Sat 10/20

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
6-3 +6.6 units

Texas Tech -1 4 units


Before the season even started this game was going to be my biggest play of the year. It's still my biggest but I'm not playing it for quite as much as I would have given the big game vs. WVU last week. I think the fact that it ended up being a blow out helps Tech more than if it was close and they would have had to fight the whole way thru.

I look at several things when it comes to taking a game and one of the big things is either the desire to play a game or what looks like a potential for lack of desire. Starting in spring ball every defensive player for Tech has had up three letters in their locker room. TCU! The defensive players want this game and want it badly.

Last year Tech upset then #1 OU in Norman. It was a great game for the team but OU scored 38 in the game. After the game in the locker room the team was celebrating and having fun. Chad Glasgow, first year DC, came in and laid into the D. He told them that the team won but it was no thanks to them and that they played a horrible game. Basically had them all sit down and went off on them telling them how bad they were. Apparently at that moment he lost he defense and they stopped playing for him. Not only did they not want to play for him but they all wanted him gone and it was one of the big reasons he only lasted one year. Now he's back at TCU and the D is wanting to prove to him that they didn't deserve what he had told them in the happiest moment of their year.

From what I was told last week the offense has taken up the cause as well and wants to make a big showing for the D. The team is truely a "team" this year and the players are tight.

Normally it's hard to say what 18-22 year olds are going to be like week to week but I can promise you these guys will be ready to play. Last weeks game vs. WVU did nothing but make them more confident in themselves.
 

Irish

Green&Orange
Forum Member
Jan 8, 2004
3,850
16
0
47
OH
Wood
Best of luck but be aware. They were very up for the WVU game now they travel to TCU a team starting to come together after Pachall was dismissed. Next on deck for Tech is Kansas St. A scary situation. Just FYI

As you can see I'm not posting cause I was cold so take this with a grain of salt.

Cheers
Irish
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
Irish, I'm aware of it but like I said in my post I'm not worried about it. This is the game the D had circled from the get go.

IMO if you take away the fact that I know Tech will be very up for this game is that I think it sets up pefectly for an over reaction to the way TCU is playing. Everyone looks at the Baylor game and sees the young QBs stats and thinks they're coming together. Look at EVERY QBs stats vs that D and you'll see that it's not a big deal. Now look at the week before and see how those stats were at home vs. a decent D in Iowa State.

In a normal year I would be all over TCU. This year it's different because of Glasgow.

My big worry is the health of Amaro. I've said in many post that he's the difference make for this offense. Saturday showed what he can do. The problem is he spent the night in the hospital Saturday. It's not known whether he'll be ready or not.
 

capping-guru

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2011
8,888
26
0
GL on Tech this week. As Cie mentioned, a couple of factors going TCU's way that has me on the other side.
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
GL on Tech this week. As Cie mentioned, a couple of factors going TCU's way that has me on the other side.


Thanks Bud! I understand why you all would be on the other side. I'll keep everyone up to date with how practices are going. I was told last week all week that we were dialed in. We'll see what they have to say this week. If practices aren't good then I might buy out of my play. If it's true and the players are wanting this game bad then I'll hold on to it and might up it.
 

capping-guru

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2011
8,888
26
0
Thanks Bud! I understand why you all would be on the other side. I'll keep everyone up to date with how practices are going. I was told last week all week that we were dialed in. We'll see what they have to say this week. If practices aren't good then I might buy out of my play. If it's true and the players are wanting this game bad then I'll hold on to it and might up it.

Info like that always proves to be very good, so post when you can for sure. I could very well do the same and flip the other way if you see and hear solid stuff on the Tech team from practice!
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
Going to start posting some stats. Will look for reasons to back TCU as well so if anyone see's anything please let me know. I've never minded buying out of big play. Would rather win one I bought out of than lose one that I didn't look at the whole picture on.


Tech's D is holding teams well below their season numbers.

WVU 75% of their season yard average
OU 75% of their season yard arerage
ISU 55% of their season yard average
NewMex 37% of their season yard average

It's hard to cap the TCU offense with the youngster only giving us two games. I almost don't want to count his first game vs. ISU because of all of the jitters he had to have. But, the only other game is against the WORST D in big boy football. Tech's Dline got a great push against the WVU Oline. They didn't get one vs. OUs.

Saying all of that, TCU put up good numbers in their loss to ISU even though it was the kids first start. But did he put up good numbers because he was taking a lot of chances. Getting good offensive numbers is a lot more difficult for a team when they protect the ball more. He had 3 INTs in the game.
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
How have TCUs three Big 12 offensive teams done vs. their d

Kansas averages 5.07 YPP and got 5.85 against TCU.
Iowa St averages 4.92 and got 6.14 against TCU.
Baylor averages 7.43 and got 7.85 against TCU.

All three gained more yards per play than their average when facing TCU.



Techs Big 12 stats come vs. ISU(same as TCU, OU and WVU)

So you have a TCU D that isn't holding three of the bad Big 12 teams below their averages while Tech is holding one of the same teams and two of the top offensive teams below their averages.


If this holds true the Tech O should have better than their season averages and TCU under their season offensive averages.
 

joefrog91

Rah, Rah, TCU!
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2002
4,402
8
0
56
Waco, TX
Good info Wood. I will offer this.

Even though Boykin played a whole half against Grambling, he really hadn't practiced with the first team offense leading up to games. He had 1 day of practice at QB for his first start against Iowa St. He had been practicing at RB the other days because of Tucker being hurt. He still racked up some decent stats.

You saw what he did with a full week to prepare for Baylor's defense. And I agree they are porous on defense. But, did anyone really believe TCU would hang 49 on them?

The difference was no turnovers. The Kansas, Virginia, SMU and Iowa St games would have all been 40+ point games for TCU if they hadn't turned the ball over. Fumbles or interceptions inside the 5 yard line were happening multiple times a game.

Rumor has it Boykin is viewed as a leader by the team while Casey was not. Boykin kept high-fiving his OL all night. Something Casey apparently never did. Now, I don't know if it's true that Casey wasn't trusted by the team, but they sure seemed to rally behind Boykin.

TCU has had this game circled as well since Tech backed out twice on TCU. Tubbs didn't help Tech's cause by saying "TCU is not a team we need to be playing right now." TCU players read Killerfrogs.com and see what Tech fans have to say about TCU. They are ready for this game as well.

As far as injuries go, Maponga's status will be released tomorrow during Coach Patterson's press conference. He appeared to have injured his ankle during the Baylor game and never returned. He was walking around fine though on the sidelines. Didn't seem to be limping.

Tucker was still nursing his ankle injury. I'm sure he'll be used sparingly again.
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
Good info Wood. I will offer this.

Even though Boykin played a whole half against Grambling, he really hadn't practiced with the first team offense leading up to games. He had 1 day of practice at QB for his first start against Iowa St. He had been practicing at RB the other days because of Tucker being hurt. He still racked up some decent stats.

You saw what he did with a full week to prepare for Baylor's defense. And I agree they are porous on defense. But, did anyone really believe TCU would hang 49 on them?

The difference was no turnovers. The Kansas, Virginia, SMU and Iowa St games would have all been 40+ point games for TCU if they hadn't turned the ball over. Fumbles or interceptions inside the 5 yard line were happening multiple times a game.

Rumor has it Boykin is viewed as a leader by the team while Casey was not. Boykin kept high-fiving his OL all night. Something Casey apparently never did. Now, I don't know if it's true that Casey wasn't trusted by the team, but they sure seemed to rally behind Boykin.

TCU has had this game circled as well since Tech backed out twice on TCU. Tubbs didn't help Tech's cause by saying "TCU is not a team we need to be playing right now." TCU players read Killerfrogs.com and see what Tech fans have to say about TCU. They are ready for this game as well.

As far as injuries go, Maponga's status will be released tomorrow during Coach Patterson's press conference. He appeared to have injured his ankle during the Baylor game and never returned. He was walking around fine though on the sidelines. Didn't seem to be limping.

Tucker was still nursing his ankle injury. I'm sure he'll be used sparingly again.


Joe, the Baylor game is exactly the reason why I said it's hard to figure out the TCU offense. We're not talking about playing against a bad D, it's the worst. I know he can put up the yards but how many chances does he take doing it. Was the ISU game abberation or is the kid a risk taker that will put up big yards but also turn the ball over while he's doing it.

All I can go by is what the Tech D has done to teams. So far, so good but he does present problems the others haven't. Tech had no worries about Gino tucking the ball and running. Jantz isn't a good enough passer that they had to worry about that so they shut down the running game.

Tubs has shut down practice before, during and after to the media this week. He hasn't done that before so this ads a little wrinkle to things.

Good luck Joe, I'm glad we're finally having this game every year!
 

joefrog91

Rah, Rah, TCU!
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2002
4,402
8
0
56
Waco, TX
Yes, those are valid questions. I would not call Boykin a risk taker. But two games really isn't enough to go on.

The one common opponent stats are misleading as well. Two different QBs played for Iowa St. So I look at how the offense did in those games.

Doege had 331 yrds, 3 TD, 2 INT
Boykin had 270 yrds, 1 TD, 3 INT

Tech had 395 total yrds and 24 pts
TCU had 455 total yrds and 23 pts

TCU fumbled out the back of the endzone once so the score would have been more. The offenses are comparable. So, this will come down to defense. I don't think we'll see another 12-3 game, but it should be interesting.

I'm so ready to watch this game.
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
Tech won't know if TE Amaro will play until Saturday. They're not saying what he's suffering from word is that it's a lacerated spleen. As I've said in my previous post, he's a big difference maker for Tech. His size, speed and hands are all awesome. Not having him will be a big loss. I don't expect him to play from everything I've heard. Although he did keep playing in the WVU game after the hit that caused it.
 

joefrog91

Rah, Rah, TCU!
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2002
4,402
8
0
56
Waco, TX
Tech won't know if TE Amaro will play until Saturday. They're not saying what he's suffering from word is that it's a lacerated spleen. As I've said in my previous post, he's a big difference maker for Tech. His size, speed and hands are all awesome. Not having him will be a big loss. I don't expect him to play from everything I've heard. Although he did keep playing in the WVU game after the hit that caused it.

He was the one player that really concerned me. Passes to TEs usually go for big plays against TCU.
 

joefrog91

Rah, Rah, TCU!
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2002
4,402
8
0
56
Waco, TX
Wood, is it true the Tech center got a PI charge? Saw someone mention a post on raiderpower.com. He will be out, right?
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
Joe, I'm pretty sure he did.

If he did get one I'm not sure what would happen. I think it might depend on the situation and what he was doing to get one.

IMO this is one of those that the coaches handle behind closed doors. Whether that's running bleachers or something I don't know.

The reason I say it might depend on what he was doing is because IMO that matters. I got a PI when I was in school at Tech. I was standing on the corner waiting on my girlfriend to pick me up. The cop pulled up, asked what I was doing and if I was drunk. I told him I was drunk and because of that I was waiting on my girlfriend to pick me up. He said "no need to wait, I'll take you right now." He then arrested me and now I have a PI in my past.

He may very well be supsended but the truth is he's of age and it was a Saturday night. I don't think anyone assumes some of the players aren't out having a good time like normal college kids.

Now if he was being an AHole raising cane then from what I've seen of Tubs is that he'll be suspended.
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
Joe, how hard is it to get to the stadium?

I want to take my wife and kids but my daughter has a soccer game that goes until 2. We would skip it but it's one of her FC Dallas games and against a team they need to beat. Does the train run near the stadium? I have no clue, I've never been over there. Actually I've only been over to FTW a few times in my life so I don't have a clue where anything is located. I know we would be late but I'm wondering if we would be real late or not.
 

joefrog91

Rah, Rah, TCU!
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2002
4,402
8
0
56
Waco, TX
The only reason I asked was because I thought Tubbs had a zero tolerance policy. I also understand fighting was involved.

Anyway, TCU DE Maponga is day to day and will need surgery after the season. Probably means he's out. Coach Patterson mentioned taking RS off another DE.
 

joefrog91

Rah, Rah, TCU!
Forum Member
Nov 13, 2002
4,402
8
0
56
Waco, TX
You won't get near the stadium that late. Best bet may be where I park this season. McKinney Bible Church on Hulen. It's free and shuttle takes you to back of stadium.

From the TRE website.

The TRE runs to the ITC or T&P station where you connect to the T's Route 7 and shuttle to the game. Shuttle runs every 15 minutes to the stadium.

Never had to use it so not sure how it works.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top