May 11

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,649
25
48
Toronto
Not 'capping these.
Board looks ugly and I've been out to naked lunch regardless.
Just some mildly irrelevant words, from what I've seen.

Stauffer's been great while Wolf's been hit or miss. O is all Mil and could very well continue from apparent crushing Tuesday. Line (Mil-130) looks right on Wolf inconsistency and Mil recent O slumpage.

Volquez not trustable and Wandy majorly inconsistent--can throw gold and then shit from game to game. Reds feating on L this season. Can't touch these Astros and V line mildly tempting.

Niese not a turn-on and Ubaldo certainly not in form. Price looks insane based on recent Rox (lack of) production while mets pretending like they might be a factor. Ugly. Over 8, maybe, save for Rox lack of anything.

Kuroda-Maholm? barf. Kuroda another who is hit or miss. Maholm with the rare solid game, and could have same vs majorly unproductive dodgers (can hit, just not score). Coin-toss line reflects my opinion. lad if I had no choice.

Prefer Lee to Nolasco, but who doesn't? Price actually ain't too bad, either.

Hanson over looks like a no-brainer but so did Hudson over Marquis. Hanson with maybe more upside than Hudson, at this stage, but price is one that my mother told me to lay off of. Under 13, for sure.

Westbrook-Garza. hmmm. Westbrook has always been inconsistent and pretending to be perfect in last was weird. Garza's got game but prefer Vsticks while Garza has not been a "winner," this year, despite striking out whoever he may. Impossible call, as is and was Tuesday's.

Totally prefer Sanchez over Galarraga but totally prefer d'sticks over Champsticks. Not a coin-toss as home pen clearly better while backing Galarraga (and inconsistent d'backsticks) sounds only mildly better than a date with Rosanne Barr.


Gonna watch period 2, before threatening to waste some more of your time.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,649
25
48
Toronto
Mildly prefer Baker to Coke but nothing else about the homers. det +101 or (likely) pass.

Same mild shiite with Gonzalez>Harrison, again everything else (save maybe BP) favouring homers, incl. possible wake-up-and-smell-the-coffeeage shown Tuesday. Tex -108 or pass. Totals under 9 at this ballpark are asking for trouble, even without checking windage.

I don't like Litsch and who can like Lackey this year? I'd like to see the line-ups, ump and weather, first, but over 9 or pass the dutchie.

Price over Carrasco, no question, even at -120.
Under, maybe, but not an 8 at -123.
Former Devils should totally be.

Tillman may have game, someday, but Felix has often. Price a little annoying, at -130, but any signs of life from m's and this would be higher. Little sign of life from O's, lately, so m's or nothing, here.

Peavy's 1st vs still-undetermined Chatwood? And an overachieving O vs a majorly see-ya O? Jeez...I love Peavy from some way-back years past but backing the pale hosers, presently, is not appealing. Under the 8 if 'sox had any kind of pen--which they'll need--and which they don't have.


As mentioned, sketchy board, IMO.
Might drop whatevas opinions but my picks have been funnier than Mike Birbiglia so I think I'll hold off on picks until at least a personal 3-day winning streak appears.
#1 looks good for Tuesday but no chickens hatched yet.

GL anywho



<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/L3LUMgU2Mlk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

It's a cool Hip song. Title is goofier than Leafs recent playoff record.
(cough) at least there "is" a title.

whatevas enjoy freedom
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top