Lunch Atop A Skyscraper: The Story Behind The 1932 Photo

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
May 26, 2002
90,502
1,542
113
50
Canada
Safety standards were a bit lacking in 1932........

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7QCYDzsQ_yM" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,210
374
83
74
have these 2 in my office for years...

tuff guys .......

sad part of the story is many died falling while working on these skyscrapers.

reports are that despite the frantic pace to finish the Chrysler Building before the Empire State Building noone was killed during the Chrysler Building job.

www.allpar.com/history/chrysler-building.html


lunch-atop-a-skyscraper,2311904.jpg



construction-workers-resting-on-steel-beam-above-manhattan,2311899.jpg


note.....I reference Chrysler Building when in fact the pics are from the construction of the RCA Building in New York City.
 
Last edited:

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,210
374
83
74
I confused:facepalm: them with the Chrysler Building earlier..don't why as I have read about these pics before because I have to reprints in my office..

my understanding from research Ebbets staged the workers that day but all were true workers on the job. links below


pics are from 69th floor of the construction of RCA Building

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Clyde_Ebbets

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunch_atop_a_Skyscraper

Lunch atop a Skyscraper[edit]

Main article: Lunch atop a Skyscraper

By the 1930s Ebbets was a well-known photographer and had work published in major newspapers across the nation, including The New York Times. In 1932, Ebbets was appointed the Photographic Director for the Rockefeller Center's development. On September 29, 1932, he took the photo Lunch atop a Skyscraper, which depicts eleven men sitting on a girder eating lunch, their feet dangling from the beams hundreds of feet above the New York streets. The photo was taken on the 69th floor of the RCA Building in the last several months of construction. It has been postulated that multiple photographers collaborated on the shoot, however, the Ebbets family has produced verified written records of Ebbets' authorship including original receipts on Ebbets' professional letterhead showing his billing for the work done on the shoot, an original glass negative of Ebbets at work that day on the beam adjacent to the workmen, other original images taken by Ebbets during his work at Rockefeller Center, photos of the image displayed in Ebbets' office at Rockefeller Center, as well as copies of the original article from 1932 showing the famous photo which were found in his personal scrapbook. All of these documents supporting Ebbets' authorship have been independently verified by professional researchers, intellectual property attorneys and private investigators. During the photo's worldwide circulation over the past 20 years, no other photographer nor any photographer's estate has ever claimed authorship of the famous image.[SUP][12]


[/SUP]
Overview
The photograph depicts eleven men eating lunch, seated on a girder with their feet dangling 840 feet (260 meters)[1] above the New York City streets. The photograph was taken on September 20, 1932, on the 69th floor of the RCA Building during the last months of construction. According to archivists, the photograph was in fact prearranged.[1] Although the photograph shows real ironworkers, it is believed that the moment was staged by Rockefeller Center to promote its new skyscraper.[1] Other photographs taken on the same day show some of the workers throwing a football and pretending to sleep on the girder.[2] The photo appeared in the Sunday photo supplement of the New York Herald Tribune on October 2.
 

Penguinfan

Thread banned
Forum Member
Dec 5, 2001
10,393
190
0
Vanished into vortex
I guess I meant that those photos are a matter of camera perspective and they are not really dangling 800+ feet in the air. None of them were in danger of falling more than 10 feet when these photos were taken.
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
May 26, 2002
90,502
1,542
113
50
Canada
None of them were in danger of falling more than 10 feet when these photos were taken.


The above statement is incorrect, and if you saw the video that was posted you saw the risk the 3 photographers took (see them dangling way up there) to get all those photos. The three photographers and the construction workers were so high if they fell it was instant death. There were roughly 150 different photos taken over a period of 2 weeks, none of them were taken 10 feet above the ground:facepalm:

That famous photo was taken roughly 850 feet in the air, at roughly 69 stories up. Almost all the photos were staged for publicity but staged or not the height the photos were taken were at death defying heights.
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
May 26, 2002
90,502
1,542
113
50
Canada
There was a completed floor 10 feet below them that you can't see in the picture.

If you can't see what is below them, how do you know there is a floor 10 feet below them? And there are tons of pictures from that photo shoot (some with same guys) where there is nothing but death below them. So if the whole point of the shots was for publicity (most were staged) why would you take a bunch of photos with death below them but then all of a sudden take a picture where the guys would only fall 10 feet?

So again, how do you know those guys are only 10 feet above a cement floor?
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
May 26, 2002
90,502
1,542
113
50
Canada

I was unaware Penguin was there, well that explains it then. Since he had provided zero proof of his claim I was going to call him out for bullshit, but since he was there, I guess his crazy claim has merit. I mean you can't argue with somebody that was there.
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
May 26, 2002
90,502
1,542
113
50
Canada
Or, I've actually read a good bit about this and believe the (unproven) theory that there was a completed floor beneath them that isn't shown in the photo.


I'll go with the thought process that if there are a bunch of other photos (some with the same people that were in that famous photo) where you can clearly see they are "dangling in the air" then no reason to think just that one photo is any different. I mean yes there could be a net 10 feet below them, hell there could be a giant ball pit with a bunch of stuffed animals 10 feet below them. But when a bunch of other pictures with those workers "cheating death" not sure why anybody would think the famous picture was any different.

You made it sound like you had proof when you said......

I'm assuming you guys all know those photos aren't what they appear to be, right?


I meant that those photos are a matter of camera perspective and they are not really dangling 800+ feet in the air. None of them were in danger of falling more than 10 feet when these photos were taken.

Don't tell me I'm wrong when I'm not.


you didn't.


Signed:
Jackass
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top