Tennis betting question...your input please!

[Champion Plays]

What do you guys think is the best choice for betting tennis...

Just take best price and the risk of getting screwed on "voided if 1st set / or with "willhill" match not completed ??

Or do u sacrifice 5-10-15c to get rules " game live once a ball has been served" ??

I am undecided and haven't really thought of it greatly.. but I guess it is worth a bit more thinking and would love any feedback from you guys.

 

[kickserv]

my input:

yes.........good question indeed

Some books say one point must be played.....some say one set must be played and some say match must be completed for bet to stand.......as for me...I always look for the best odds when looking at an underdog..........in fact I don't pay much attention to the rule except when have a play on a huge huge fav

meaning......if you have say Serena Williams to win at $1.11 and she rolls her ankle in the first game you lose........


but also note when you say "getting screwed" it can also work in reverse ya know

if you have a player at say $4.00 and the guy he's playing all of a sudden cramps up in the 3rd game of the match.........you win


and remember......if bet gets voided it's no big deal.......there's nothing wrong with a push......it's better then losing that's for sure


and one other thing..........most matches (I don't have exact figures) I'd say 95% go the distance anyway