LOW TOTAL ON THE BOARD SYSTEM

REDSKIN

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2008
492
6
18

I went back today to the start of the NBA season to track an old system. It plays on the under of the lowest posted total on the board. This is what I found.


Date Lowest Total Final Result

Oct 28th 183 Boston 151 Won by 32
Oct 29th 193 San Ant 177 Won by 16
Oct 30th 187 Boston 208 Lost by 21
Oct 31st 181.5 Cleve 169 Won by 12.5
Nov 1st 185.5 Boston 184 Won by 1.5
Nov 2nd 175 Charlotte 147 Won by 28
Nov 3rd 191 Chicago 164 Won by 27


The system goes 6-1 after the first week with the average win coming in around 19.5 points. The system says to double up on a loser and triple up on a double loser. I can't remember how it did last year but it's off to a decent start so far this season. Just a little FYI for those who are into the system plays. BOL.
 

REDSKIN

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2008
492
6
18

I went back today to the start of the NBA season to track an old system. It plays on the under of the lowest posted total on the board. This is what I found.


Date Lowest Total Final Result

Oct 28th 183 Boston 151 Won by 32
Oct 29th 193 San Ant 177 Won by 16
Oct 30th 187 Boston 208 Lost by 21
Oct 31st 181.5 Cleve 169 Won by 12.5
Nov 1st 185.5 Boston 184 Won by 1.5
Nov 2nd 175 Charlotte 147 Won by 28
Nov 3rd 191 Chicago 164 Won by 27


The system goes 6-1 after the first week with the average win coming in around 19.5 points. The system says to double up on a loser and triple up on a double loser. I can't remember how it did last year but it's off to a decent start so far this season. Just a little FYI for those who are into the system plays. BOL.
Looks like the play for tonight would be under 187 Boston. Going to keep tracking this for at least another week just to see how it goes. If any1 has any comments or has used it before, I'm sure all the info would be useful. Thanks and good luck!
 

owtkast3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2004
1,050
4
0
Im pretty sure there had to be a set amount of games being played on that night. I think it was 4 or 5 im sure someone knows.
 

77sticks

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 8, 2005
2,963
0
0
It has to be 4 minimum I believe. Here are the last stats that Cisco posted last year...

Update

year to date:
Lowest total to under 27-23 -2.38
Highest total to go over 26-25 -3.38

1st Quarter
Lowest 29-17 +8.95
Highest 30-17 +16.36

****************************************

For the month of December:

Lowest total to under 14-12 -0.74
Highest total to go over 10-16 -11.56

1st Quarter
Lowest 15-9 +5.98
Highest 10-14 -4.74
 

REDSKIN

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2008
492
6
18
Im pretty sure there had to be a set amount of games being played on that night. I think it was 4 or 5 im sure someone knows.
Yeah, I remember that there had to be a certain amount of games but I can't remember if it was 3 or 4. This first week that I looked at had at least 1 night where there was less than that but I believe it won big. It also looks like the stuff that sticks posted shows it to be more profitable when bet in the 1st quarter. We'll have to keep an eye on it. Thanks for the input. BOL.
 

REDSKIN

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2008
492
6
18
Under 187 Boston WINNER!

System goes to 7-1 on the young season.
 

REDSKIN

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2008
492
6
18
Yeah Bender I know how this story goes, the second I jump on board the system will shit the bed. I'll let you know when I pull the trigger so you can start playing the over. LOL.
 

pfj

Registered User
Forum Member
May 9, 2009
5,611
7
0
this system works with both 3 and 4....someone across the street has it posted and how its doing. looks good so far tho
 

REDSKIN

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2008
492
6
18
Even though there were only 2 games last nte, I'll track the result anyway just to have a little more information when breaking this down.

Under 191 Clev 171pts Won by 20

System goes to 8-1 on the season.
 

thadchr

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2006
2,004
9
0
Wisconsin
Nice! Let's keep this thing alive.

The first quarter thing scares me a bit, simply in that I'd be a little afraid to double or triple up on a quarter play. I trust a system to hit 1-in-3 total games, but quarter lines can be so dynamic. That said, it shows the better record.

...So, is the consensus a day with 3 games minimum for the system to count?
 

REDSKIN

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2008
492
6
18
I'm in Bender, they'll probably score 230 pts 2nte. LOL.
 

Keyser Soze

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2000
2,264
43
48
Orlando
Yeah........I was the one that originated the system about 5 years back. I always used a 4 game minimum. Last year started out relatively well, but took a dive and then a lot of folks jumped all over me, even though I posted in the very first post that it is purely a "system" and I am only "sharing" it.........I sure haven't been the only one around here to be bashed for trying to share information, but I didn't feel the need to go through it again this year and did not bother posting it at the beginning.

Glad to see that others here are doing well with it to this point.
 

Jord20

Sharp
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Jun 27, 2002
40,226
3,871
113
Chicago, IL
I hopped on the Boston/Minny under Wednesday night... I'll give it another shot :0corn

GOod luck to us!
 

BasketballNut

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 21, 2008
1,000
2
0
system is nonsense. what if the bobcats game gets cancelled? the odds of the spurs game going under suddenly go up?
 

Keyser Soze

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2000
2,264
43
48
Orlando
Knew it wouldn't take long.

It's only a system. Please.........If you don't want to use it; don't.

But then again, it's always nice to have somebody prove my point.
 

BasketballNut

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 21, 2008
1,000
2
0
dont worry i wont bet it. still fail to see how a play is +EV just because other games that have no correlation with each other have a higher total.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top