BA, love it. I do the same, but one step further. I factor in the lines from the previous games. In this case, the total for their first two matchups was 136.5 and 137.5. So despite both going well over, the linesmakers saw no need to adjust the line higher.Lob, The thing I saw was that total should have been higher. The first game score was 165 2nd 150. why set so low135- It should have been higher. When I was a kid we used to call them sucker lines. That was about 55 years ago. LOL .If you look at Sat Brown vs Prin, 1st 70-60, 2nd 72 63. The line opened at 140-. Why so high? They know it was going over. So, I took over. I didn't post it though. Everyone has a different way of doing things. I try to get an idea what it should be. I hope that makes sense?
I feel your pain, the putt not going in on 18 cost me several thousand in the $25 Sunday showdown. Game of inches as they say, Great Tourney...BA n Smitty, appreciate the feedback.. when I see those "sucker lines" I will mostly just stay away.. you guys did right by betting it! EZ winner!
after Xander blew the Players w/bk to bk bogeys, I took 24 hrs off MJs lol, that won't happen again for 6 days!
still a fantastic tourney tho.. Scheffler, Wyndham and Xander all played great!
manana!
I’m starting to think Scheffer is unbeatable. He couldn’t hardly turn his neck on Friday and Saturday and still got to 20 under. He’s my Masters pick even if I have to lay oddsBA n Smitty, appreciate the feedback.. when I see those "sucker lines" I will mostly just stay away.. you guys did right by betting it! EZ winner!
after Xander blew the Players w/bk to bk bogeys, I took 24 hrs off MJs lol, that won't happen again for 6 days!
still a fantastic tourney tho.. Scheffler, Wyndham and Xander all played great!
manana!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.