- Nov 19, 2007
- 281
- 0
- 0
Wake/Clemson
O 42.5
both teams need this bad, and over the years these coaches have shown they are not afraid of trick plays. i anticipate rb/wr passes, fake punts and fgs, maybe even a sneak onside kick. i see this game soaring over. haven't locked it in yet, waiting for best price, but i will be taking the over for at least 3 units.
Wake (+1)
i love how much the line has swung in this game. i have seen people say that Riley Skinner's 4 INT game vs. Navy proves he's not a good QB. those same people say Cullen Harper is really good, no matter how crappy he has been all year. "Clemson getting 2.5! but they were picked to win the ACC!" is the refrain i've heard. i'll take the team with the better (more consistent) QB, the MUCH better coach, and the home-field advantage.
*note- Wake's K Sam Swank seems to be out. i think this HELPS the Over as they will go for TDs more than FGs. also, i believe he is their punter as well, but if i am wrong, please correct me.
GL all,
Whitt
O 42.5
both teams need this bad, and over the years these coaches have shown they are not afraid of trick plays. i anticipate rb/wr passes, fake punts and fgs, maybe even a sneak onside kick. i see this game soaring over. haven't locked it in yet, waiting for best price, but i will be taking the over for at least 3 units.
Wake (+1)
i love how much the line has swung in this game. i have seen people say that Riley Skinner's 4 INT game vs. Navy proves he's not a good QB. those same people say Cullen Harper is really good, no matter how crappy he has been all year. "Clemson getting 2.5! but they were picked to win the ACC!" is the refrain i've heard. i'll take the team with the better (more consistent) QB, the MUCH better coach, and the home-field advantage.
*note- Wake's K Sam Swank seems to be out. i think this HELPS the Over as they will go for TDs more than FGs. also, i believe he is their punter as well, but if i am wrong, please correct me.
GL all,
Whitt
