NHL DOGS : I WILL TRACK 'EM.

[TORONTO-VIGILANTE]

i know this will be a great task to do, but i feel that there is some value to it.
Gonna copy RANDERCITY'S idea and track 'em day by day.It's Sunday, so i got time to do it.

 

[TORONTO-VIGILANTE]

SUNDAY DOGS:

Pittsburgh +0.5 105 LOST
Edmonton +0.5 -125 WON
Tampa Bay +.5 -145 WON
Columbus +0.5 105 WON




[This message has been edited by TORONTO-VIGILANTE (edited 10-14-2001).]

 

[TORONTO-VIGILANTE]

saturdays' dogs

atlanta 110 LOST
detroit -105 WON
canadians 115 WON
rangers 130 WON
blues -130 WON
florida 130 LOST
clagary 165 WON
nashville 125: LOST
vancouver 105: WON
washington 110: LOST
boston 105 : LOST
T BAY 165 : WON

7-5 = +3.80 UNITS

not bad...the things that I'm trying to do here is to get these teams down to about 5-6 that will have the BEST chance of covering the spread when they're dogs....

Florida may be the first off the list...because they are just plain bad.

[This message has been edited by TORONTO-VIGILANTE (edited 10-14-2001).]

 

[TIME TO MAKE $$$]

Chris,

Call me

------------------
SEPT 11, 2001. THE DAY THAT WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.

R.I.P. TO ALL VICTIMS
We are in this together

 

[TORONTO-VIGILANTE]

RECAP:

DOGS last two days:

10-6 = +5.80 UNITS

 

[Never Caught Up]

TV,

Suggestion. Why not just use the moneyline and not the combo line. I don't consider +.5 -145 a true dog and if you mix the two you are going to have skewed stats.

NCU

 

[infinii]

I agree with NCU here because a +.5 -xxx probably isn't available to everyone at every book. So it's not really a dog in the true sense.

I think the nature of hockey lines makes this harder to track because there will be results based on moneylines and then results based on pucklines.

 

[TORONTO-VIGILANTE]

thanks for the input guys...
will do.