- Jun 11, 2007
- 4,564
- 3
- 0
Its shame, first shw was the savior of the republican party, and now hes being blamed for the loss that the republicans are gonna suffer...everyone and there mom knew that she wasnt the best choice for VP but the republicans found everything good to like in her and didnt think far enough ahead or didnt want to think she could have a downside to her and now they are gonna place the blame at her feet? Well they should be blaming McCain camp and himself for not sticking to the game plan of experience as well. Though this was funny.......
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/15073
John McCain's campaign is looking for a scapegoat. It is looking for someone to blame if McCain loses on Tuesday.
And it has decided on Sarah Palin.
In recent days, a McCain ?adviser? told Dana Bash of CNN: ?She is a diva. She takes no advice from anyone.?
Imagine not taking advice from the geniuses at the McCain campaign. What could Palin be thinking?
Also, a ?top McCain adviser? told Mike Allen of Politico that Palin is ?a whack job.?
Maybe she is. But who chose to put this ?whack job? on the ticket? Wasn?t it John McCain? And wasn?t it his first presidential-level decision?
And if you are a 72-year-old presidential candidate, wouldn?t you expect that your running mate?s fitness for high office would come under a little extra scrutiny? And, therefore, wouldn?t you make your selection with care? (To say nothing about caring about the future of the nation?)
McCain didn?t seem to care that much. McCain admitted recently on national TV that he ?didn?t know her well at all? before he chose Palin.
But why not? Why didn?t he get to know her better before he made his choice?
It?s not like he was rushed. McCain wrapped up the Republican nomination in early March. He didn?t announce his choice for a running mate until late August.
Wasn?t that enough time for McCain to get to know Palin? Wasn?t that enough time for his crackerjack ?vetters? to investigate Palin?s strengths and weaknesses, check through records and published accounts, talk to a few people, and learn that she was not only a diva but a whack job diva?
But McCain picked her anyway. He wanted to close the ?enthusiasm gap? between himself and Barack Obama. He wanted to inject a little adrenaline into the Republican National Convention. He wanted to goose up the Republican base.
And so he chose Palin. Is she really a diva and a whack job? Could be. There are quite a few in politics. (And a few in journalism, too, though in journalism they are called ?columnists.?)
As proof that she is, McCain aides now say Palin is ?going rogue? and straying from their script. Wow. What a condemnation. McCain sticks to the script. How well is he doing?
In truth, Palin?s real problem is not her personality or whether she takes orders well. Her real problem is that neither she nor McCain can make a credible case that Palin is ready to assume the presidency should she need to.
And that undercuts McCain?s entire campaign.
This was the deal McCain made with the devil. In exchange for energizing his base by picking Palin, he surrendered his chief selling point: that he was better prepared to run the nation in time of crisis, whether it be economic, an attack by terrorists or, as he has been talking about in recent days, fending off a nuclear war.
?The next president won?t have time to get used to the office,? McCain told a crowd in Miami on Wednesday. ?I?ve been tested, my friends, I?ve been tested.?
But has Sarah Palin?
I don?t believe running mates win or lose elections, though some believe they can be a drag on the ticket. Lee Atwater, who was George H.W. Bush?s campaign manager in 1988, told me that Dan Quayle cost the ticket 2 to 3 percentage points. But Bush won the election by 7.8 percentage points.
So, in Atwater?s opinion, Bush survived his bad choice by winning the election on his own.
McCain could do the same thing. But his campaign?s bad decisions have not stopped with Sarah Palin. It has made a series of questionable calls, including making Joe the Plumber the embodiment of the campaign.
Are voters really expected to warmly embrace an (unlicensed) plumber who owes back taxes and complains about the possibility of making a quarter million dollars a year?
And did McCain?s aides really believe so little in John McCain?s own likability that they thought Joe the Plumber would be more likable?
Apparently so. Which is sad.
We in the press make too much of running mates and staff and talking points and all the rest of the hubbub that accompanies a campaign.
In the end, it comes down to two candidates slugging it out.
Either McCain pulls off a victory in the last round or he doesn?t.
And if he doesn?t, he has nobody to blame but himself.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/15073
John McCain's campaign is looking for a scapegoat. It is looking for someone to blame if McCain loses on Tuesday.
And it has decided on Sarah Palin.
In recent days, a McCain ?adviser? told Dana Bash of CNN: ?She is a diva. She takes no advice from anyone.?
Imagine not taking advice from the geniuses at the McCain campaign. What could Palin be thinking?
Also, a ?top McCain adviser? told Mike Allen of Politico that Palin is ?a whack job.?
Maybe she is. But who chose to put this ?whack job? on the ticket? Wasn?t it John McCain? And wasn?t it his first presidential-level decision?
And if you are a 72-year-old presidential candidate, wouldn?t you expect that your running mate?s fitness for high office would come under a little extra scrutiny? And, therefore, wouldn?t you make your selection with care? (To say nothing about caring about the future of the nation?)
McCain didn?t seem to care that much. McCain admitted recently on national TV that he ?didn?t know her well at all? before he chose Palin.
But why not? Why didn?t he get to know her better before he made his choice?
It?s not like he was rushed. McCain wrapped up the Republican nomination in early March. He didn?t announce his choice for a running mate until late August.
Wasn?t that enough time for McCain to get to know Palin? Wasn?t that enough time for his crackerjack ?vetters? to investigate Palin?s strengths and weaknesses, check through records and published accounts, talk to a few people, and learn that she was not only a diva but a whack job diva?
But McCain picked her anyway. He wanted to close the ?enthusiasm gap? between himself and Barack Obama. He wanted to inject a little adrenaline into the Republican National Convention. He wanted to goose up the Republican base.
And so he chose Palin. Is she really a diva and a whack job? Could be. There are quite a few in politics. (And a few in journalism, too, though in journalism they are called ?columnists.?)
As proof that she is, McCain aides now say Palin is ?going rogue? and straying from their script. Wow. What a condemnation. McCain sticks to the script. How well is he doing?
In truth, Palin?s real problem is not her personality or whether she takes orders well. Her real problem is that neither she nor McCain can make a credible case that Palin is ready to assume the presidency should she need to.
And that undercuts McCain?s entire campaign.
This was the deal McCain made with the devil. In exchange for energizing his base by picking Palin, he surrendered his chief selling point: that he was better prepared to run the nation in time of crisis, whether it be economic, an attack by terrorists or, as he has been talking about in recent days, fending off a nuclear war.
?The next president won?t have time to get used to the office,? McCain told a crowd in Miami on Wednesday. ?I?ve been tested, my friends, I?ve been tested.?
But has Sarah Palin?
I don?t believe running mates win or lose elections, though some believe they can be a drag on the ticket. Lee Atwater, who was George H.W. Bush?s campaign manager in 1988, told me that Dan Quayle cost the ticket 2 to 3 percentage points. But Bush won the election by 7.8 percentage points.
So, in Atwater?s opinion, Bush survived his bad choice by winning the election on his own.
McCain could do the same thing. But his campaign?s bad decisions have not stopped with Sarah Palin. It has made a series of questionable calls, including making Joe the Plumber the embodiment of the campaign.
Are voters really expected to warmly embrace an (unlicensed) plumber who owes back taxes and complains about the possibility of making a quarter million dollars a year?
And did McCain?s aides really believe so little in John McCain?s own likability that they thought Joe the Plumber would be more likable?
Apparently so. Which is sad.
We in the press make too much of running mates and staff and talking points and all the rest of the hubbub that accompanies a campaign.
In the end, it comes down to two candidates slugging it out.
Either McCain pulls off a victory in the last round or he doesn?t.
And if he doesn?t, he has nobody to blame but himself.
