An old favorite of mine.As I understand it,the play is to go against and play the under.This would have hit 4 out of six on the three games this weekend if you played all three against and under.It is something to strongly consider,along with other handicapping factors,but not something to play blindly.Pre Rams and that one or two years for Minnesota it worked pretty well.The theory is that all the little things that went right offensively,seemimgly subtle things will go wrong all at once or one after the other in the fourth game.Also the mental preparedness that goes into a 30 plus point scoring effort (not just film study but getting emotionally psyched for the game) CANNOT happen every game.Its human nature and a very big part of what happened in last nights Denver/Baltimore game.(One team wanted desperately to show that they were better than their dismal record on a Monday night in front of a national audience.The other had given the #1 effort in game one vs the Rams,and again in game#2 vs the 49ers.They did just enough to beat the Bills at home last week.They're looking at the schedule and film and seeing winless,hapless Baltimore is next followed by the undefeated Chargers.Which game do you think Denver gets truely jacked up for?)In the 30-30- 30 rule the percentages catch up to the offense,things go wrong that didn't in the previous three weeks.I feel its a reflection of the lack of mental preparedness(overconfidence leading to not paying attention all week in practice and not getting sky-high for the game.)
