*****Pretty Fricken' Impressive *****

Kelso

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 1, 2009
396
1
0
NHL FUTURE to win Stanley Cup

NHL FUTURE to win Stanley Cup

The Rangers were at + 1230 when they were down 3-1 vs Caps
 

oceanguy

oceanguy
Forum Member
Mar 24, 2007
1,484
3
0
Minnesota
Past performance is no assurance of future results...........


From another site:

"In seventh games of best-of-7 NHL playoff series, the New York Rangers have an active six-Game 7 winning streak overall, and have a 7-0 Game 7 record on home ice. No slouches in Game 7 either, the Tampa Bay Lightning have an overall 4-1 Game 7 record (1-1 on road ice). "

From what I've heard in interviews from Tampa players, they are saying they need to play it tight to the vest like they did in Game 5 and Lundquist is hard to score on in this type of game; thus the under appears to be a good play...........BUT, even if I'm right nearing the end of regulation , there could be a barrage of empty net goals if game is not tied at 2-2 or fewer. Also, these two are 4-2 to the over in this series.

BOL if you play it Hammer:0008
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
Hammer, you playin on the blue shirts? I have a +175 adjusted series price open and a +250 on the Rangers to win in 7, so I'm not gonna get involved any further. Curious to know if this post means you are betting on em tonight and if it's a two dimer...
 

hammer1

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 17, 2002
7,791
127
63
Wisconsin and Dorado Puerto Rico
Past performance is no assurance of future results...........


From another site:

"In seventh games of best-of-7 NHL playoff series, the New York Rangers have an active six-Game 7 winning streak overall, and have a 7-0 Game 7 record on home ice. No slouches in Game 7 either, the Tampa Bay Lightning have an overall 4-1 Game 7 record (1-1 on road ice). "

From what I've heard in interviews from Tampa players, they are saying they need to play it tight to the vest like they did in Game 5 and Lundquist is hard to score on in this type of game; thus the under appears to be a good play...........BUT, even if I'm right nearing the end of regulation , there could be a barrage of empty net goals if game is not tied at 2-2 or fewer. Also, these two are 4-2 to the over in this series.

BOL if you play it Hammer:0008


If you have read my posts in bases the last few weeks as to why i play what i play >>>>>? and you have witnessed the results........That past performance doesn't guarantee future results bromide i have shoved up the books ass >>>> all the way up to his tonsils...now u know how i feel......carry on...
 

hammer1

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 17, 2002
7,791
127
63
Wisconsin and Dorado Puerto Rico
Hammer, you playin on the blue shirts? I have a +175 adjusted series price open and a +250 on the Rangers to win in 7, so I'm not gonna get involved any further. Curious to know if this post means you are betting on em tonight and if it's a two dimer...


yes i played them ...as a shit play else i wd list as $200 which used to be $2000.. I like the Hawks for #200 but u do as u chose wd not tell you what to play in this game or tell you it approaches certainty
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
So how much is a "shit play" Hammer :shrug:
I get that you're playing 200 in MLB unless otherwise specified, but its hard to know how you rate a play from some of the posts like the first one in this thread. Obviously we know the amount you played on CHI tonight, which is looking good so far. Was considering the Blackhawks, so your post helped seal the deal for me to make a play. Hope it works out for us.
:0008
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top