I understand that you have an extremely high opinion of your opinion with your 15 years of "crushing the man", but I have to respectfully disagree with you regarding OSU having the best starting 5 in CBA. They have no size, and in the unfortunate event that they are matched up with a team with size, like UK or Kansas, they will get smashed. I also agree with WarEagle. There are not 6 teams better than KY. Experience definitely counts, especially in the backcourt, but athleticism will win more games. The Big 10 will not fare well in the tournament. I would argue that the SEC is the better conference this year, simply because of that fact. Mediocrity top to bottom is pretty much what the Big 10 has been for a number of years now. One of the best that the conference has to offer can be beat by a Bucknell in the tournament that counts.
The real intent of this post is not to debate the merits of one conference vs. another. I do respect your opinion enough to at least read your posts, but you need to get real and start posting %'s compared to your ORIGINAL BANKROLL. Too many gullible saps fall for your +85% hyped weeks. I understand that you have a "loyal following" that will come to your defense, and that Jack probably appreciates the traffic that you generate, but you have never been upfront with your success, or lack thereof. I am also not the first to hint at your lack of validity in the record-keeping department. And before your legion comes out enmasse to slap me down, I am not some sour grapes monkey that follows anyone's plays to the demise of my bankroll. Rather, I have been a follower of this site from its inception, and have nearly 30 years of sports wagering experience. I can handle your posting of nearly every game and total every day, but you need to show some responsibility and not mislead people who don't know any better. I guess your braggadocio lately I what I find a bit unconscionable. I also love how many local books in Minnesota always put out soft lines. Must be nice to have those type of outs. Guess you can consider this a public service message for those who flock to quick riches this time of year.
I wish you well in the Big Dance. Rock on Big Man. I'd invite you over for breakfast, but I know that you are allergic to juice.:toast:
Danny
The real intent of this post is not to debate the merits of one conference vs. another. I do respect your opinion enough to at least read your posts, but you need to get real and start posting %'s compared to your ORIGINAL BANKROLL. Too many gullible saps fall for your +85% hyped weeks. I understand that you have a "loyal following" that will come to your defense, and that Jack probably appreciates the traffic that you generate, but you have never been upfront with your success, or lack thereof. I am also not the first to hint at your lack of validity in the record-keeping department. And before your legion comes out enmasse to slap me down, I am not some sour grapes monkey that follows anyone's plays to the demise of my bankroll. Rather, I have been a follower of this site from its inception, and have nearly 30 years of sports wagering experience. I can handle your posting of nearly every game and total every day, but you need to show some responsibility and not mislead people who don't know any better. I guess your braggadocio lately I what I find a bit unconscionable. I also love how many local books in Minnesota always put out soft lines. Must be nice to have those type of outs. Guess you can consider this a public service message for those who flock to quick riches this time of year.
I wish you well in the Big Dance. Rock on Big Man. I'd invite you over for breakfast, but I know that you are allergic to juice.:toast:
Danny
