Pats will Win

mush

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 28, 2001
374
0
0
NY
This season, the Patriots are an impressive 4-2 ATS when pegged as a 'dog of seven or more points. That tells me either the team gets angry at the lack of respect they are being given and play harder, or they relish the idea of playing as such a long shot and therefore play looser.

And speaking of getting up for big games, New England is an impressive 7-1 ATS versus winning teams this season. Sounds like a collective effort that starts in the locker-room and rolls out onto the field.

Here's another fact you won't find in any box scores, but is a definite trend worth looking at: This season's Super Bowl is being played a week after the divisional championship games, as opposed to providing the traditional bye week for the underdogs to contemplate that role.

I call it the 'Self-fulfilling Prophesy Quicksand Syndrome'. Hear something often enough, and you start to believe it.

Of the 35 Super Bowls, five have been played on just one week's rest.

Of those five, the favorites have a poor 1-3-1 (25 percent) pointspread record.

The only pointspread win by a favorite -- Dallas over Buffalo in 1994, 30-13 as a 10-point 'chalk' -- was a close game for much of the way, and the Bills actually led the game straight up at the half.

The underdog has definitely been the play in Super Bowls played without a bye when the less-accomplished team has less time to think about how they may be outclassed.

And finally, despite what I said earlier, let's take a look at the game stats for a moment.

To add further credence to my belief New England will win SU, take a look at the Patriots straight-up record on turf this season (3-0).

Yes, the Rams are far and away the most dominant team in almost every offensive category. But something strange happened to both teams in Week 7.

On Sunday, Oct. 28, the Patriots lost to in Denver, 20-31. It was the most points the team surrendered all season.

And the Rams lost that weekend too, also giving up the most points of any game this season (34 to New Orleans).

It appears New England used their defensive breakdown as a wake-up call, because from that point on they've given up a stingy 13.8 points per game -- including playoffs.

St. Louis, on the other hand, never really recovered from its defensive letdown. Sure, they won games, but other teams saw what New Orleans did that Sunday to penetrate the Rams 'D', and copied it with success.

From that game until last week, the Rams were allowing a less than champion-like 18.1 points per game. Prior to that pivotal Saints game, the Rams were giving up just 13.5 points per game.

And you might be surprised to learn the Patriots passing offense has actually been better than St. Louis' over the last three games (228.3 compared to 225.7).

And New England outranks the Rams in every defensive category over the last three games as well. The Pats have given up 12 points per game over the last three compared to 18 for St. Louis. New England is allowing 286 yards against compared to the Rams' 298 over the same period.

Nowhere is the gap more prevalent over the last three than on pass defense. The Patriots are allowing 176.7 yards per game compared to St. Louis' 186.3.

Both teams have been about even in stopping the run over the last three (New England gives up 109.3 yards versus 111.7 for St. Louis).

And just an FYI for those of you out there who are still non-believers: Of the last four Super Bowls in which a team was favored by 10 or more points, just one covered the spread. Way back in 1995, the 49ers beat San Diego as a 19-point favorite, 49-26.

The other three occasions -- Dallas in 1996 (-13) and Green Bay in 1997 (-14) and 1998 (-11) -- resulted in an 0-2-1 ATS record for the 'chalk'.
 

JSMOOTH

They still suck
Forum Member
Feb 2, 2001
1,018
0
0
50
Ann Arbor, Ohio
Nice write up

Nice write up

I think along the same lines....maybe not a NE win, but a cover.
It won't suprise me a bit if NE wins this game, but I'll only have a small amount on the ML.

STL
Fast - Yes
Explosive - Yes
Invincible - NO
 

theGibber1

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 27, 2001
8,615
63
0
Dallas TX
i also like the Pats to cover. but winning outright i just dont see happening. I just dont see the Rams loosing on turf (just to fast)
not to mention their special teams are much better than the steelers. i do think the Pats D is good enough to keep the Rams from scoring 5 tds, but im not sure if the Pats O is going to be able to outscore the rams outright. lack of experience in a big game like this at the QB and strength of Schedule are also a conceren for me.

this team hasnt played a great O yet this season. but i do like the cover. i think rams by 10




ps. great write up, w/ tons of useful info. i really like the cover now:D
 

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
52
They've played some good offenses

They've played some good offenses

Who do you think they should have played, SF and STL every other week?

They played INDY twice and killed 'em both times. And they played STL, of course.

Also, steelers had a good O, a very good rushing offense. Oakland has a good offense, but of course they played in the snow. They also played Denver and got beat pretty good, but that was almost a different team.

Jets had a decent offense. They held them to 10 at home (in a loss) and 16 at the meadowlands.

They've played plenty of good offenses.

TheShrimp
 

thunderdoll

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 8, 2002
368
0
0
53
Mush, great write up. I also think the Patriots will win outright.

As for the Patriots not playing any good O teams.....seems to me a few of them were considered great teams before they played the Patriots. Like that team they played last week. :)

Without a doubt the Rams are the strongest team the Pats will have to face in the Tournament and the Pats are the strongest team the Rams will have faced. This is as it should be.

I look for a close game.
 

spanky2

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 23, 2001
1,483
0
0
toronto,canada
Nice work,don't see it your way though. It seems to me you are looking at 3 games WAY too much. You call that game against Raiders a game???That one goes right out the window for more than one reason(nice fumble)..:(
Anyway, You shall be a very well off lad after the game -getting $450 plus other nice plays out there at HUGE prices if you are on New Eng.
When should I phone you for a hand-out(ha) if you get lucky.
Good luck on your "SHOT"...RAMS = speed,that's all I know and I don't really use history or 'trend s' when I handicap my action... I really can't see N.E. scoring 35 points, but I AM betting that the Rams DO....:D
 

Scooter

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 3, 2002
1,481
0
0
Texas
Mush

I hope for your sake you take the points because thats the only way you have a chance to make any money ;) thats a very slim chance:D
 

bigbagrat

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
155
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
cbssportsline.com
Mush, excellent write-up, but, as much as I like stats I just don't see how the Patriots keep up with the Rams. Add to that Tom Brady is a first timer to the Super Bowl and WILL be nervous. If that fact leads to a turnover or two, then a score or two, how long will Bledsoe sit on the bench? Will that possibility get into Brady's head and actually cause errors? For NE, Bledsoe is the QB if they have to play catch-up. My loot is on the Rams and the over, this game will be a blowout.

Hope you Pats fans have some good props going for you.......LOL! Good luck to all.
 

edludes

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 25, 2001
3,592
38
0
alaska
Congrats Mush,you called it before it happened exactly as it happened!.Hearing about the short week factor was most helpful and got me off the Rams.Congrats to the Pat backers,especially WestcoastGuru who won 24 large on a pre playoff Pat future.
 

JSMOOTH

They still suck
Forum Member
Feb 2, 2001
1,018
0
0
50
Ann Arbor, Ohio
Congratulations, but....

Congratulations, but....

I too enjoyed your write up, but later, I found it at covers.com, written by Brendan Elliott.

At any rate, it was helpful, and some us made some good $.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Good for you. My St Lou by 18 went in chitter fast.:) ;)
 

hellah10

WOOFJUICE
Forum Member
Oct 24, 2001
7,958
0
0
44
Toledo
Excellent call mush...I was dead wrong...I thought the Rams would destroy them. Good game....
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top