O' Rilley, O' Rilley

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
My goodness what a guy. Buy my book he says. And if you have some one in service they get one free. Sounds like if I don't get you 60% this week end for your 50 bucks. I'll give you rest of season free. Right on.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
djv...

for somebody who criticizes o'reilly, you seem pretty obsessed with him....do you also dream about him ?
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,901
133
63
16
L.A.
djv...

for somebody who criticizes o'reilly, you seem pretty obsessed with him....do you also dream about him ?

That's funny. DJV generates about a tenth of the obsession on O'Reilly as Weasel produces over the NYT. But you've never once remarked on Weasel's obsession.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
After watching this I dont know how anyone could have any respect for O'Reilly....that includes everyone who worship the neocons. I would love to have layed his ass out. I cant believe that kid held back.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=3YgOLjHIwCs

What you gonna do trampled? You try to help people wake up but when they are simpleminded and naive there is no hope. This so called News station he is on is really an entertainment station. Guys that believe the crap they spew also are big supporters of those tabloid magazines. Just nitwits beyond help. It is why people around the world laugh at our stupidity.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,901
133
63
16
L.A.
I would think that DTB's Clinton obsession has to take the cake.
I wasn't going to say anything because I don't think he mentioned him for 5 days. Kinda like talking to a pitcher during a no-hitter. But now that you mention it - yeah - AR, why no comment on these other obsessions? Are they just more palitable to you or something?
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
I wasn't going to say anything because I don't think he mentioned him for 5 days. Kinda like talking to a pitcher during a no-hitter. But now that you mention it - yeah - AR, why no comment on these other obsessions? Are they just more palitable to you or something?

murphy...

no need to ask me the same question twice....i read your first post but couldn't answer you as quickly as you wanted i was on the phone.

i never commented on gw because i know you & other would take care of it.

fell better now....

just want to tell you i have some business to attend to so i may not be able to answer your questions quick enough to suit you.....but i promise i'll look for your further questions & answer asap.
 

JCDunkDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2002
956
5
0
L.A. Area
Does O'Reilly tell the kid to shut up at some point? Nice. I think he asks security to get him out of the studio, or something.

There is a good documentary film called, "Outfoxed" which has thoroughly detailed expose of this incident and others. It can be rented from a certain mail order film rental company. Good stuff.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,901
133
63
16
L.A.
murphy...

no need to ask me the same question twice....i read your first post but couldn't answer you as quickly as you wanted i was on the phone.

i never commented on gw because i know you & other would take care of it.

fell better now....

just want to tell you i have some business to attend to so i may not be able to answer your questions quick enough to suit you.....but i promise i'll look for your further questions & answer asap.
dude, it was 2 questions - first the nyt one, then the clinton one. i would NEVER bother you with redundancy. Let me repeat, NEVER.

yes, raymond - i fell much better now.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,901
133
63
16
L.A.
Does O'Reilly tell the kid to shut up at some point? Nice. I think he asks security to get him out of the studio, or something.
.
the funny part is that it's orielly who raises his voice and gets rude, yet he acts like it was the kid who was out of control. the kid was calm the entire time. if anyone needed to be restrained or have their mic turned off, it was the stupid potato head.

then the blowhard actually apologizes to his audience because he had no idea the kid was going to be so out of line. ...yeah, i guess he did owe his audience an apology - they were possibly on the verge of independent thought and seeing bill for what he really is.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,424
128
63
Bowling Green Ky
Wonder if this Oreilly bashing is a secular thing-
Every year the Harris Poll asks TV viewers for who they think is the best TV personality. Every year, Oprah is number one, and a bunch of the usual suspects are in the top 10. But the 2006 actually has a few surprises. Here's the list:

1. Oprah Winfrey
2. Jon Stewart
3. Bill O'Reilly
4. Hugh Laurie
5. David Letterman
6. Jay Leno
7. Ray Romano
8. Kiefer Sutherland
8. Ellen DeGeneres
8. Conan O'Brien

Facts sure would point to emphatic YES

Admittedly has a few personailty traits I don't care for but sure can't fault him for routing the secular progressives (liberals) :)

--and where have I heard the high-lighted part before-????

Behind the Get-Out-of-Iraq Movement
Tuesday , January 30, 2007

By Bill O'Reilly


ADVERTISEMENT
Over the weekend, tens of thousands of anti-Iraqi war people demonstrated in Washington, D.C. Not a huge showing, but a very intense, dedicated one.

The gathering was sponsored by a group called United for Peace and Justice, made up of primarily far left Americans, who believe the USA is doing a bad thing in Iraq.

Now many of the protesters say the Iraq war is illegal and immoral. Of course, they are absolutely wrong about the illegal part. After the first Gulf war, Saddam signed a cease-fire, which among other things, allowed the United Nations to inspect his military operations. Saddam violated that part of the cease-fire 17 times.

On the first violation, the USA and Britain had the legal authority to go in and remove him. As for the immoral part, here's what the far left is putting out there:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SUNSARA TAYLOR, ANTI-WAR ACTIVIST: A war of aggression is a war crime. If you haven't been attacked, you have no legitimate claim to self- defense, that it's preemptive, that's by Nuremberg standards a war crime. We should not commit war crimes. We should not be engaged in the illegal war in Iraq.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

All right, now Ms. Taylor believes that America has to be directly attacked to justify any military response. That is secular progressive, far left position.

This becomes problematic when a nation like Iran, whose president wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, violates the U.N. nuke treaty, for example, seeking nuclear weapons. But for the left actor Sean Penn, who consistently sides with America's enemies, that really isn't much of a problem at all.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PORTER BERRY, "FACTOR" PRODUCER: I'm talking about the Iranian nuclear program that the U.N. has told them to stop, but they haven't stopped their enrichment of uranium. And some are concerned that they might develop nuclear weapons. How do you think we could handle that kind of a situation?

SEAN PENN, ACTOR: By understanding that they're concerned that we've already developed nuclear weapons. And by talking to them having not defied the United Nations ourselves.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Now if I understand Mr. Penn correctly, and that is not an easy thing to do, he's saying that because the USA has nukes, Iran should be able to have them, or we should understand their quest. Incredible!

And then there's Jane Fonda, who is once again protesting a war. During the Vietnam conflict, Ms. Fonda actually rooted for the enemy to win. She did apologize, but has never really explained her thinking:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BERRY: Ms. Fonda, we just wanted to follow up on the question about the people who died. And after people died in Vietnam, what about - what do you think might happen to the Iraqis? Are you concerned about what will happen to the Iraqis if we leave?

JANE FONDA, ACTRESS: I'm concerned about what's happening to the Iraqis right now.

BERRY: What do you think about what happened to the three million Vietnamese and Cambodians who died after the U.S. troops left Vietnam?
FONDA: It's too bad that we caused it to happen by going in there in the first place.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

So according to Jane Fonda, America, we, caused the North Vietnamese to murder a million of their own people after the war was over and the Khmer Rouge two kill two million human beings in Cambodia after we left! We did that. Some force of nature somewhere.

Are you getting the picture here? You want more? Here's Susan Sarandon.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BERRY: One more question, Ms. Sarandon. Are you worried about civilian casualties in Iraq if the U.S. troops pull out of there?

SUSAN SARANDON: Do you know how many civilian casualties there's been already in Iraq? 650,000.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Six hundred fifty thousand? Well that's Susan Sarandon and the far left's number. The Brookings Institution, however, says about 59,000 Iraqi civilians were killed as of last July. The U.N. number is 150,000.

But it's clear, the war is a disaster for the Iraqis. That is certainly true. But "Talking Points" believes a cut and run strategy would be more disastrous and Iran would become an even greater threat.

Now the far left simply will not take that analysis into account. They dismiss it. Listen to Tim Robbins.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BERRY: Doesn't it maybe make the situation worse if we leave?

Yes, I think people are acknowledging that it's bad situation. But could it potentially get worse if we pull out of there?

TIM ROBBINS, ACTOR: No, I don't believe it can get worse than it is now. From what I hear from people that have been there, from the Iraq veterans that have come from there, they don't believe it can get worse if we leave.

BERRY: Even if Iran were to take over part of the country?

ROBBINS: Well, I don't know. You seem to have some kind of support for the war. You're pretty young guy. So maybe you should enlist.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Ah, there you go, Tim. Nice answer to a legitimate question. Maybe he should enlist. Very intellectual, Tim. Very, very good. Thank you.

Fonda, Penn, Sarandon and Robbins sincerely believe the USA is a flawed country with a bad foreign policy. And they have that right to believe that.

But it's also the responsibility of the press to put these people and their movement into context, to ask them those questions. And you heard their answers. OK, we didn't cut their answers. You heard what they had to say.

Now I have a question for you: Do you believe removing Saddam Hussein was a war crime? Do you believe Iran should have nukes because we have them? Do you believe the USA should allow Iran to dominate the Persian Gulf and threaten Israel? Remember the war Hezbollah started last summer? Iran financed it.

The far left secular progressive movement wants to give peace a chance at the expense of our national security, ladies and gentlemen. They despise Ronald Reagan. They generally admire Fidel Castro. They hate President Bush more than Saddam. They call for unilateral action in Darfur, but not against fanatical Muslims.

Maybe you can figure all of this out, but these people frighten me. If America had intervened in Europe in 1938, millions of lives would have been saved.

If America had prevailed in Vietnam, millions of lives would have been saved.

If America had preemptively attacked Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, 3,000 Americans might be alive today.

I can cite many more examples, but clear thinking people get the point. Truth is that Fonda, Penn, Sarandon, Robbins and the rest are entitled to their opinions, but I believe their opinions put us all in grave danger.

I don't like the Iraq war. If we could go back in time, we don't do it. We pick another battlefield. But far left thinking is insane. And that was the reason not one big name elected politician showed up at that Washington rally. Not one.

And that's "The Memo."
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Not sure what these protesters have to do with his latest blunder. And that list he's in with Entertainers. Those dreaded people on the right dislike. I'm sure if he keeps up as of late he will drop or fall off it. Or because folks wont take him seriously he may go to top.
Sorry AR I know you like him and I do a little. But this was just to good to pass up.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,901
133
63
16
L.A.
Dogs, you continuoualy miss the point. Nobody is saying O'Reilly isn't popular. WE KNOW THE STATS. We are just saying that he's a total asshole.

The only person on that list I like is Jon Stewart. ...and maybe Conan a little.
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
What is a "secular progressive"? Anyone who is not on the side of the moralizing religious right? Ok. Count me in. O'Reilly is such a pious man. Nevermind that he is a sexaul deviant who likes to harass his co-workers and an obvious asshole who has been caught repeatedly fabricating information. That's not relevant. What's relevant is he promotes god and country (to sell idiots idiotic books and promote his idiotic show.) That's ok though, the 2 top personalities are quality "secular progressives" so we are well represented.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top