wing wackos, and yes you know who you are.

And I thought we were in the minority, to hear some tell it. Cool. Nice to be the majority party now...

:moon:
 

ctownguy

Life is Good
Forum Member
Jul 27, 2000
3,065
16
0
SoCal
Chadman said:
And I thought we were in the minority, to hear some tell it. Cool. Nice to be the majority party now...

:moon:

Yes you are on this site, but thank goodness not in the real world :mj07: :142smilie
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,421
128
63
Bowling Green Ky
A--Cheney has not profited from war via Halibuton and really doesn't need the money.
B: regardless of who was in office Haliburton would have been rceived same contracts (no bid) as they did in prior adminisrtation.

If your going to put confidence in blog sites with opinion over several articles here stating references and sources --theres not much anyone can do about it.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Let me get this straight, Dogs. You honestly believe that neither Dick Cheney nor Halliburton have profited from his association with the company and as Secretary of Defense and Vice President? You honestly believe that?
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
New documents suggest Pentagon lied about Cheney's role in awarding no-bid contract to Halliburton in 2003
15 June, 2006

WASHINGTON -- Newly-released government documents indicate the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may have publicly lied about Vice President Dick Cheney's role in awarding a $7 billion no-bid Iraqi oil reconstruction contract to Halliburton in the weeks preceding the March 2003 invasion, the conservative activist group Judicial Watch disclosed today.

Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Judicial Watch found an internal USACE email from April 2003 explaining that USACE Chief Counsel, Robert Andersen, told the 60 Minutes television program that, "There was no contact whatsoever (with the VP office)" in awarding the oil contract to Halliburton.

But this information contradicts another email uncovered by Judicial Watch in 2004. The email, dated March 5, 2003, sent by an official of the Army Corps of Engineers whose name was redacted, stated, ?We anticipate no issue [with the Halliburton deal] since the action has been coordinated w VP?s office.?

?These new documents raise questions about the involvement of the Vice President?s office in the controversial KBR deal," Tom Fenton, Judicial Watch President, said. "One has to wonder whether the Army was being forthright about the issue.?

Judicial Watch was forced to obtain a court order to release the documents because USACE improperly claimed exemptions from the FOIA. One document USACE attempted to exempt from release includes a frank admission by an official who said, ?I am copying you on this crap since I honestly believe the competitive procurement will never happen.?

"It took the intervention of a federal district judge to force the Army to release the document," a Judicial Watch press release states.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is currently investigating possible criminal behavior in the way the Pentagon has awarded contracts to Halliburton. USACE demoted its highest-ranking civilian employee for blowing the whistle on improper and potentially illegal contracting practices committed by Halliburton and the Pentagon.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
DOGS THAT BARK said:
A--Cheney has not profited from war via Halibuton and really doesn't need the money.
B: regardless of who was in office Haliburton would have been rceived same contracts (no bid) as they did in prior adminisrtation.

If your going to put confidence in blog sites with opinion over several articles here stating references and sources --theres not much anyone can do about it.

Actually, I can take issue with both of these points. Cheney still has the stock options which he can only benefit from and exercise if the stock is showing a profit. There is a direct correlation between how much Cheney can give to charity in the coming years (which are deductions and obviously help his bottom line and visual standing as a charitable guy) and the price of Halliburton stock. If he makes sure the price of stock goes up with decisions that benefit Halliburton - like going to war with Iraq - then he benefits directly. Halliburton would also then benefit if Cheney exercises those millions in options with a tax benefit from paying out on those options. So, Halliburton wins from a rapidly escalating stock price due to Cheney's connection and decisions at face stock value, and in tax benefits taken from the option exercising.

And your second point...how many times have I heard about how weak the Dems are on the "war on terra" and how they would not have gone into Iraq because of that weakness. There are republicans who could have been president or vice president that did not have the direct ties that Cheney had with Halliburton that did not agree that going to war was a good idea. If anyone not so Hell-bent on hitting Iraq was running the show, and we didn't go in there, then how would Halliburton have benefitted like they have over the past few years? They wouldn't have. Period.
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
Cheney earned forty-four million dollars during his tenure at Halliburton. Although he has said that he ?severed all my ties with the company,? he continues to collect deferred compensation worth approximately a hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year, and he retains stock options worth more than eighteen million dollars.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,421
128
63
Bowling Green Ky
Out of curiousity do you just skip over pertinant facts that don't fit what your trying to project??

Which part of this in Mansons factcheck post above did you fail to read----- or you just want other lemmings to climb on and think Cheney will be pocketing profits from stock options in the future?


"That still would leave the possibility that Cheney could profit from his Halliburton stock options if the company's stock rises in value. However, Cheney and his wife Lynne have assigned any future profits from their stock options in Halliburton and several other companies to charity. And we're not just taking the Cheney's word for this -- we asked for a copy of the legal agreement they signed, which we post here publicly for the first time.

The "Gift Trust Agreement" the Cheney's signed two days before he took office turns over power of attorney to a trust administrator to sell the options at some future time and to give the after-tax profits to three charities. The agreement specifies that 40% will go to the University of Wyoming (Cheney's home state), 40% will go to George Washington University's medical faculty to be used for tax-exempt charitable purposes, and 20% will go to Capital Partners for Education , a charity that provides financial aid for low-income students in Washington, DC to attend private and religious schools.

The agreement states that it is "irrevocable and may not be terminated, waived or amended," so the Cheney's can't take back their options later.

The options owned by the Cheney's have been valued at nearly $8 million, his attorney says. Such valuations are rough estimates only -- the actual value will depend on what happens to stock prices in the future, which of course can't be known beforehand. But it is clear that giving up rights to the future profits constitutes a significant financial sacrifice, and a sizeable donation to the chosen charities."
__________________
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,421
128
63
Bowling Green Ky
Not you Chad --In was in reply to following--maybe if I put them side by side Judge can understand.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"and he retains stock options worth more than eighteen million dollars."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
That still would leave the possibility that Cheney could profit from his Halliburton stock options if the company's stock rises in value. However, Cheney and his wife Lynne have assigned any future profits from their stock options in Halliburton and several other companies to charity. And we're not just taking the Cheney's word for this -- we asked for a copy of the legal agreement they signed, which we post here publicly for the first time.

The "Gift Trust Agreement" the Cheney's signed two days before he took office turns over power of attorney to a trust administrator to sell the options at some future time and to give the after-tax profits to three charities. The agreement specifies that 40% will go to the University of Wyoming (Cheney's home state), 40% will go to George Washington University's medical faculty to be used for tax-exempt charitable purposes, and 20% will go to Capital Partners for Education , a charity that provides financial aid for low-income students in Washington, DC to attend private and religious schools.

The agreement states that it is "irrevocable and may not be terminated, waived or amended," so the Cheney's can't take back their options later.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

if he still can't comprehend I'd advise him to ask someone what
"irrevocable and may not be terminated, waived or amended," --means as if it's not self explainitory.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Gotcha, Dogs. I didn't think so...not saying you ain't gotta right to challenge what I'm trying to project...lol.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top