Post-Palin Alaska has largest debt burden in US

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Post-Palin Alaska has largest debt burden in US
By Raw Story
Wednesday, March 31st, 2010 -- 3:12 pm

Sarah Palin has long sold herself as a fiscal conservative, arguing against the Democrats' health overhaul on the grounds that the nation simply can't afford it.

But when the former vice presidential candidate resigned as governor of Alaska in the summer of 2009, she left the state with a 70 percent debt-to-GDP ratio -- the highest state debt burden in the United States.

That's according to data compiled by the Washington Independent's Megan Carpentier, who notes that Alaska has a debt burden similar to "that of Jordan and Palin?s favorite health care resource, Canada, and a higher ratio than Ghana, Cote d?Ivoire, India, the Philippines or Uruguay."

By comparison, crisis-stricken California has a debt ratio of less than 40 percent. All the more confounding about Alaska's debt is the fact that it is an oil-producing region with a small population to share in that wealth. Oil-rich Alberta, Canada, for example, collects no sales tax and still managed to retire its debt entirely in 2004.

While Alaska's massive debt burden can't be blamed entirely on Palin's two-and-a-half-year stint as governor, she did face similar debt problems while mayor of Wasilla, and those appear to be of her own making.

Wasilla's municipal debt went from around $1 million when she came in to office, to around $22 million when she left, mostly as a result of the construction of a sports arena and public works projects championed by Palin.

While Alaska's debt load is high by the standards of US states, it's worth noting some nations have considerably higher debt loads. Japan, for example, is carrying a debt load of more than 190 percent of GDP; Greece, recently hit by a debt crisis, has a 108 percent debt-to-GDP ratio.

The debt load for the US federal government clocked in at around 53 percent in 2009; the debt is expected to increase to 68.5 percent by 2014.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
27,452
930
113
49
Earth
www.ffrf.org
Wayne: Wouldn't Chad's story be the most accurate? At least it is comparing apples to apples instead of total debt, which will almost always be topped by the most populated states. Just sayin'.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Wayne, does your story reference the debt to GDP ratio? Isn't that a good indicator of how a state is performing, compared to sheer overall debt, which would be skewed to high population states?

You guys were the ones holding up Palin as an accomplished business experience type - this seems to paint a different, yet accurate picture?

Better yet, why don't you start your own thread since your post is a different subject? I know some of your followers will not know the difference, but some here do...

Now, who is using the population ploy, Wayne? You, using sheer debt, or me, using a ratio of population to performance, which WAS the subject of my post?
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,493
256
83
Victory Lane
I think it had something to do with Palin buying all them clothes for First man Todd and her kids.

and all the airplane trips she took with family in tow,

and the house she built with taxpayers money

its really endless with her

glad she can make her millions on TV because we will never hear from her in politics again.

as usual DTB black gumby misses the point competely over his head.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,421
128
63
Bowling Green Ky
Wayne: Wouldn't Chad's story be the most accurate? At least it is comparing apples to apples instead of total debt, which will almost always be topped by the most populated states. Just sayin'.

Thats a valid question Gary--

Would depend on income per capita vs what was owed per capita.

Also amount owed.

If I had 50% chance of being paid I prefer to $50 on the books vs $500



Alaska is 4th in U.S. with $68,500 household income--the ave being $50,000 and the lowest $37,800.

Personally I'd take Alaskas debt with their natural resources over most other states.

I think Chads article was interesting and did bring to light issue that most of us were not privvy to--but the headline--

Post-Palin Alaska has largest debt burden in US

followed by--

But when the former vice presidential candidate resigned as governor of Alaska in the summer of 2009, she left the state with a 70 percent debt-to-GDP ratio -- the highest state debt burden in the United States.

--is grossly misleading
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top