For Play 1:
- Admit, I know nothing about these players
- checked records
- checked who each has faced
- checked recent activity
Conclude - it's a worthwhile play and a bit better play than Play 2. That DOESN"T mean that Play 2 ain't worth playing cause it is.
For Play 2:
- This one is a situational thingy. That is, a player that did some overacheiving in a BIG torney vs. a dog that is playing well enough to get the upset win. Seen this kinda thing plenty of times. The fact that the FAVORITE had some tough, pressure filled matches in an overloaded schedule really helps this play. Take a shot.
1. Nakamura -220 vs. Sromova: Indonesia/4 a.m. - be there!
2. Carlsen +175 vs. Davydenko: Bejing, China/around midnight - be there too!
- Admit, I know nothing about these players
- checked records
- checked who each has faced
- checked recent activity
Conclude - it's a worthwhile play and a bit better play than Play 2. That DOESN"T mean that Play 2 ain't worth playing cause it is.
For Play 2:
- This one is a situational thingy. That is, a player that did some overacheiving in a BIG torney vs. a dog that is playing well enough to get the upset win. Seen this kinda thing plenty of times. The fact that the FAVORITE had some tough, pressure filled matches in an overloaded schedule really helps this play. Take a shot.
1. Nakamura -220 vs. Sromova: Indonesia/4 a.m. - be there!
2. Carlsen +175 vs. Davydenko: Bejing, China/around midnight - be there too!
