Playoffs Round One

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
D'Antoni's record in the playoffs: 26-29

40% of his playoff losses have come against the Spurs, and one could easily argue that these losses came when he had a more talented roster than the Spurs (those Suns teams were really good).

It only took him about half the season to make adjustments so the Lakers to start winning. Can he make good in-game adjustments during this series? Coaching does matter (a lot) in the playoffs.

D'Antoni taking a strategy out of Karl's playbook and going with two PGs to start. Not sure if Nash can stay on Parker, or anyone. Should be an interesting game!

Pop vs. D'Antoni, round four

:0corn
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Saturday, April 20: 0-2 (-2.2)*

Sunday, April 21

The Spurs need to push the pace today against a team that does not want to run. They have a huge advantage in the open court, as opposed to when the Lakers get set up. The Spurs play the fifth fastest pace at home, and are in the top 10 in offensive efficiency, which translated into a season scoring average of 104.6 at home. The Lakers are in the bottom 10 in defensive efficiency on the road, while also playing at the second fastest pace, so that they gave up an average of 104.7 on the road this season.

Both match ups between these teams in L.A. were very low scoring this season, but in the game in San Antonio, the Spurs scored 108 points.

Popovich: "I've been doing this for a long time, and... Every. Single. Year. You hear the same stuff: 'Well, it's going to be half court now. It's going to do this. It's going to be that.' It just sort of fades away. Nobody has any proof of anything. It's just psycho-babble, really.

It slows down maybe in some respects because [of] defense, energy, anxiety. Everybody's out there playing their best basketball. When it gets slowed down, it's not a purposeful thing. It's just a natural progression of the way things go. Coaches and teams don't go into the playoffs and say, 'We're going to play slower. We're going to have fewer possessions. We're going to slow this thing down.' That doesn't happen."

The Spurs have the third best offense in the league, and they are one of the best at converting the pick n' roll, where they also get the majority of their points. The Lakers have struggled to defend this play all season, and even in the half court set the Spurs should be able to score. The Spurs have great spacing and side to side ball movement, and I think they will put on an offensive display today.


Spurs TT Over 100


Good luck...




*I actually get reduced juice on all my plays, but for purposes of posting I am using standard -110 taxation
 

JMize

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2010
3,327
8
0
West Seneca Ny
Followed ya....feel we have a shot . Lakers down 12 heading to.4th....will have to push the ball now...lets hope so.....need the Spurs as.well
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Followed ya....feel we have a shot . Lakers down 12 heading to.4th....will have to push the ball now...lets hope so.....need the Spurs as.well

Can't pick a winner right now - treading very lightly these first games.

Great call with the Spurs!

Cheers
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
The Thunder were leading the Rockets by an average of 11.7 points at halftime in all their meetings this season. They are the best first half team at home in the league, at +8.3 ppg, while the Rockets average -1.3 on the road. In the last ten seasons, in 71.4% of the first games in the first series, the #1 seed has been leading by 6 or more points at halftime.

Hopefully, the Thunder come out firing.


Thunder -6 first half


Good luck...
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Thanks Killa -



So far:

1 seeds won 100%, 100% ATS, 100% UNDER
2 seeds won 100%, 50% ATS (depending on line you got, could be push), 100% UNDER
3 seeds won 100%, 50% ATS, 50% O/U
4 seeds won 100%, 100% ATS, 100% OVER


Maybe we will see some upsets this round. So far, home favorites have dominated:

8-0 SU (+16 ppg)
6-1-1 ATS (again, depending on line you got in Celtics game)
3-5 O/U (average total 193.6)
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Round 1, Game 2

1 seeds won 95%, 45% ATS, 50% O/U
2 seeds won 85%, 60% ATS, 60% O/U
3 seeds won 85%, 60% ATS, 36.8% O/U
4 seeds won 70%, 55% ATS, 55% O/U



Also ran this -

Round 1, Game 2 (after winning the first game)

1 seeds won 93.8%, 43.8% ATS, 56.2% O/U
2 seeds won 81.2%, 62.5% ATS, 62.5% O/U
3 seeds won 81.8%, 45.5% ATS, 54.5% O/U
4 seeds won 75%, 66.7% ATS, 41.7% O/U
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Playoffs: 1-3 (-2.3)

Tuesday, 4/23:


Looking at the first games in many of these series, I try to see whether the performances by teams were typical, or if they were filled more with statistical anomalies. The first games in many of these series were outliers. The first game in the Bulls-Nets series provides a few examples. That was the first playoff game in Brooklyn since the 1950s, and adrenaline was running high. Gerald Wallace was an efficient 5-7 from the field, which is very unusual for him. The Nets outscored the Bulls in the paint 56-36 (40-8 in the first half), and the Bulls are the fifth best team at defending the paint. The Nets shot over 55% from the field, and this is just not going to happen normally in this series. Last night was more like how the this series should play out. When I look at the games tonight, this is the approach I use, and I think the Nuggets-Warriors game provides more examples of anomalies.

In the last game, the Nuggets only had five second-chance points, their lowest mark this whole season. The Nuggets were 7-for-30 from the field in one span of 18 minutes, which is uncharacteristic for the 5th best FGP team in the league. Denver shot 18.8% from beyond the arc and 64.3% from the line. The Nuggets scored under their season average for points in the paint, and were out-rebounded by ten. Even with all these factors, they were still up eight points late in the game.

The Lee injury hurts the Warriors a lot - he is their Faried, but even better... a constant hustler and playmaker. Landry can step in nicely on scoring and defense, but his presence also presents a lot of spacing problems, as both he and Bogut like to play in the low-post (which is why they only logged 53 total minutes together this season). In the first game, the Nuggets essentially just left Barnes opened and doubled on Curry with high traps, and also helped aggressively in the paint. They can use this strategy even more effectively without Lee on the floor. And now the Warriors are left with a bench of offensive bigs that can?t score in Green, Biedrins, and Ezeli. Perhaps the most important thing that Lee provides that these other players cannot is versatility and unpredictability. His player impact rating is 14.1%, and this is the highest rating for any player on his team (and good for 18th overall in the league).

Faried will play tonight, although he may not start. Karl said, ?In Game 1 we lost the rebounding game, and that?s something we don?t like to do, and he?s a key to maybe recouping that stat. And he?s contagious. His enthusiasm is contagious, having no fear is contagious, his competitive spirit is contagious.? Missing Lee?s 14 rebounds from the last game will have a significant impact on the Warriors, who rely on good defensive rebounding to maintain their possession margin. Denver is the best offensive rebounding team in the league, and this category should be swayed significantly in their favor tonight. The Warriors should play even more zone in this game, as it did bother the Nuggets, but Karl will make adjustments and the Nuggets should shoot better than their last attempts from beyond the arc.

All playoff trends are for the last ten seasons. Although none of these trends are eye-dropping, I will include them anyway. Teams playing as a road dog in the playoffs in the second game of a series are 7-21 SU (-10.8 ppg) and 11-17 ATS when they are coming off a loss where they had a 9 or more point lead. Road dogs playing against the same team in a playoff series are 11-41 SU (-9.9 ppg) and 16-36 ATS when they covered the spread by more than 5 points and the previous game also went under the total by 10 or more points. Teams playing in the second game of a series are 14-0 SU (+12.9 ppg) and 9-5 ATS when playing as a home favorite after winning the first game in the series but failing to cover the spread. Teams playing as a home favorite in the playoffs cover 57% of the time if they failed to cover in their last game.

The Nuggets have won 24 straight home games by an average margin of 12, and although they got a scare in the last one, I think they will win big tonight. During this stretch (not surprisingly), they are 71% ATS. The Nuggets are 13-1 SU (+16.9 ppg) and 12-2 ATS this season playing as a home favorite coming off a game that went under the total. They can easily fix their offense, and the defense is playing well.

Nuggets: 107-92


Nuggets -8


Good luck...
 

margwellus

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2005
337
8
18
Hippo, well you certainly right on with the Bulls, saying you wanted another game before declaring them dead to rights..wow, D Wil was invisible last night...one thing to look at in the Warriors/Denver game was points off of turnovers last game, which if my memory serves me correctly was hugely in favor of Denver, which I see evening out some tonite..not that the absence of Lee doesn't hurt them tremendously, but if Faried doesn't go much or at all I think the W's can keep it close. Faried is the X factor...do you know if he's going tonite?

stay hot Hippo :0008
 

the addict

BI-WINNING
Forum Member
Oct 9, 2009
13,034
116
0
39
PA proud
Goodluck HH...

Since you and jack made fun of my last attempt to become a poet, ill try again.



A capper and mother, both of which you are great
We said bulls are done, but you told us wait

Your own database, and daily write-ups
The haters stay away, cause she don't give a f@*&

Denver will roll, they are the mile highest
You are a fan, but never show bias

Anymore plays, that we should be aware
Cause playing against you, a wise man won't dare

When it comes to capping, you are the best
If cappers were toothpast, you would be crest (cause its the top brand incase you didn't get it)
 

margwellus

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2005
337
8
18
keep your day job Addict...if you gots one...:mj07:

just razzin' ya...bring more of your RAP to the mix!

Let's see what you can rhyme with LeBron....or Carmelo...or even Westbrook
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Thanks all.



addict - I hereby crown you the most improved white rapper at madjacksports. A rare and illustrious achievement.

I have found that so far, in game betting has been way better than pre-game betting. You can often get more favorable lines, and also see the flow of the game when betting. Trying to post a few plays here and there if I feel strongly, but the majority of bets I am placing have been and will be live in-game.




margwellus - Faried said on Monday after practice: "There's no 'Will he?' "

Karl said his minutes will be limited, but it is hard to contain a manimal for very long. :shade:
 

thomas_howard

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 15, 2007
1,167
15
38
Houston
Thanks all.


I have found that so far, in game betting has been way better than pre-game betting. You can often get more favorable lines, and also see the flow of the game when betting. Trying to post a few plays here and there if I feel strongly, but the majority of bets I am placing have been and will be live in-game.

I like to pick my side and look to do the same. team you're against gets hot early and has a run..the in-game lines can be absolutely nuts...
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
That was like the Milli Vanilli of analysis. It looked good and sounded harmonic, until you found out it was all fake.

What a performance by the Warriors. Curry is the freaking man. Still.

Not sure my type of capping is built for the playoffs. I base my plays mostly on situations, and I just am not sure it translates well into playoff scenarios. If something really good arises, I will post, but my plays will be few and far between. I will try to contribute any good information I find.

Best of luck

Halli Hippilli
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top