Argument about the Oklahoma St. line?
Argument about the Oklahoma St. line?
Yeah, add 2 more weiners!
Looking back to when I started posting again, 1/10 21 ?, it looks like ->IF I tried my "bestest" to pick a LOSSAH with slightly shaved pts to lose.... the dang team would WIN!
I posted the Cowboys too and here's what I found after checking it out :
Mon, Jan 25 7:17 PM ET (ET)
-6.0 -110
6.0 -109
Mon, Jan 25 1:27 PM ET (ET)
-3.5 -112
3.5 -108
Mon, Jan 25 9:16 AM ET (ET)
-3.0 -112
3.0 -108
Mon, Jan 25 1:16 AM ET (ET)
-2.5 -112
2.5 -109
It actually opened at -2.5 and took a hellovah JUMP after 1:27 all the way to -6 at 7:17
I got it at -3.5.
I won't jump into this thread again, AL.
MAYBE start a new one tomorrow, I can't take all the credit for so many weiners because many of those weiners looked VERY MUCH like loosahs with 2 mins left in their games. I DO take the credit for hitting the right amount of "point stuffers" to adjust the line; rarely more that 4 or 5, if you/me is convinced the pick will WIN jumping to a TEASER and add a team or two is the risk I take. I''ve been using parlays a lot because most of the time I didn't need a " stuffer" at all. Look at today's covers and that's why I post here for reg. line players.
I've been told to bet heavier and sho wish I did; Man, can't imagine how big the bankaroo would be. Three figure bets never agreed with me and I do one close to 'NEVER". Last one wasn't long ago though $100 ... the team? well, not really.... the guy is more appropriate.. Donald Trump is his name.
GL