robert
i normally don't pay attention to posts that don't have write-ups, and the only time i posted on your thread, those 4 words fueled an explosion. it got to the point i wanted to take it back, but it was too late.
if we can put that aside for the sake of a handicapping argument, i noticed you are coming up with an awful lot of plays, and i find it hard to believe that there is enough of a spread advantage to select all these, as many of these projections fall within a couple of points of the lines themselves.
you mentioned earlier that the computer does not take into account injuries, and i am sure some other factors and intangibles as well.
when you take these almost-impossible-to -keep-up-with "flaws" into account, shouldn't that kind of force you to be more discriminating in your spread differentials for final game selection, thus ending up with about half or less, or are you aiming at platinum, gold and silver selections?
myself, and others, do or have fiddled with computer projections, and they do work, but i have not seen anything that will spit out this many picks unless you are willing to sacrifice quality and thus end up with a so-so record after all is said and done.
something else that caught my eye this week: it seems like an automatic, for both human and mechanical computers, to pick phil/dallas under, yet it does not show in your picks. anything to do with the laugher in philly, or is it showing a neutral signal because of a previous high-scoring game in dallas? just wondering...
i do read some of your threads and know you have enjoyed a certain degree of success so far, but really want to throw this at you, from one 'capper to another and get your comments on it, if you will.
thanks
pep
