Playoffs Round Two

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Regular season posts:

ATS: 160-115 (+51.3) 58.2%
OU: 77-64 (+5.3) 54.6%
ML Dog: 5-12 (-0.4)

TOTAL: +56.2 UNITS, ROI: 11.8%


Post season:

Playoffs: 1-6 (-7.8)
Playoff Series 2-1 (+1.51)

TOTAL: -6.29 UNITS

___________________________________________________________


ROUND TWO SERIES, LAST TEN SEASONS

Sample size=230 games


In the last ten seasons in round one, individual games:

Home team SU 66.5%
Home team ATS 58.2%
Favorites SU 70.2%
Favorites ATS 57.4%
Home Favorites ATS 59.3%
Overs 53.3%

Round 1, ATS at home:

1 seeds 51.9%
2 seeds 66.7%
3 seeds 65%
5 seeds 35.3%
6 seeds 33.3%

Round 1, Game 1

1 seeds vs 5 seeds: 5-2 SU*
2 seeds vs 3 seeds: 7-4 SU*
2 seeds vs 6 seeds: 5-0 SU*




*Teams that have won SU in the playoffs in the last ten seasons cover the spread 83.8% of the time. Pick the winner, pick the cover. Even with favorites, they cover 76.7% of the time in the playoffs if they win SU.

This year has been no exception - teams that win SU have covered at a rate of 86.4%, favorites that win SU, have covered 80%.
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Pacers-Knicks

Discuss - George or Melo? Oh, that?s easy. And this is coming a person who?s dog is named Melo. I?m considering changing it to George. Just the ring of it is getting to me. Here George, here Georgie! Hmm....

Paul George has been a playoff beast so far, notching a spot as the fifth most effective player in the post-season, only behind names such as Durant, Lebron, Curry, and Paul. You have to jump all the way down to #27 to find Carmelo Anthony (right under Hibbert?s name), the first Knick to make the top 50. These teams split their season series 2-2, with the home team winning each match up. Carmelo missed one game, but in the three he played, Paul George held him to 22 points a game on 38% shooting. Melo is hands down the Knicks best player, but also a selfish, one-dimensional player, highlighted by his 1.8 assist average so far during the playoffs.

The Knicks have been winning all season by going with small lineups, and primarily using Melo at the 4 spot. This could be an issue against the Pacers, as they have two workhorses in Hibbert and West to contain on the front lines. In the three games Melo played this season, West had great games, shooting over 50% from the field and averaging in double figures. West is a relentless brute physical beast, and with Melo already ailing with a shoulder injury, putting him on West would have a negative impact on his offensive game (which is his only game). The one game West struggled in this season was when the Knicks started a frontcourt of Chandler and Camby. So, the Knicks may be forced to remove one of their guards from the lineup, play Melo at 3 and bring in a larger body on West. Of course, the fact that Melo played zero minutes with both Martin and Chandler in the lineup together during the regular season, and only one minute during the playoffs could mean a struggle to develop good chemistry - something that will be difficult against a good Pacer?s defense.

Felton has looked great during the Celtics series, but I think this was largely due to a complete meltdown by Bradley. Coming into this series, I expected a lot from Bradley as he has been a great defender all season. Bradley let Felton go right whenever he wanted, which is Felton?s only move - seriously puzzling. I don?t expect this will happen in this series, with the superb defense played by every player on the Pacer?s roster. The Pacers have stressed the importance of containing the pick n' roll, which is the Knicks best and most used play in their book. The Pacers should be up to the task, as they limited the Hawks to just .73 ppp on this play, a great average. The Knicks game is built around three things: 3 pointers, Felton?s ability to drive and dish, and Melo?s isolation game. I expect Felton and Melo to be way more neutralized in this series, and by the way - the Pacers were the #1 team in defending the three point line this season.

To sum it up, the Knicks basically rely on statistically terrible shots. In their defense, they are really good at making them. Melo and Smith are probably in the top five in the league at terrible shots taken. This leaves them vulnerable to lose at any given time. Melo was just 18 of 59 in games 4 and 5, and Smith was just 3 of 14 in game 5. I?m not even going to go into the Pacers offense, which I think will be fine, because they pass the ball well and have so many different weapons. This series is about defense, and the better TEAM.

Actually, on second thought, I'm going to keep my dog's name as Melo. After all, he is a moron who can't multi-task and runs around thinking he is the best dog in the world, when really I have other dogs that are way better than him. Sounds about right.


Series play: Pacers 2 units +165
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Grizzlies-Thunder

Westbrook haters, unite. He is gone. We can all breathe a collective sigh of relief. No more ball-hogging, out of control plays, emotional outbursts, arrogant style, egomaniacal playing. But wait, the Thunder are in trouble now? But we all love to HATE on Westbrook. No, no - we are not jealous that he has a never lose attitude, is one of the toughest players in basketball, an unbelievable athlete, a player who made his team better through both his playing style and his ferocity. No, we would never want a player with such swagger on OUR team.

Let?s face it - the Thunder are in trouble without him. Durant?s weaknesses (those two words just don?t look right together) are two: his inability to post up and the fact that defenders often deny him the ball so well. These are things that Westbrook was able to alleviate to a certain extent, because you had to pay just as much attention to him. Westbrook led the team in field goal attempts during the regular season, and there are just no enough good role players to step in and take the kind of attention that he did. The Grizzlies have great defenders, whether they throw Allen or Prince at Durant. In the 116 minutes they played together this season, Prince held Durant to just 39.3% from the field, vs. 66.7% when Prince was on the bench. Hollins could very well go with the theory - ?Just take everyone else out of the game and make Durant beat us single-handedly?. And Durant would try - he took 92 shots in the last four games after Westbrook went out, with his total points declining in each game. Just let Durant get his 30, and make everyone else beat them, because they can?t. The only way the Thunder win this series is if they get super hot from downtown.

Speaking of hot, the Grizzlies are SIZZLING right now, winning their last four against the Clippers handily, making them the first playoff team ever to lose the first two, then win the next four by double digits. As I outlined in my last series post, Conley is one of the best underrated point guards in the league. I would venture to say he is the best point guard remaining in the playoffs. In the last series, Conley destroyed the Clippers, averaging 17.3 ppg, and posting a total of 50 assists, 10 turnovers and 7 steals... 5:1 turnover ratio... DECENT! And this against Chris Paul - so what will he do to Jackson and Fisher?

Now, pair Conley?s ability with a Zach freaking Randolph down low, and the best center in the league in Gasol. Gasol will eat Perkins, Thabeet, Collison, whoever, for lunch. And if they choose to put Ibaka on Gasol, then Randolph will dominate. It is a no win down low for the Thunder. The Grizzlies were a team not afraid to trade away their ?star? in the middle of the season, and they became so much better for doing it. They have improved offensively since the trade, and in the playoffs they have ranked second offensively so far, putting up an impressive rating of 109.7. The reason for this improvement rests with Conley and his ability to have great turnover-assist ratio and feed Randolph in the post with perfect passes.

Let?s break down the advantages:

Conley vs Jackson = Conley
Allen vs Sefolosha =Allen
Prince vs Durant = Durant
Randolph vs Ibaka = Randolph
Perkins vs Gasol = Gasol

Bench = Thunder
Coach = Hollins (Brooks is a great motivator, but Hollins is way better strategically, making adjustments on the fly, and in overall command of his team)

Two final thoughts. The Grizzlies won two of the three regular season matchups, with their only loss coming when they were shorthanded after trading away Gay and before their new players arrived. Most important thing - the Grizzlies averaged 17.3 more shots than the Thunder in the season series. They control almost everything in this series.


Series play: Grizzlies 2 units -120
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Futures pending:

Pacers +1450 to win the East (2 units)

Pacers vs. Thunder in finals +2675 (1 unit)


Graded futures:

0-1 (-2)




Added last night:

Grizzlies +465 to win the west (2 units)



Was strange last night at 5dimes, they still had the Grizzlies at higher odds than the Thunder, even though the Grizzlies were favored to win the series? I bet it immediately, and today they have adjusted. Still like the +385 - reference 2011 Spurs vs. Grizzlies series to recall what they did to the Spurs in the post-season. And like I said before, the Grizzlies are the western conference team that has the best match up against the Heat, and the best chance to beat them, so I hope they get there.
 

grindstone

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
1,150
4
0
Futures pending:

Pacers +1450 to win the East (2 units)

Pacers vs. Thunder in finals +2675 (1 unit)


Graded futures:

0-1 (-2)




Added last night:

Grizzlies +465 to win the west (2 units)



Was strange last night at 5dimes, they still had the Grizzlies at higher odds than the Thunder, even though the Grizzlies were favored to win the series? I bet it immediately, and today they have adjusted. Still like the +385 - reference 2011 Spurs vs. Grizzlies series to recall what they did to the Spurs in the post-season. And like I said before, the Grizzlies are the western conference team that has the best match up against the Heat, and the best chance to beat them, so I hope they get there.



LOVE the GRIZZZZ IN A BIG WAY HH GL
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Sorry for the various grammatical mistakes in my write-ups yesterday - was in a time crunch.

Two telling pieces of information I came across today.

BJjdOLdCEAE4j13.jpg:large


Notice who's name dominates the list of players that shot under 40% in playoff games, and scored more than 20.

Carmelo Anthony playoff shooting


Carmelo Anthony has shot 35 of 110 in the last four games.
 
Last edited:

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Spurs-Warriors

All basketball fans are excited to see Curry, the emerging star, take the floor once again tonight. What a first round series he did have. 24.3 ppg, leading all playoff players with 9.3 assists, and shooting 43% from downtown. So far, he has been the third most efficient player in the post-season. The Warriors were +52 when he was on the court and -27 when he was off. He is the only NBA player in history to get 7 or more assists and make four three pointers in four straight playoff games. But still, I only called him a star and not a superstar. This is because amid all his spectacular play, Curry still had two glaring weaknesses, which were his turnovers and his clutch ability. The Warriors nearly blew games 3 and 6 against the Nuggets because they were so sloppy near the end of the games, which highlights not only their young age but also their playoff inexperience and Curry?s lack of leadership. The greatest players become better in the biggest moments, not sloppy. Reference Durant last night, as he took five of the Thunder?s final six shots (in possessions where he started with the ball in the backcourt) and made four of them. He had 12 fourth quarter points and touched the ball 15 times. Superstars get better in the clutch. The Nuggets had many chances to turn this series around, and they didn?t take advantage. But you can?t be sloppy against the Spurs, and give up big runs to them, because they will take full advantage. In his postgame interview, Curry said there was ?A lot of miscommunication and playing on their heels?, and this is exactly the type of chaos that the regimented, tested Spurs will exploit in this series.

The Warriors took advantage of Denver?s poor perimeter defenders in the last series, but the Spurs match up way better and will not have to trap Curry so much. Parker, Ginobili, Leonard, and Green are all tough perimeter defenders, and they can slow down the Warriors shooters and force turnovers. The Spurs were the best first round fastbreak team in the playoffs, and they will feast off of turnovers and long rebounds during this series. During the regular season, the Spurs forced 14.5 turnovers from the Warriors. The Spurs are just a way better defensive team than the Nuggets, and the Warriors offensive efficiency rating is not going to post astronomical numbers like in the first round. In the regular season, the Spurs starting lineup outscored the Warriors by 20 points per 100 possessions, which was mainly due to the fact that they held the Warriors to 17.3 points under their average scoring efficiency rating.

Some teams just own other teams, and some players own other players. Sure, it is different rosters, different coaches, etc, but you can look back in history and verify that this does occur for certain franchises - they just can?t beat certain other teams. This would be true for the Warriors against the Spurs. In fact, Golden State has never beat a Duncan manned Spur?s team in San Antonio (yes, that would span back for 16 years). Duncan in his career is 28-0 at home against the Warriors in games that he played in, and 19-6 in Oakland, adding up to a solid 47-6.

Let?s talk Timmy for a minute. His 36 minute scoring average this season is higher than it has been in eight seasons. His blocks per minute and free throw percentage are the highest they have ever been in his career. He is one of the quietest superstars in the league. He doesn?t get much media hype, but he is the nucleus of this championship Spurs franchise. Duncan will have his way on the inside with whoever guards him in this series, but he also knows when to pass and is one of the better bigs in the league at finding open players. The Warriors play good on-ball defense, but they are going to have a hard time against a Spurs team that passes the ball from side to side and executes multiple actions around the floor in pick n? roll situations. It is too much rotating for the Warriors to keep tabs on, and the Spurs have too many weapons. The Warriors were able to stymie the Nuggets by switching into a zone that really bothered them, but this won't work against a Spurs team that is much better at shooting and exploiting open space.

In the Warriors post-game interviews after the Nuggets series, they did not sound like a team on a mission, or a team convinced they could get to the finals. In fact, they were a team that was happy to be in their position, just happy to be moving on to get another shot. Curry said they were all relieved to finally win a playoff series. The Spurs have a completely different mentality. Duncan is having one of his best seasons in years, but he realizes that he is a superstar on the fall, not the rise. His chances of achieving the ultimate goal are limited. This team is bound and determined. The Spurs are mentally tough, and they know better than to take the Warriors for granted. Pop and other players stressed how good the Warriors were in their pre-game interviews.

The Warriors did accomplish something great by getting out of the first round, and now they may play that way. Both teams played above expectations in the first round. The Spurs swept their series, but have now had a few days off. For some teams, this may kill momentum, but for an older team like this I think it will help them recuperate. In the past ten playoff years, the Spurs are 6-0 in the playoffs when playing on four or more days of rest, winning by nearly 11 points per game. Starting with a win is always a good thing.

The Spurs and Warriors split the season series, but that means little to nothing. The Spurs lost in overtime on a back to back after beating the Clippers, and Tony Parker hobbled through the game. Then in April, the Spurs played without Duncan, Leonard, Parker, or Ginobili, and were still only down three going into the fourth, eventually losing by ten.

The Warriors are fun. They exemplify the new school in the NBA - young, fast, fiery coach, emerging star. The Spurs are the opposite - old school, same veteran players year after year, tried and tested coach, a superstar that has been there for 16 years and is having one of his best. This series is a battle between a team that is blossoming and a team that is ripe.

In the end, all things can't be equal. The team with the best coach, best superstar, and the best supporting players, will find a way to get this done.

Spurs in 5
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Great price on Grizz now Jess. GL the rest of the way

Yes, I agree. Durant completely owned that game in the fourth quarter, but the Grizzlies owned the first three. I don't see Durant being able to sustain that kind of effort over the course of a whole series. Some real bad breaks for them at the end, too. Unbelievable performance, but in the end, the Grizzlies still win this.

Cheers, and good luck to you as well!
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Not doing a write-up on the Bulls-Heat. I think I probably wasted enough words in my Spurs write up.

When I was younger, I lived by the philosophy that the less you talk, the more people will listen when you actually do talk. I probably talked enough today. Plus, does that series really need a write-up? Barring an alien invasion or some MKUltra mind manipulation, I think the MVP can bag this one.

Of course, always expect the unexpectable...



leejoo.gif
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
The Spurs playing as a home favorite of seven or more in the playoffs (average line -9) are 20-4 ATS since the 2004 season. Teams that sweep the first round and are playing as a home favorite in the first game of the next series are 12-5 ATS in the last ten playoff season, winning by an average margin of 14.2 ppg. The Spurs had the fourth best home court margin in the league this season, with an average margin of victory of 10.33.

I think the Warriors will have a harder time adjusting to the Spur's style from the Nugget's style, than the Spurs will have adjusting after their longer break. Plus, the Spurs were pretty much like playing a non-team in the Lakers. The Warriors may have a bit of a happy hangover, while the Spurs come out more focused.

Playoff teams playing on a week or more of rest vs. an opponent with less rest are 9-2 SU (+16.0 ppg) and ATS as a home favorite.

Spurs are 27-0 against the Warriors at home since the 1998 season, 18-8-1 ATS, average MOV 17 ppg.


Spurs -9


Good luck...
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
alien-invasion1.gif



Nate Robinson, whoa!

Chicago plays tough, hard, with heart every game. Can't be said for every nba team. Consider this - Jimmy Butler regular season: 82 games, 26 minutes per game. Jimmy Butler this postseason: Every game, every single minute in the last three.

Awesome!!
 
Last edited:

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Teams that swept the first round and then played teams with just 1 day rest are 9-1 with an average margin of victory of 20.8 ppg in the 7 game/series era.

So, don't think we can chalk this up to the "rust" theory. Flat outplayed.

:0074
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
I only called him a star and not a superstar. This is because amid all his spectacular play, Curry still had two glaring weaknesses, which were his turnovers and his clutch ability. The Warriors nearly blew games 3 and 6 against the Nuggets because they were so sloppy near the end of the games, which highlights not only their young age but also their playoff inexperience and Curry?s lack of leadership. The greatest players become better in the biggest moments, not sloppy.

4th Quarter, Curry's plays starting at...

3:57 GS up 104-88

3:14 Curry Turnover (offensive foul)

1:22 Curry 3pt Shot: Missed

47:9 Curry Jump Shot: Missed

1:8 Curry Jump Shot Missed




Got it, Curry is awesome. Some of those shots he hit were insane. But really, if we are going to sing praises of anyone this morning, why isn't there a thread on here about Robinson? He's the guy who got stitches on the sidelines during the game and came in and beat the best team in the league on their home court! In the end, winning is what matters.

Right, Wilt?


SCOREBOARD
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
The Heat have lost Game 1 of a playoff series three times during the "Big 3" era. In the two previous instances -- last year's NBA Finals and the 2011 Eastern Conference finals versus the Bulls -- the Heat swept the next four games.
 

ivabign

Tosser
Forum Member
Feb 14, 2002
3,492
7
0
Southern California
In the finals they were on the road at OKC, were they at home the other year? Do you know the margin of victory for the second game in 2011? At work, can't look it up.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top