Refs doing everything they can to keep the Zags close. UCLA vs GONZAGA

[T]

:shrug:

 

[JustFootball]

Really? I see it exactly the opposite. Refs allowing UCLA to hack and they're calling it very tight on Zags.

 

[T]

Really? I see it exactly the opposite. Refs allowing UCLA to hack and they're calling it very tight on Zags.

Interesting. You have Zags?

 

[ezpickin]

Confucius says What one sees is based on who that person bet on

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

 

[johnnyb.]

Really? I see it exactly the opposite. Refs allowing UCLA to hack and they're calling it very tight on Zags.

Me too, they called way more ticky tack fouls on UCLA. It should even out 2H.

 

[JustFootball]

Interesting. You have Zags?

You have UCLA? :mj07:

I just have overs, which is fine. But I can't believe anybody would have predicted this score and UCLA being this close in a game with this pace. What is really fascinating is that UCLA was intentionally running a half-court offense, late in the clock, playing **great** d against Zags, and we still have an 89! point half with Zags barely leading.

Who knows what to expect 2h, but I am thinking Zags -8' and maybe over. There won't be any foot-off-the-gas in this one--the Zags know they are in a legit contest. My thinking is that UCLA won't hit as many key shots in 2H including 3's and end of clock prayers. Also, as announcers noted. UCLA starters have extensive minutes in the dance--that could start to show in the 2H as you know Zags will always push it.

I see UCLA hanging a bit longer, Few making some adjustments--esp on D, and a 4-5 point game up to the 5:00 mark suddenly turning into a 10-12 point game. But UCLA deserves huge credit--best test all season for Zags except for BYU.

 

[T]

Me too, they called way more ticky tack fouls on UCLA. It should even out 2H.

That's what I am saying they are calling tons of BS calls on UCLA.