The kick must be a free kick: a kickoff, or free kick after a safety, but not the rare fair catch kick.
ONSIDE KICK
- Thread starter the addict
- Start date
so they coulda onsided it, recovered, scored and repeated.....and won the game
makes sense to me :shrug:
makes sense to me :shrug:
2 onside kick recoveries and two touchdowns in 40 seconds with no timeouts, when they havent scored one all night......Thats funny right there. LMFAOOOOO
bro what arent you getting?????
noone is saying they woulda done it the same way
all people are saying is that it was the only way for haurghbaugh to gaurantee the game was 100% over and he would be declared the winner
why risk losing/injury regardless of how unlikely...
that is why espn classic is around....because crazy shit happens at the end of games, that poeple say "never could happen"
sorry you lost...
but he made a coaching decision
noone is saying they woulda done it the same way
all people are saying is that it was the only way for haurghbaugh to gaurantee the game was 100% over and he would be declared the winner
why risk losing/injury regardless of how unlikely...
that is why espn classic is around....because crazy shit happens at the end of games, that poeple say "never could happen"
sorry you lost...
but he made a coaching decision
Who said I lost ??? LMFAOOOOOOOO
Let me get this straight......which is more likely.
1 Smith fumbles the snap trying to kneel , giving Seattle the ball back down 7.
2- Seattle kicks an onside 'PUNT" recovers. Goes down and scores a touchdown. Kicks another onside kick goes down and scores. All this with 40 seconds left and no timeouts
Let me get this straight......which is more likely.
1 Smith fumbles the snap trying to kneel , giving Seattle the ball back down 7.
2- Seattle kicks an onside 'PUNT" recovers. Goes down and scores a touchdown. Kicks another onside kick goes down and scores. All this with 40 seconds left and no timeouts
ok great if you won
but im guessin you lost
if you honestly cannot see how haurghbaugh made a decision based off likelyhood of injury and or a crazy ending, then perhaps you need to rethink it
WHY RISK LOSING ANY MAN ON A ALREADY LIMITED ROSTER WHEN YOU CAN JUST TAKE A KNEE AND WALK AWAY AS HEALTHY AS POSSIBLE....
:shrug:
WHY PLAY ONE SECOND MORE OF A GAME WHEN YOU CAN GET HURT AND OR LOSE, WHEN YOU CAN END A GAME RIGHT NOW AND GAURANTTE A WIN AND NOONE GETTIN HURT
ANSWER ME THAT
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY
HE DOESNT GIVE A FUCK WHO WIN S A BET
HE WANTS TO WIN A GAME AND HE WANTS TO STAY HEALTHY
END OF STORY
ANSWER ME THAT
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY
HE DOESNT GIVE A FUCK WHO WIN S A BET
HE WANTS TO WIN A GAME AND HE WANTS TO STAY HEALTHY
END OF STORY
rip up your tickket
you will get it back this weekend
as long as you quit betting on all the "fixed" games
seems like certain people only lose games because they are "fixed" or because vegas made a call.....
you will get it back this weekend
as long as you quit betting on all the "fixed" games
seems like certain people only lose games because they are "fixed" or because vegas made a call.....
Been betting for 20 years. Times I've seen an NFL team screw up a kneeldown? Zero. No fumbled snaps, regardless of what Schiano thinks..
didnt rivers do it last year?
but still this guy is crazy to think haurghbaugh made a bad coaching decision
man if fuckin tate coulda just got a first down with reaching another 6 inches we couldve avoided all this...
except then it woulda been seattle backers saying it was fixed and the chop block was "the fix"
Oh yeah, agreed. Rivers did do it. Although was that a kneel down?
Browns got 2 onside kicks a few years back too
Either way my point is harbaugh did it for football reasons, not because of a point spread.
Browns got 2 onside kicks a few years back too
Either way my point is harbaugh did it for football reasons, not because of a point spread.
And as far as tonight, Seattle was the right side. The safety would have been a fluke ending. 49ers weren't covering the whole game
Joe Pisarcik tried to hand the ball off, and fumbled; He was not taking a knee.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-FI28rJamY
Phillip Rivers fumbled the snap, but the Chargers had called a running play, and were not taking a knee.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWGCeMNmyV0
Wait!! Last year or maybe 2 years ago. Phillip Rivers fumbled a snap trying to run the clock out at KC and KC recovered and scored to win the game.....:142smilie But that was Rivers!!:toast:
None of you think this is remotely fishy especially based of the crazy line movement today?? :shrug: :shrug: :shrug:
agreed!
i think the late flag on an incorrect penalty awarding the niners a safety was fishy.
harbaugh declining the penalty was the right call for his team to win the game.
Listen rather then thinking th nfl is fixed, I would prefer to just think that haurghbaugh is a degenerate gambler like people accuse him of.
He took seattle +8 thinking it would be a knockout type game and hedge if they lost SU....least he wins money if they lose...
I would think a scenario like that is much more in the realm of possible when compared to an entire NFL game being fixed...
He took seattle +8 thinking it would be a knockout type game and hedge if they lost SU....least he wins money if they lose...
I would think a scenario like that is much more in the realm of possible when compared to an entire NFL game being fixed...
Cause it has been said that haurghbaugh loves to gamble...
Pete rose, make room in the hall of shame
Nah I doubt either scenario is true, and he just did it to benefit his team....
Pete rose, make room in the hall of shame
Nah I doubt either scenario is true, and he just did it to benefit his team....
