NFL FORMULA 3 UPDATE

[WARRIOR]

NFL FORMULA 3 UPDATE

Prior to the beginning of the picks, I projected that I expected F3 to do better as dogs, better in non-division, and better when all 3 agree. And especially to keep an eye on games where a LEVEL 3 rating or higher was involved. After 2 weeks of plays, non-division underdogs are a perfect 3-0 when all three formulas agree.

In addition, there has been only 1 play where all three formulas agree and atleast 1 of them was a level 3 rating or higher. It came home strong yesterday as the ATLANTA FALCONS +7 upset the Denver Broncos 41-28 for the easy win and cover. It was the PERFECT setting as the Birds were dogs, playing non-division, with all three formulas agreeing on the Falcons.

To make it better, one formula had a Level 3 rating and another a Level 4 rating--two formulas @ Level 3 or greater. The third was a level one. Keep an eye on these non-division dogs when all three formulas agree; and especially when atleast one of them is a level 3 or higher. We're just getting started...

gl,
dave

 

[taker02000]

It probably would help if you told what the formulas were maybe!!

 

[WARRIOR]

No.

 

[WARRIOR]

P.S.

I post the complete Formula Breakdown and all the picks at 4 other forums. I tried posting the info here but it rejected it because of too many characters...

dave

 

[BleedDodgerBlue]

I thought long and hard about how i would respond to your post. maybe all of 3 seconds warrior. and this is what i came up with.

YOU ARE AN IDIO......

now, so i don't get in trouble, let me explain myself. you might not be an idiot per se, but your post comes of idiotic. okay, so you are an idiot.

lets do a breakdown of what you have offered us the viewer so far at madjack sports. for one, you have 3 previous posts that are about 4 pages in lengths, ALL of which have quadratic equations and formulas and spreadsheets and a whole bunch of other stuff. All of course with the number ZERO in the paramaters. This makes sense because a good chemist when building a formula starts with a zero base as he fine tunes the formula. I forgot, no explanation to your madness.

Now you come back today and post that there has been one apocolyptic occurence where level 3 met level four and the stars aligned and it was the perfect situation. THE PROBLEM DAVE is that if you want us to be interested in your quantum physics it would help if you told us who you liked before the game. Coming into the forum and telling us after the game that you and your formula won really doesnt do much.

so whereas im as happy as can be that formula III is really turning out to be all that you dreamed and then some, it doesnt do this forum any good unless you post a pick BEFORE the game. And we don't really care about status updates to some mad formula unless you are going to explain it, which we really dont' want anyway

there, ive fully explained myself.

 

[WARRIOR]

I do post them before the game. Next weeks' games are already up at forums that don't reject it...

gl,
dave

 

[BleedDodgerBlue]

OK, thanks for the reply
and again not to stir the pot,
BUT what is the point of posting here then??

WHY tell us how good you are, and that although you cannot post us
1) WHO you are taking
2) WHY you are taking them

just doesnt make sense

 

[AKA 1ontop]

is it just me or is the guy NUTS?

 

[WARRIOR]

No I'm not nuts. Formula 3 takes Six Weeks of data. Prior to Week Seven, I posted a thread a MJ's entitled:

2004 NFL FORMULA III TRACKING

It was posted on Oct 21st.


Then, for Week 8, I posted a thread with the same title on October 28th.


This week I posted an UPDATE (this thread), but when I went to post my Full Blown Thread (again, entitled 2004 NFL FORMULA III TRACKING) for "this" week (week nine), the thread was rejected for having too many characters...

dave

 

[AKA 1ontop]

so y not just post your plays?

 

[WARRIOR]

Consensus Last Week: 8-6
Consensus YTD: 9-7

Consensus Week Nine: Jets, Oak, Dal, Was, Ari, Phi, Tam, Gia, Nor, Sea, Den, Nwe, Bal, Ind

gl,
davew

 

[AKA 1ontop]

WOW!
sorry but is anyone really reading this guys posts :scared
this guy (WARRIOR) is all over the place
If your 4 real
YOUR NUTS-or maybe f'ed up if ya know what I mean?

sh!t I want what this guy is smoking
the sh!t im smoking must not be working! if ya get what I'm saying? :weed:

:sadwave:

 

[nyraider]

SO WHICH PICKS ARE THE STRONGEST PICKS THIS WEEK??? THERE WAS NO WAY ANY OF US KNEW ABOUT YOUR 'ATL' PICK LAST WEEK! I'M A PRETTY SMART PERSON, BUT TO BE HONEST, I DONT HAVE A CLUE WHAT YOUR POST MEANS!!! CAN YOU TELL US WHICH OF YOUR PICKS ARE THE STONGEST IN YOUR SYSTEM??
THANKS AND GOOD LUCK DAN!

 

[WARRIOR]

AKA,

What part of this convesation do you not understand? Let me help you.

1.) I post an update to how my Formula III is doing.

I have posted the Games and the RESULTS page on Oct 21 and Oct 28. In the October 21 post, I then post a 'reply' to 'clarify' what I'm doing. In that 'reply', I CLEARLY state that the fancy looking page is nothing more than a RESULTS PAGE to 'track and breakdown' the results of the actual picks (which are posted mid week).

2.) Take2000 suggests I post the formulas.

3.) I say no, while a smile. I don't give out my formulas, just posting the picks and tracking their results.

4.) Blue Dodger goes on the offensive calling me an idio, presumably meaning idiot. Then goes on a slew of incorrect statements all of which could've been avoided had he/she done a simple search and read my stuff.

5.) Being limited in time, I dont' bother challenging all of Dodgers incorrect presumptions, but I merely post that I had indeed posted the picks before the games.

6.) Blue Dodger is seemingly apologetic to some extent, but is still suggesting that I'm trying to tell people how good I am, which I am not. It is clear in my post that I am tracking new formulas that have never been tested. Period. I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone, just sharing with the forum. The Update has nothing to do with how good I am, but rather what the strengths--so far--are regarding the Formulas.

7.) You chirp in with something really constructive, claiming I'm nuts. What you apparently do not understand is just how much time, work, and effort I have put into developing the formulas; then, updating the numbers each week, posting the games at forums as a means of contributing, and tracking the results as well.

8.) I respond to your post by giving you information that will help you understand what I am doing.

9.) You ask me to post the plays.

10.) I post them as requested, but you will not get the most out of them because by ONLY posting the plays WITHOUT the results chart, you don't have insights as to strengths and weaknesses of the games and picks. Nevertheless I post them as you asked.

11.) You respond by saying I am all over the place and smoking something.

I feel sorry for you AKA. You have a hole in your soul sir. There are two kinds or people, really; only two. Those that build up and those that tear down. Every word you aimed at me is apparently a projection of what's going on with you. Either that or you just can't follow a conversation very good.

I've been in and out of Jack's place for a few years. All I can say is that you do not represent the calibre of clientle that I am used to reading here are MJs. Bashing and name-calling. I dont' remember it being that way.

If anyone wants to follow the Formula 3 results, they will be posted at 4 other forums where I have not received bashing but rather positive input...

gl,
dave

 

[WARRIOR]

NyRaider,

Please take the time to read my other posts and replys. Not being abrupt, but really, I don't have time to repeat the things that have already been posted.

The atlanta picks "was" the ONLY pick in which ALL 3 FORMULAS AGREED "and" atleast 1 of them was a LEVEL 3 ratings or higher.

The atlanta pick was listed all by itself under that "precise" category. Please, go read the stuff.

Since MJ's format rejected my Tracking post this week (too many characters), you have no way of knowing which games are stronger than others.

This week's best best is the Denver Broncos. It is the only game where all 3 formulas agree "and" atleast one of them is a level 3 rating or higher.

If you'll go back to my post on October 21, I have a reply in their somewhere that explains this stuff...

dave