No interference but....

R-7

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 2, 2005
335
2
0
Ok. So even if not interference and deemed uncatchable... How is that not called a hold or illegal contactbeyond 5 yards?... Should have been one more play from the 13...
 

carp

Luv Teasin'
Forum Member
Oct 16, 2009
1,011
9
0
Right side
I had no money on this game, and could care less who won it, but agree without a doubt (in my mind) that there was SOME kind of penalty. The only reason it was deemed as "uncatchable" was Kuechly was draped all over Gronk so how could Gronk get near the ball? Sad night for the integrity of the NFL and it's officials. :(
 

Tenpin832

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 5, 2006
326
25
28
Michigan (west side)
Exactly my thoughts,seems like everyone talking about pass interference. Looked to me like they chose to call holding instead of pass interference on a few occasions during this game,5 yards vs spot foul a little more watchable to me as I'm getting tired of watching flag football
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top