that is WAYYYY too much for what it was. I think he can/will win back some it (ownership?) in court of law, if decides go that route, even though you hafta imagine there is some clause in the contract of purchasing a team that would include morality clause that NBA could come down hard on. even still, don't believe punishment fit infraction --and I hesitate to say crime, as is not criminal, in my opinion what he said, thought. not condoning his thought process - don't get me wrong - but wayyy too much for simply being taken to cleaners by scheming broad.
The guy is a POS has always been a hater. I think the message is loud and clear. He has no fight in a court room. There is an NBA constitution in which he has broken the rules of conduct many times before but Stern looked the other way. Not in 2014. I do agree that him being taped unknowingly without his consent and it being sold by that slut is another issue. Like Charles said last night....The US CONSTITUTION protects idiots with the first amendment. He has the right to think anyway he chooses but unfortunately for him his private thoughts were made public...He is finished.
well you're argument there has flaws, but I dunno that its worth splitting hairs over something as trivial as this, when really has nary a affect on the day to day lives of this sports fan.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.