Thurs play-offs

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
Well folks, I see by the lines today that the fun and games have begun. Watch yourself tonight or you will be on the wrong side of everything. Here's what I see. Both totals have dropped from last game and that makes sense because both games went under. They didn't drop enough to look stupid so if you can guess what the coaches game plans are you have a decent shot at the totals. Here is where it gets a little odd. Both these fav covered last time out and yet the line drops. That's because the public expects both dogs to make a better showing tonight and Vegas wants you to believe that they also expect both dogs to do better. Hell, let's just borrow a little money and jump all over these dogs. Why? Bos and LAL are the better teams and neither one wants to leave home 1-1. At least one of these fav will cover and the odds say both will. Taking Phil is totally out of the question for me because I don't bet a dog under 5 unless I expect them to win su. If you play Phil take the moneyline.

Let's take a closer look at this game. Iverson had a bad game last time out, but just how bad was it? He went 4 for 15 and that looks bad but if he had hit 2 more shots (4-6 points) he would have been right on his yearly ave. However, he got an extra 4 at the foul line (he ave's 8 and got 12) so that pretty well off-sets. But he usually shoots 25 not 15. Let's say he makes his ave. There's another 8. If all these things had happened in game 1, Bos still wins by 2. Now here is the rub. Both Walker and Pierce had bad shooting games (both below their season ave) and they still won by 10. I watched the game and it could have been a lot worse. Also, keep in mind that McKie, Harpring, and Motumbo all had decent to good games so don't expect much more out of them. For Phil to win, Iverson will have to score over 30 and shoot over 40% while holding Pierce and Walker to even worse shooting per centages than last time out. When Brown tried to slow the game down in the third qt is when he lost the game. I look for a controled up-temp game out of Phil which will add 10 points to their score. Right now my thinking is Bos and over.
 

DIMEDADDY

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 15, 2002
1,469
1
0
58
LAS VEGAS
NICE WRITE UP GSP!!!! MAKE A LOT OF GOOD POINTS. STILL FEEL PHILLY WILL REPRESENT TONIGHT AND MAKE A GOOD SHOWING AND WIN THE GAME OUTRIGHT, HOWEVER I WILL TAKE A LOOK AT THE OVER.
 

rrc

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
2,503
13
0
Nice write up Joe...

Nice write up Joe...

and nice call on the over in the Piston game last night. For what it's worth one of the best handicappers over at MW has been playing the same Celtic tune for the past 3 days. Celts by 6-10. Good luck.
 

vanbasten

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 21, 2001
1,567
1
0
pennsylvania
gsp,

my take on shorter numbers for the favs after covering the first game is to get the public or inexperienced bettor to bite on the fav and the shorter number. true, the more experienced bettor likes the chance of the team that's down a game to get the "must" win in the second game. am i wrong for thinking this way? i guess i'm just trying to figure out who vegas is trying to fool.

and yes i agree, boston doesn't want to leave town 1-1, but i think there is more pressure on philly to not go home down 2-0.

key tonight is iverson, no question. as he goes tonight, so goes the fate of philly. but as is typical of him, i expect a tremendous performance after his subpar performance.

regardless, only insight i'm looking for from you is to my first question (who vegas is trying to fool?)
just trying to learn more from someone who's capping i respect.
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
Van, if you noticed, I stated that one (and maybe both) fav would cover. I figure that Vegas knows the public the public will be all over Phil and LAL. The best two teams from last year. I said at the start of the season that Phil made some bad moves before the season started and I'll stick to it. Why everyone still, this late in the season, regards Phil in the same light as last year is beyond me. Even if Iverson was healthy (which he isn't), this team is not as good as last year. Bos is the better team. I feel like the lone ranger around here tonight but if I lose, it won't be the first time. If Bos and Port cover tonight Vegas gets both the pros and man on the street betters.
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
1-0 yesterday, 6-1 so far. Today going with

Bos -2
o 178
LAL o 188'

Good luck everyone

Sorry guys, I was thinking about my baseball bets when I posted.
 
Last edited:

JustWnnn

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 25, 2002
164
0
0
gsp: You said you were thinking Bos And Ov. Is this what you will
be playing? Thanks:shrug:
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
JMAC, if Bos pulls the line then I believe Port becomes a stronger play. I'm very careful about anything LAL is envolved in. Would wait until 4th qt of Bos game to make play. If Phil looks good either pass or go LA.
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
If I'm wrong, this is going to sound stupid as hell. LAL as a team has a ego as big as the world. After seeing Dal last they might try to put up 150. It might sound silly but it's part of my factor in playing the over. We'll see.

Fly, hope it works for us. By the way, did you remember to play TX over today?
 
A

Antonio

Guest
Nice Job. Even pulled a push on Da Over. Tell me how Harpring missed that damn tip in:mad:
 

TK in VA

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 21, 2000
157
0
0
Great call GSP

Great call GSP

Your write up on Phil/Boston was right on. I had already placed my wager with Wagerstreet early and tried to buy it back after I saw your thread but as many know, they had big problems with their server all day. Thanks for the continued expert insight. I've been 'tailing you for some time and appreciate your efforts.
Thanks
Tim
p.s. should have had the over in Boston as well and nice call on Laker/Port over.
 

rrc

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
2,503
13
0
Great night, AGAIN ! Thanks for all your hard work.
 

vanbasten

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 21, 2001
1,567
1
0
pennsylvania
gsp,

i think i follow. my problem was i wasn't thinking that the public would be all over philly and la( because they were the best two teams from last year). i figured with shorter numbers than the first game, the public would jump all over the favorites.

i agree, philly is a mere shadow of themselves from last year, no lynch, ratliff, etc. boston certainly has the better athletes, just thought, coaching, adjustments and need for the w, would prevail. they were fighting an uphill battle last night. from the tip, i had that feeling i was on the wrong side.

good stuff, and i appreciate the reply.

van

by the way, you're never the lone ranger, from the views you get, you have several injuns in your camp:) , including myself.
 
Last edited:

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
wtg gsp, ;)

Respect is the name of game. Your on top of the list!

This is not a slight against some very powerful handicappers on this forum. gsp and I go back a ways and we have maybe grasped a feel for each other's handicapping styles.

gsp, I need to share what I said to two friends after Madjacks Superbowl party in Las Vegas. These two friends are Madjack regulars, Gatorbait and Barfly. I told these two fine gentlemen - "No need to cap the NBA, just play whatever gsp plays."

Well, I find a need to follow no one, in other words, cap my own games. It's what I will continue to do as foolish as I am at times.

I track your records as you are to modest to tell. The way I play, I missed out on $20,000 to $30,000 profit this year in the NBA if I'd followed you.

I didn't play much this year, frustrated. A firm believer one must stay on top of this sport every day. Didn't do that this year. It cost me.

Enough about me. gsp, thanks for contributing. I read your threads everyday. May not make a play for weeks, but enjoy your expertise everyday.

Hope we can meet up someday. Your a true gentleman!

kcwolf
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
KC, I'm at a loss for words and that's almost impossible. Thanks for the kind words.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top