Scott for USC

Iowa Child

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 28, 2002
158
0
0
Scott, I feel for you, going to get locked out of the championship game due to a bullshvt system. Hopefully this will put more pressure on having an 8 or 16 team playoff, using the bowl games as playoff games. And if Oklahoma loses tonight, I wonder if all the people who protested against Nebraska 3 years ago for getting to NC game without winning the conference are going to protest Oklahoma doing the same.
 

Mr Hockey

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
2,098
0
0
I doubt they will protest as much because Nebraska had more losses then Oklahoma would have if they happen to go down.


Look at how pathetic this is:


USC is only #2 because they lost before LSU, yet if Oklahoma losses tonight, they most likely still go to the title game yet they would have lost later then LSU & USC. What the hell kind of system is this!!!!!!!! If Oklahoma goes down which is a big if & LSU holds on to win then I don't see how LSU or USC should be left out. I don't know common sense would dictate to me, #1 goes down, with #2 & #3 winning, #2 & #3 move up!
 

djchad

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 8, 2001
233
0
0
Melbourne, FL
Common sense would dictate to me, #1 goes down, with #2 & #3 winning, #2 & #3 move up!

That's the logic used by most pollsters, it seems.

If OU loses, they should not become the #3 team, because that would assume that LSU and USC are better than OU.

If OU loses tonight, I still believe the pollsters will have them #1, ahead of LSU and USC. The #1 votes would be split 50% OU, 50% LSU/USC.
 

Mr Hockey

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
2,098
0
0
Well they shouldn't be ranked #1. I mean if LSU holds on, they deserve to be #1. Oklahoma is getting all this hype but they are another team who hasn't played much in my opinion. Teams in the past have been punished for losing this late in the season, why should Oklahoma be any different?
 

pt1gard

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 7, 2002
7,377
3
0
seattle
i agree mr hockey

i agree mr hockey

i respect the heck out of all three programs; not gonna talk down anyone

and I really think usc/lsu is the deserving game if what seems might happen does

lsu and usc will be 2 best teams at end of year .. too bad OU didnt come to play, and KST who had never won a big game under synder (almost never) out coached and out hustled the Sooners


gl, gregg
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
43
OU will "not" be #1 in the polls. They will prob. be #3 in the polls which will prob. be enough for them to get to the NC. If I had my choice, i would like USC to play LSU in NC. If you cannot win your conference you should not play to be #1. Then what is the point in winning and playing to win your conference?

Too bad USC could not be the team to expose OU. USC would have a field day tonight on the OU defense. I knew USC would be able to pass and move the ball on OU and people laughed at me and called me a homer. Oh yeah, some people said OU was one of the best teams ever. The 1972 USC football team was IMO.
 

Mr Hockey

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
2,098
0
0
I agree with you totally Scott. If LSU holds on then we will have two teams that won their conference outright. Why should one get penalized?
 

ctownguy

Life is Good
Forum Member
Jul 27, 2000
3,065
16
0
SoCal
mr Hockey is right especially if Oklahoma continues to get beat, hell beat they are getting whooped big time.

No way they should be playing for the title.
 

Mr Hockey

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
2,098
0
0
I agree with your comments in your first paragraph. I do think Oklahoma would have field day passing against USC's pass defense. I wasn't impressed with what I saw of that today.

I am still wondering what crack some were smoking calling Oklahoma one of the best teams ever. Jesus talk about the hype machine on overdrive!
 

ctownguy

Life is Good
Forum Member
Jul 27, 2000
3,065
16
0
SoCal
As far as winning your conference is concerned, I agree to a point, but your comparing apples to oranges as Usc does not have to play a championship game to win the pac 10.:shrug:
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
43
Why would LSU or USC want to play OU in the NC game. If they beat OU they beat a team that KSU destroyed. WUPTEE DO. USC should play LSU. It be great matchup and I hope the polls vote OU #5 in the polls and keep them out of the NC game. If OU lost by a field goal i would argue they should not play, but they are getting BLOWN OUT! What a sad team.
 

pt1gard

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 7, 2002
7,377
3
0
seattle
35-7 and get to play for trophy??

35-7 and get to play for trophy??

something is rotten in markden

if that happens

;) gregg
 

Mr Hockey

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
2,098
0
0
Scott do you think some will have a kneejerk reaction if results hold. I mean the reaction of K State beat Oklahoma & Cal & USC lost to Cal so we'll send Oklahoma.

As much as I've blasted USC' s schedule, Oklahoma's isn't that much hotter imo.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,493
256
83
Victory Lane
Scott4USC said:
and people laughed at me and called me a homer.

Oh yeah, some people said OU was one of the best teams ever. The 1972 USC football team was IMO.
...................................................................

Scott4USC

ya damn homer


KOD
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
43
That is what i been saying. I said USC could beat OU and people laughed and called me homer. I also said OU has not played anybody near as good as USC, especially USC offense. If KSU puts up 35 on OU what would the USC offense do? Remember, USC would not hold back! USC has at least 2 more weapons on offense than KSU.

The polls I hope puts OU at #5 where they belong because they cannot win their own conference. Losing this late also should be a big penalty. Your suppose to play your best football at the end of the year.

Congrats to KSU tonight. Very impressive but this OU defense is not that great.

Lets hope USC vs LSU in NC.

After all this talk, I actually think USC is better off playing LSU in NC vs OU. I think USC would have an easier time stopping the LSU offense.
 

djchad

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 8, 2001
233
0
0
Melbourne, FL
This is still an Oklahoma team that destroyed every team they played this year, except Alabama.

Which loss is worse?

A loss to a top 15 team that wins the conference championship?

A loss to a top 15 team that beat 3 top 10 teams and held your offense scoreless?

A loss to a 7-6 conference team on the road?
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
43
djchad

You cannot lose this late in the year. That is not acceptable. Your suppose to play your best ball at the end of the year. USC and LSU are playing their best football NOW! OU team should be penalized, especially getting BLOWN OUT! Embarrassing!
 

Mr Hockey

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
2,098
0
0
Other teams got penalized for losing late in the year & Oklahoma should be no different.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
Scott4USC said:
If KSU puts up 35 on OU what would the USC offense do? Remember, USC would not hold back! USC has at least 2 more weapons on offense than KSU

jesus christ scott -- it takes a lot for you to get ME pissed, since im normally willing to defend you.

but that comment above was so ridiculously stupid.

ive got kansas state and stand to win a nice chunk tonight but im not ignorant- oklahoma is still the best team in the country and theyve still got the best defense in the country

dont give me any of this "ksu scored 35, so usc would score more than that" kind of garbage.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top