I wrote a book this afternoon and lost it so I'll just hit the high spots.
Atl -4
The Knicks were pathetic so staying close to the Knicks on that night was no big deal. They were lucky to win. Jordan has no legs. That's the reason his shots were flat and also the reason he finger-rolled two lay-ups he used to would have dunked. He might get them back but not in two days. Also his other shooters were over 50%. Don't look for that tonight.
Mem u 194'
Two reasons for this play. Det can't seem to put together 4 qts of scoring and I look for a lot of turnovers. I would not bet against Mem tonight. The league would like to see them win their first home game and Stern will be in the stands. I did well playing Det under 193 last year and I will until I see a reason not to.
Clips +4
They already cost me a win by 1 point but have to try them again here.
Phil o 179
Too many shooters on the floor for the loser not to have very close to 90. I have noticed that the 8 second rule seems to speed up the shots. Now if they can only hit them.
GS +4'
I wanted to play them last night but wouldn't pull the trigger. How bad is Phoe?
I see a lot of people playing Den tonight. I can't put my hard earned money on Van Exel having to score 27+ for me to win. And a lot of these people pick Mil to be the best in the east. Go figure. Back to GS. Folks, they could have won that game last night. Their game plan was to stop Wallace and they did. Pippen and Wells went crazy and also shot 6-6 from the three. This is not GS from last year. They are healthy and a dog at home to a team that made Den look like the Lakers in the first half. I played them as dogs at home last year and won. Why not tonight?
LAL -3'
Just toyed with Port the other night. Can cover if they want to. I feel like I'm being set up with the line this low. Most of you guys know how I feel about this play.
Good luck everyone.
Atl -4
The Knicks were pathetic so staying close to the Knicks on that night was no big deal. They were lucky to win. Jordan has no legs. That's the reason his shots were flat and also the reason he finger-rolled two lay-ups he used to would have dunked. He might get them back but not in two days. Also his other shooters were over 50%. Don't look for that tonight.
Mem u 194'
Two reasons for this play. Det can't seem to put together 4 qts of scoring and I look for a lot of turnovers. I would not bet against Mem tonight. The league would like to see them win their first home game and Stern will be in the stands. I did well playing Det under 193 last year and I will until I see a reason not to.
Clips +4
They already cost me a win by 1 point but have to try them again here.
Phil o 179
Too many shooters on the floor for the loser not to have very close to 90. I have noticed that the 8 second rule seems to speed up the shots. Now if they can only hit them.
GS +4'
I wanted to play them last night but wouldn't pull the trigger. How bad is Phoe?
I see a lot of people playing Den tonight. I can't put my hard earned money on Van Exel having to score 27+ for me to win. And a lot of these people pick Mil to be the best in the east. Go figure. Back to GS. Folks, they could have won that game last night. Their game plan was to stop Wallace and they did. Pippen and Wells went crazy and also shot 6-6 from the three. This is not GS from last year. They are healthy and a dog at home to a team that made Den look like the Lakers in the first half. I played them as dogs at home last year and won. Why not tonight?
LAL -3'
Just toyed with Port the other night. Can cover if they want to. I feel like I'm being set up with the line this low. Most of you guys know how I feel about this play.
Good luck everyone.
