More misinformation.
- Thread starter Cricket
- Start date
Still posting from BS sources. You're so gullible. See below for their "Low Credibility Rating", "Far Right Bias", and general listing as "Questionable".
Now, let's take a look at Kevin McCarthy's claim. "When it comes to the border crisis, the Democrats are spreading misinformation." Then he posts a video and just says what they are saying is "misinformation". That's not how it works!!!! You don't just say it's misinformation, you come back with ACTUAL INFORMATION! Does your fucking brain even work? Just labeling something "misinformation" doesn't make it so! Good grief, you're such a dope.
<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=1]Western Journal[/h]</header><ins class="adsbygoogle" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-ad-format="auto" data-adsbygoogle-status="done" data-ad-status="filled" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; height: 280px;"><ins id="aswift_0_expand" tabindex="0" title="Advertisement" aria-label="Advertisement" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; display: inline-table; height: 280px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 777px; background-color: transparent;"><ins id="aswift_0_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; height: 280px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 777px; background-color: transparent; overflow: visible;">
</ins></ins></ins><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]
[/h]
[h=2]QUESTIONABLE SOURCE[/h]A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>
</header>
[h=3]Detailed Report[/h]Questionable Reasoning: Far Right, Failed Fact Checks, Propaganda, Conspiracy
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
</center>
Now, let's take a look at Kevin McCarthy's claim. "When it comes to the border crisis, the Democrats are spreading misinformation." Then he posts a video and just says what they are saying is "misinformation". That's not how it works!!!! You don't just say it's misinformation, you come back with ACTUAL INFORMATION! Does your fucking brain even work? Just labeling something "misinformation" doesn't make it so! Good grief, you're such a dope.
<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=1]Western Journal[/h]</header><ins class="adsbygoogle" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-ad-format="auto" data-adsbygoogle-status="done" data-ad-status="filled" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; height: 280px;"><ins id="aswift_0_expand" tabindex="0" title="Advertisement" aria-label="Advertisement" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; display: inline-table; height: 280px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 777px; background-color: transparent;"><ins id="aswift_0_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; height: 280px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 777px; background-color: transparent; overflow: visible;">
[h=2]QUESTIONABLE SOURCE[/h]A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>
</header>
- Overall, we rate Western Journal Right Biased and Questionable based on story selection and editorial opinions that strongly favor the right and numerous failed fact checks.
[h=3]Detailed Report[/h]Questionable Reasoning: Far Right, Failed Fact Checks, Propaganda, Conspiracy
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
</center>
LOL
These guys would never pass a media literacy course.
Peace!
I just don't get it. Blind faith in everyone on his team, zero critical thinking. I'd be so embarrassed.
Just what do news do you watch? You'll ignore video proof. If it doesn't agree with your spin on it,you dismiss it.Do you ever question what your being spoon fed,? Doesn't anything in politics smell fishy to you? anything? Everything is above board,transparent and honest? WTF you guys are the perfect stooges. You sure like to lecture though. I'm thinking you'll never come around:sadwave:
Once and for all the source(no matter how you rate it) isn't always wrong. Your ministry of truth isn't always on the up and up.
Once and for all the source(no matter how you rate it) isn't always wrong. Your ministry of truth isn't always on the up and up.
YOU DON'T GET IT. It doesn't matter if I agree with it or not. I don't ignore video proof. Evidence is evidence. Showing a video and saying it's true or false isn't proof of anything other than what you watched.
I don't watch the news. I watch videos that come across my feed, but I get my news, mostly, from Reuters, Washington Post, and the AP. Credibility rating for all = HIGH CREDIBILITY. Compare that to your conspiracy theory pushers feeding you your "news". If you choose to get your news from sources listed as "Low Credibility" or "Questionable", you're not looking for information, you're looking for confirmation.
YOU DON'T GET IT. The Main stream news tailors it's news. Ignores stories that don't fit the agenda. Overblows those that do. Yet you hook, line and sinker it as if it's the gospel truth. When the media is called out on something and proven wrong you rationalize it by ignoring that. We've been misinformed(right and left) by a lot of politicians just admit it. Then you would be credible to me.
You're 68 years old! When I present you with a HIGH CREDIBILITY source and a LOW CREDIBILITY source, you choose the low one. WTF is wrong with you? Of course there is bias out there, I've never not acknowledged that. Being aware of that fact and reading with a filter is the answer. Your approach of seeking out the MOST BIASED sites is asinine.
Since you need to point out my age,here's an old saying...Don't forget to read the fine print kid!
You've been brainwashed, Boomer. I keep pointing out that you are choosing LOW CREDIBILITY news outlets over HIGH CREDIBILITY and you won't address it. Why is that?
I've made my point. You're hopeless.
See post #5,#7. You lose whenever something is exposed after being denied and suppressed by the MSM.
