NBA UNDER LOWEST TOTAL ON THE BOARD
- Thread starter REDSKIN
- Start date
I wouldn't double up your bet the next day...
Its almost like the double up bet on blackjack... it doesn't work. You might do well for a little bit... but after a while, you will be risking 1k to profit $50. It doesn't make much sense $ wise.
actually it went well last year, i followed a capper that did it and he did well.. hope this helped a little
According to my numbers:
96-70 If you took UNDER for the lowest listed Total on the board each night. This includes taking the under on more than 1 game if the lowest total is the same (which only occurred 3 days in my data).
Not bad, 57%, +19 units.
96-70 If you took UNDER for the lowest listed Total on the board each night. This includes taking the under on more than 1 game if the lowest total is the same (which only occurred 3 days in my data).
Not bad, 57%, +19 units.
Some interesting data in addition:
Had you played this straight for 1 unit the entire year, and doubled down if you lost (and only picked one game if there was multiple games):
+79.5 units on the season
*This is assuming you happened to take the losing pick on 2 of the multiple game days (the 3rd occurrence was all winners so you would have won had you picked any of the games).
Would have faced (2) 4-game losing streaks which would require 17.6 units at risk the 5th day.
Had you played this straight for 1 unit the entire year, and doubled down if you lost (and only picked one game if there was multiple games):
+79.5 units on the season
*This is assuming you happened to take the losing pick on 2 of the multiple game days (the 3rd occurrence was all winners so you would have won had you picked any of the games).
Would have faced (2) 4-game losing streaks which would require 17.6 units at risk the 5th day.
I did when I could, but I didn't get many chances to bet the under EVERY night because sometimes not getting in on time to put my wagers in. Typically when I did, and followed, there was reasonable success.
I was just thinking about this today at work too. Interesting!
There were a few stipulations to the lowest total on the board too. I think there had to be atleast 5 games or something of that extent.
I was just thinking about this today at work too. Interesting!
There were a few stipulations to the lowest total on the board too. I think there had to be atleast 5 games or something of that extent.
It was actually a system that I brought to the board a few years back. I used a minimum of 4 games on the board.........
Started out hot last year and then hit a bad stretch.
I started a business and didn't have time to eat, let alone put time in to the system........
Things are still a bit hectic, but will try and get back on the horse this year.
Good luck guys.
Started out hot last year and then hit a bad stretch.
I started a business and didn't have time to eat, let alone put time in to the system........
Things are still a bit hectic, but will try and get back on the horse this year.
Good luck guys.
I was waiting for you! Looking forward to your plays Keyser. There was another guy along with THEBOUNDBOOK that I liked to follow last year. I think his name was NBAJAMMER?
If remember correctly I think to start the season it was like 12-0 or something close to that and then started to even out as the season went on.
- Nov 28, 2007
- 8,587
- 18
- 0
Yep right here:
Milw +6
Clev/Bos ov 180
Port +7.5
If I don't go 3-0 you will get tomorrow night's picks free.
