ytd: 12-9
Way too many games posted by me last week-cutting down this week.
Zoomers ov 54--gl
Hawkeye, if I may ask, who are you referring to when you say zoomers. Very sorry for asking to you clarify but I sometimes can't parallel the names the actual team. If time doesn't permit for you to answer. It's ok
Thanks and gl on your plays
Zoomers are the fly boys from Air Force if I'm not mistaken, but Hawkeye will be along soon to verify. :toast:
Grabbed a big handful of Moo U/Zips over 62.5 this morning. Figured it would have opened much higher.
If Iowa had no answer for Lazard and Co, why would a lowly MAC team have one?
And the clowns will give up a few points of their own. 42-24 final in this tilt gives us over players a nice win...[emoji41]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bc still looking at that game
Reds--I think you are right on there--3 Putt says ISU will have more fans there and they need a win to have any kind of chance for a bowl-ISU's def is not good. Just wonder if they will lay off some as I think B12 stuff starts next week--gl
Probably neither-people still see Mich having a great def-I don't. So my play is now 47--gl
Did your book give you a new line since it dropped? Most of us took this when you posted it at Over 54.:toast:
Same thing with your week 1 conditional play on the 2nd half Over: Oh St ov 27 2nd h looks good if Ind keeps throwing it every play--wear down time?
You had changed the phrasing of your play since you posted it but I cannot find a book that allows me to make conditional bets based on a factor.:mj07:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.