Thursday Streak Plays after a small win on Wednesday

[jng]

Wednesday results:


Winning streak teams

Passed on Cleveland
Rangers won +100
Braves lost -100%
127-108 new record..... -$319



=====
Losing streak teams

Indians beat WSox, but no play on this -290 chalk
Rangers beat the Royals +100

1-0 day / 132-106 new record.... -300

OVERALL:
2-1 / 259-114 new record..... +100 day / -834 new fig
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

THURSDAY?S PLAYS

WINNING STREAK TEAMS

Yankees W3 -200 PASS FOR ME
Indians W4 Off
Oakland W4 -140
Rangers W5 Off
Reds W3 +136 with Harvey

LOSING STREAK TEAMS (Play against them)

White Sox L7 Play is on Oak -140
Royals L9 off
Mariners L3 Play would be on Yankees but -200 plays have hurt and I pass
Padres L4 Play on Giants -140 with Bumgarner


Reiterating, maybe, just maybe, big road chalk play on RL or -2.5 is OK.
But I'd like the system response to 200 or higher to be pass. OK?



No, I have not yet looked hard enough to see the historical incidence of W4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 games. That data good really guide this system to great success. As it is, LOB, we only one small tweak about big favs and a strong suggestion from Jack that only fools play the home team on the RL to win by 1' or 2'. As he said,you get eight innings instead of nine to establish that 1+ lead. Thanks MadJack. With that tweak we'd be ahead and will stay ahead. I hope.

?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????

 

[LordofBalls]

maybe next week after things settle down some for me, I will begin to go back to April 12th and actually track how the "Big Faves" have done in THIS system so far this yr....

Jay,
1st ~ Bet them yourself however you want to bet them...

But ALL the data up to the last 2 days has been tracked at risking $100/gm on the dogs and To Win $100 on the faves... be they big or small.


So,
If/when you STOP tracking the records of part of the group (big faves) at this unit wager, the data BECOMES 2 DIFFERENT ANIMALS.... your tracking becomes flawed.
basically you're starting a "new" system... can't just change it and keep the same records cuz its different.... unless I'm not understanding what you say you're doing.
Whatever....
but if u can keep the "records" going as I had it, with ALL applicable system results recorded... that would be BEST.


How About This ~

AFTER I get back we can keep Track of the "BIG Faves" IN ADDITION TO the "Regular System Tracking"?

Just add another category....

Winning Streak Teams Record is Blah-Blah...
Losing Streak Teams Record is Blah-Blah...
Overall record is blah blah... + $567 ytd

AND

Big Faves @ Home Record vs ml.... vs runline...
Big Faves Road Record vs ml.... vs runline...

OK??

like I said, maybe next week I can start to go back and research it for since we began on April 12th...

BUT -
PLEASE DON'T START ALTERING THE WAY YOU ARE KEEPING THE "System Records"... because if you leave out the Big Fave Results, then you'd be changing the system! ok?

Which then at the end of the season it'd be like...
Well we tracked the "Streak System" for 9 wks and got (these results)...
then
we started tracking the streak system without the Big Faves in the results for 10 wks and got (whatever results)..
See? It's 2 diff "systems"... apples and oranges.

It's BETTER to say:

*We tracked the Streak System for 20 wks and got this (result)...

AND

WITHIN the System, we also tracked Home/Away Favorites of -200 or higher against the moneyline and the runlines and we got this (result)...

ya follow what I mean Jay?

okay this was a nice 30 min distraction for me, but I have to get some rest...

I'll ck back tomorrow (maybe, if I can) ...

ALL it takes is time and effort and we can catch it up with separate info on the big faves.. but can't do it til I get thru this...

g'nite and good luck