http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/cda08-05.cfm
Here's a nice legitimate report on who really enlists in the Army and where they come from. I know it has been discussed many times here before how only poor and disenfranchised are forced to enlist. This may shed some light on things.
Based on an understanding of the limitations of any objective definition of quality, this report com*pares military volunteers to the civilian population on four demographic characteristics: household income, education level, racial and ethnic back*ground, and regional origin. This report finds that:
U.S. military service disproportionately attracts enlisted personnel and officerswho do not come from disadvantaged backgrounds. Previous Her*itage Foundation research demonstrated that the quality of enlisted troops has increased since the start of the Iraq war. This report demon*strates that the same is true of the officer corps.
Members of the all-volunteer military are sig*nificantly more likely to come from high-income neighborhoods than from low-income neighborhoods. Only 11 percent of enlisted recruits in 2007 came from the poorest one-fifth (quintile) of neighborhoods, while 25 per*cent came from the wealthiest quintile. These trends are even more pronounced in the Army Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) pro*gram, in which 40 percent of enrollees come from the wealthiest neighborhoods?a number that has increased substantially over the past four years.
American soldiers are more educated than their peers. A little more than 1 percent of enlisted per*sonnel lack a high school degree, compared to 21 percent of men 18?24 years old, and 95 percent of officer accessions have at least a bachelor?s degree.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, minorities are not overrepresented in military service. Enlisted troops are somewhat more likely to be white or black than their non-military peers. Whites are proportionately represented in the officer corps, and blacks are overrepresented, but their rate of overrepresentation has declined each year from 2004 to 2007. New recruits are also disproportionately likely to come from the South, which is in line with the history of South*ern military tradition.
The facts do not support the belief that many American soldiers volunteer because society offers them few other opportunities. The average enlisted person or officer could have had lucrative career opportunities in the private sector. Those who argue that American soldiers risk their lives because they have no other opportunities belittle the personal sacrifices of those who serve out of love for their country.
Here's a nice legitimate report on who really enlists in the Army and where they come from. I know it has been discussed many times here before how only poor and disenfranchised are forced to enlist. This may shed some light on things.
Based on an understanding of the limitations of any objective definition of quality, this report com*pares military volunteers to the civilian population on four demographic characteristics: household income, education level, racial and ethnic back*ground, and regional origin. This report finds that:
U.S. military service disproportionately attracts enlisted personnel and officerswho do not come from disadvantaged backgrounds. Previous Her*itage Foundation research demonstrated that the quality of enlisted troops has increased since the start of the Iraq war. This report demon*strates that the same is true of the officer corps.
Members of the all-volunteer military are sig*nificantly more likely to come from high-income neighborhoods than from low-income neighborhoods. Only 11 percent of enlisted recruits in 2007 came from the poorest one-fifth (quintile) of neighborhoods, while 25 per*cent came from the wealthiest quintile. These trends are even more pronounced in the Army Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) pro*gram, in which 40 percent of enrollees come from the wealthiest neighborhoods?a number that has increased substantially over the past four years.
American soldiers are more educated than their peers. A little more than 1 percent of enlisted per*sonnel lack a high school degree, compared to 21 percent of men 18?24 years old, and 95 percent of officer accessions have at least a bachelor?s degree.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, minorities are not overrepresented in military service. Enlisted troops are somewhat more likely to be white or black than their non-military peers. Whites are proportionately represented in the officer corps, and blacks are overrepresented, but their rate of overrepresentation has declined each year from 2004 to 2007. New recruits are also disproportionately likely to come from the South, which is in line with the history of South*ern military tradition.
The facts do not support the belief that many American soldiers volunteer because society offers them few other opportunities. The average enlisted person or officer could have had lucrative career opportunities in the private sector. Those who argue that American soldiers risk their lives because they have no other opportunities belittle the personal sacrifices of those who serve out of love for their country.
