yeah...me elucidating on the super bowl might be comparable to kim kardashian giving her opinion on our handling of the situation in egypt for some....
but "what the hey"?.....people want to know.....and i never like disappointing my public....
:SIB
o.k....i like the squeelers here.....i`m bucking the oddsmakers and the public consensus....going against the sexy passing game....bucking my own personal intense dislike for these rat bastids....
but i have real respect for them...i see them every year...twice a year vs the ravens......stealing games with their foul magic...
.i like the squeelers` experience in this situation.....i like that front seven.....i like big ben under pressure....i prefer a multi-faceted offense vs a more one dimensional offense....i like tomlin over mccarthy....
and i don`t like the packer tendency to play dead in some games in the 2nd half...
this squeeler team is flat out hard to bury with polamalu in the starting line-up...
woodson`s good...but he`s not polamalu good....actually,no defender in the nfl is "polamalu good" in money games.....
i don`t think it will be a shock to pittsburgh and tomlin that the packers will come out in a no-huddle and try and jump out to a lead as they have been doing throughout the playoffs...it`s gonna be fun watching the packers flood the field with receivers while the squeelers bring blitzers from pretty much everywhere...
this isn`t an eagle team that stumbled into the playoffs...it`s not an "i`m just happy to be here for the first time in forever"atlanta falcons team... ....this isn`t the bears with a wooden indian at qb and very ??? offensive capabilities.......
this is a playoff hardened,experienced team that made it here in spite of playing it`s first 4 games without it`s starting qb....
this is a team that knows how to win in difficult circumstances...
so,theres weasel`s super bowl word salad for thee biggest game of the year....here helping the multitudes....potentially feeding thousands in just a little over a hundred words....
thank me very much...:0008
.
but "what the hey"?.....people want to know.....and i never like disappointing my public....
:SIB
o.k....i like the squeelers here.....i`m bucking the oddsmakers and the public consensus....going against the sexy passing game....bucking my own personal intense dislike for these rat bastids....
but i have real respect for them...i see them every year...twice a year vs the ravens......stealing games with their foul magic...
.i like the squeelers` experience in this situation.....i like that front seven.....i like big ben under pressure....i prefer a multi-faceted offense vs a more one dimensional offense....i like tomlin over mccarthy....
and i don`t like the packer tendency to play dead in some games in the 2nd half...
this squeeler team is flat out hard to bury with polamalu in the starting line-up...
woodson`s good...but he`s not polamalu good....actually,no defender in the nfl is "polamalu good" in money games.....
i don`t think it will be a shock to pittsburgh and tomlin that the packers will come out in a no-huddle and try and jump out to a lead as they have been doing throughout the playoffs...it`s gonna be fun watching the packers flood the field with receivers while the squeelers bring blitzers from pretty much everywhere...
this isn`t an eagle team that stumbled into the playoffs...it`s not an "i`m just happy to be here for the first time in forever"atlanta falcons team... ....this isn`t the bears with a wooden indian at qb and very ??? offensive capabilities.......
this is a playoff hardened,experienced team that made it here in spite of playing it`s first 4 games without it`s starting qb....
this is a team that knows how to win in difficult circumstances...
so,theres weasel`s super bowl word salad for thee biggest game of the year....here helping the multitudes....potentially feeding thousands in just a little over a hundred words....
thank me very much...:0008
.
Last edited:
