Recently there was an article in Barrons about value manager Bill Ostein. He runs a group of funds one that trades is OFALX. it is decribed as mid cap growth.
he buys stocks that everyone hates or no longer cares for (same thing), anyways the fund did 16% over ten years.
the article stated in 2005 only did 2.8% the manager says it is harder to find undervalue situations.
in the last 5 years returns have not been that great however; 5yr. avg. is 5.76% and so far in 2006 up 2.93%.
so the returns have not been stellar the last five years, and looked up and you would have done better in the index in the last 3 years.
now Bill Olstein is probably a very good manager, (the article probably will atract more investors ) however the mer is 2.17% so most of the returns have been eaten up by what the fund charges.
he also states that he believes in the future a star manager will be a (mutual / hedge ) that can on average make their investors 9-10% a year.
there is a reason that most small investors (or 12 years olds with pocket money) will be able to make better returns than OFALX and other large funds.
1. MER, and expenses. not only mers but profit sharing on the upside of 20%
2. size, I am sorry but when a fund grows over 1.8 billion you can only invest in certain companies.
know of a great jr. small cap company with market cap of $500 million or less, forget it, or not liquid enough to build a position and get out.
in most cases if you could make more than 10% on managed money, 20% is a dream for the most part you to could be "star" manager.
a simple small investor will beat 90% of all mutual fund and hedge funds.....easily.
should state there are some good funds out there but 90% maybe more are over marketed garbage......
thanks
selkirk
he buys stocks that everyone hates or no longer cares for (same thing), anyways the fund did 16% over ten years.
the article stated in 2005 only did 2.8% the manager says it is harder to find undervalue situations.
in the last 5 years returns have not been that great however; 5yr. avg. is 5.76% and so far in 2006 up 2.93%.
so the returns have not been stellar the last five years, and looked up and you would have done better in the index in the last 3 years.
now Bill Olstein is probably a very good manager, (the article probably will atract more investors ) however the mer is 2.17% so most of the returns have been eaten up by what the fund charges.
he also states that he believes in the future a star manager will be a (mutual / hedge ) that can on average make their investors 9-10% a year.
there is a reason that most small investors (or 12 years olds with pocket money) will be able to make better returns than OFALX and other large funds.
1. MER, and expenses. not only mers but profit sharing on the upside of 20%
2. size, I am sorry but when a fund grows over 1.8 billion you can only invest in certain companies.
know of a great jr. small cap company with market cap of $500 million or less, forget it, or not liquid enough to build a position and get out.
in most cases if you could make more than 10% on managed money, 20% is a dream for the most part you to could be "star" manager.
a simple small investor will beat 90% of all mutual fund and hedge funds.....easily.
should state there are some good funds out there but 90% maybe more are over marketed garbage......
thanks
selkirk