Heres another example of liberal media false reporting--this was interview of Clinton by lemming Stephanopoulos on monday and reported by lemming NYT below--and taken at face value by lemmings that don't view fair and balanced media and somehow believe Clinton could actually tell the truth.
"PRESIDENT CLINTON: Well, that's what I think. I think this idea--I think it's very important that Americans understand, you know, tax cuts are always popular, but about half of these tax cuts since 2001 have gone to people in my income group, the top 1 percent. I've gotten four tax cuts"
---Really hate to inform you Bill but only people that didn't get tax break is those that paid no taxes--and ( pardon me) but maybe you would like to inform the public how you got to top 1% when never paying taxes on more than $35,000 income in privite sector????
Slick--"They're responsible for this big structural deficit, and they're not going away, the deficits aren't."
Really he doesn't think 911--2 wars and natural disaters played any part. Right Slick we could have continued to look other way as you did and let them try a 3rd time on our soil--and maybe you could elaborate on how "they" were responsible for 911 when it was you that failed to take UBL when offered??
"PRESIDENT CLINTON: Well, I think we did a good job of that. For example, we had the lowest African-American unemployment, the lowest African-American poverty rate ever recorded. We had the highest homeownership, highest business ownership, and we moved 100 times as many people out of poverty in eight years as had been moved out in the previous 12 years"
oh really slick--I thought "the facts proved that this admin has "ALL THE ABOVE" --maybe you missed the poverty reports-home ownership reports or any factual reports what so ever.--in addition are you unaware are just simply can't tell the truth that this admin has spent FAR MORE on entitlement programs for the poor (unfotunatly) then you ever did.
"This is a matter of public policy, and whether it's race-based or not, if you give your tax cuts to the rich and hope everything works out all right, and poverty goes up, and it disproportionately affects black and brown people, that's a consequence of the action made. That's what they did in the eighties; that's what they've done in this decade."
Let me give you some more facts to chew on Billy Bob--despite your admin not having any 911--or war defense budgets and while you benefited from dot.com boom and left office with economy in state of recession at its bust--do you know despite all this that our country will have MORE TAX REVENUE this year than ANY year in your administration WITH theTAX CUTS--how do explain this.--and once again poverty has went down NOT up in this adin--don't think you can spin the definition thing again--up is up and down is down.
fingers are getting tired--here is entire script of "canned"interview--you be the judge-and remember there are those who view these outlets as gospel without ever considering fact finding on their own--Right Stevie
no question why Slick and Mrs Slick refused to be interview by Oreilly--they like these liberal outlets that take his word as gospel--with no questions or facts involved.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/18/politics/18clinton-text.html?pagewanted=1
"PRESIDENT CLINTON: Well, that's what I think. I think this idea--I think it's very important that Americans understand, you know, tax cuts are always popular, but about half of these tax cuts since 2001 have gone to people in my income group, the top 1 percent. I've gotten four tax cuts"
---Really hate to inform you Bill but only people that didn't get tax break is those that paid no taxes--and ( pardon me) but maybe you would like to inform the public how you got to top 1% when never paying taxes on more than $35,000 income in privite sector????
Slick--"They're responsible for this big structural deficit, and they're not going away, the deficits aren't."
Really he doesn't think 911--2 wars and natural disaters played any part. Right Slick we could have continued to look other way as you did and let them try a 3rd time on our soil--and maybe you could elaborate on how "they" were responsible for 911 when it was you that failed to take UBL when offered??
"PRESIDENT CLINTON: Well, I think we did a good job of that. For example, we had the lowest African-American unemployment, the lowest African-American poverty rate ever recorded. We had the highest homeownership, highest business ownership, and we moved 100 times as many people out of poverty in eight years as had been moved out in the previous 12 years"
oh really slick--I thought "the facts proved that this admin has "ALL THE ABOVE" --maybe you missed the poverty reports-home ownership reports or any factual reports what so ever.--in addition are you unaware are just simply can't tell the truth that this admin has spent FAR MORE on entitlement programs for the poor (unfotunatly) then you ever did.
"This is a matter of public policy, and whether it's race-based or not, if you give your tax cuts to the rich and hope everything works out all right, and poverty goes up, and it disproportionately affects black and brown people, that's a consequence of the action made. That's what they did in the eighties; that's what they've done in this decade."
Let me give you some more facts to chew on Billy Bob--despite your admin not having any 911--or war defense budgets and while you benefited from dot.com boom and left office with economy in state of recession at its bust--do you know despite all this that our country will have MORE TAX REVENUE this year than ANY year in your administration WITH theTAX CUTS--how do explain this.--and once again poverty has went down NOT up in this adin--don't think you can spin the definition thing again--up is up and down is down.
fingers are getting tired--here is entire script of "canned"interview--you be the judge-and remember there are those who view these outlets as gospel without ever considering fact finding on their own--Right Stevie
no question why Slick and Mrs Slick refused to be interview by Oreilly--they like these liberal outlets that take his word as gospel--with no questions or facts involved.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/18/politics/18clinton-text.html?pagewanted=1
Last edited:
