NFL: 127-107 (+16.1units)
Playoffs: 7-6 (+.9units)(Looks chitty, but not bad for starting out 0-4 -24units)
Well i have read tons and tons of write-ups from all over this forum and many others, have done research till my eyes were burning. I have done number crunching, system analysis, angle analysis, and feel very comfortable with the plays i am gonna make today. Not exactly sure of the units that will be put on each game, but i will be playing:
Pitt -10
Philly +11
Phil/St L Under 49
3 teamer: Pitt, Philly +21, Philly/St L Under 59.
Being the dog player that i am, i really think your kidding yourself if you think NE has a shot in this one, and THIS IS NOT A BIASED statement by any means.
** How come no one ever mentions Pitt's number # 3 ranked offense either huh, or that NE gives up nearly 4.9 yards per rush carry on the road. only scary thing is i really cannot jusitfy any case of NE what so ever, other that LADY LUCK, which can kill ya every time.
Playoffs: 7-6 (+.9units)(Looks chitty, but not bad for starting out 0-4 -24units)
Well i have read tons and tons of write-ups from all over this forum and many others, have done research till my eyes were burning. I have done number crunching, system analysis, angle analysis, and feel very comfortable with the plays i am gonna make today. Not exactly sure of the units that will be put on each game, but i will be playing:
Pitt -10
Philly +11
Phil/St L Under 49
3 teamer: Pitt, Philly +21, Philly/St L Under 59.
Being the dog player that i am, i really think your kidding yourself if you think NE has a shot in this one, and THIS IS NOT A BIASED statement by any means.
** How come no one ever mentions Pitt's number # 3 ranked offense either huh, or that NE gives up nearly 4.9 yards per rush carry on the road. only scary thing is i really cannot jusitfy any case of NE what so ever, other that LADY LUCK, which can kill ya every time.
