Well when I first thought about this game i figured that mizzou would be a 10+ point favorite. However, after a little bit of introductory research i see that the #4 team in the country has struggled mightily against some mediocre opponents. Coppin St. has been a decent team in years past, but i question whether or not mizzou should have to come from behind against a team of that caliber. Addtionally mizzou only beat a weak oakland team by 5 points.. Also, Quinn Snyder has been very disappointed with his teams lack of hustle and overall performance so far this season.
All that being said, Indiana is still very weak.. The question is how good is Mizzou? Can they live up to their #4 billing. The line i just saw had Mizzou -5 and at first look was fishy. Now i think it is set about right considering the weakness that Mizzou has shown against weak opponents. However, if mizzou comes to play i think they cover the #.
Here is some info that I found on cbssportsline that gives a little insight on MIzzou so far this year.
Tigers report: Getting inside Dec. 5, 2003
Notes, quotes | Strategy and personnel
Management of the basketball was an issue for Missouri in its first two games. Despite being ranked among the nation's top five, the Tigers committed 39 turnovers in their first two games and each time had 14 in the first half.
This would be a difficult total to accept against a Big 12 foe, let alone Oakland and Coppin State, which each used a variety of zones to fluster the Tigers on their home floor.
"Teams that probably people ain't never heard about are giving us great runs," guard Jimmy McKinney said.
"I'm a little disappointed because I thought we could play better. But we played two good teams. I don't care if they're not known, if they're not ranked, whatever."
Those type of ranked opponents will soon creep on to the Missouri schedule. The Tigers must get into a better flow offensively by then, though coach Quin Snyder is rightfully concerned about his team's defensive lapses.
Many of the problems the Tigers have come off lack of hustle. They're not getting through screens and are also getting beat off the dribble.
In time, they should work out these problems. They're too good not to.
Anyway right now lean: mizzou -5 2 units
All comments welcome.
All that being said, Indiana is still very weak.. The question is how good is Mizzou? Can they live up to their #4 billing. The line i just saw had Mizzou -5 and at first look was fishy. Now i think it is set about right considering the weakness that Mizzou has shown against weak opponents. However, if mizzou comes to play i think they cover the #.
Here is some info that I found on cbssportsline that gives a little insight on MIzzou so far this year.
Tigers report: Getting inside Dec. 5, 2003
Notes, quotes | Strategy and personnel
Management of the basketball was an issue for Missouri in its first two games. Despite being ranked among the nation's top five, the Tigers committed 39 turnovers in their first two games and each time had 14 in the first half.
This would be a difficult total to accept against a Big 12 foe, let alone Oakland and Coppin State, which each used a variety of zones to fluster the Tigers on their home floor.
"Teams that probably people ain't never heard about are giving us great runs," guard Jimmy McKinney said.
"I'm a little disappointed because I thought we could play better. But we played two good teams. I don't care if they're not known, if they're not ranked, whatever."
Those type of ranked opponents will soon creep on to the Missouri schedule. The Tigers must get into a better flow offensively by then, though coach Quin Snyder is rightfully concerned about his team's defensive lapses.
Many of the problems the Tigers have come off lack of hustle. They're not getting through screens and are also getting beat off the dribble.
In time, they should work out these problems. They're too good not to.
Anyway right now lean: mizzou -5 2 units
All comments welcome.