Trends
- Thread starter StevieD
- Start date
Each game is a new game, trends are blowen up bs to justify ones picks, hell i can find a trend to fit anything now a teams tendencies are different and good to look at stat wise for that year.but they also change due to coaches and players for a given team.
There is value in line trends. For example, Colts are 7-0-1 ATS this year when -6 or lower or getting points. Last year they were 7-4-1 ATS in this situation in the regular season. The year before, 3-1 ATS. The year before, 6-2 ATS. Obvious value on the Colts when they are not giving a boatload of points.
Another trend was that Wyoming had been outscored 170-30 in five games this season against winning teams. Now, that one didn't carry in their bowl game as they won SU against Fresno. It was still valuable information and if it meshed with other things in support of Fresno then you have something to work with. If it was just one of 20 points in Fresno's favor while Wyoming had 20 things going their way, well, then it's just noise.
Some people might call these trends, I call them information. And when more information piles up to support one side than the other, then go with that side.
A trend is not something along the lines of the Cincinnati Reds are 8-13 on Tuesdays. That's a coincidence. Next Tuesday's performance will not hinge upon the previous Tuesdays.
A trend is not something like the Raiders have defeated the Vikings five straight times dating back to 1983. That has nothing to do with the current editions.
Last night on MNF they said something like Jason Campbell has started 50 of the last 53 Redskins games. I would think it is very valid to look at the lines of all of Jason Campbell's starts and see if there is any value in certain situations. Are the Redskins 2-8 ATS when favored by double digits with Campbell, meaning he is overvalued? Are they 5-14 ATS in games of +/-3, which are basically even games, meaning he doesn't help his team rise to the occasion? Are they 7-2 ATS when double-digit dogs, which means he doesn't stink as bad as some think? Those would be valueable trends to find.
But pick the opposite of what happened in Sunday Night Football is not a trend. It's guessing.
Another trend was that Wyoming had been outscored 170-30 in five games this season against winning teams. Now, that one didn't carry in their bowl game as they won SU against Fresno. It was still valuable information and if it meshed with other things in support of Fresno then you have something to work with. If it was just one of 20 points in Fresno's favor while Wyoming had 20 things going their way, well, then it's just noise.
Some people might call these trends, I call them information. And when more information piles up to support one side than the other, then go with that side.
A trend is not something along the lines of the Cincinnati Reds are 8-13 on Tuesdays. That's a coincidence. Next Tuesday's performance will not hinge upon the previous Tuesdays.
A trend is not something like the Raiders have defeated the Vikings five straight times dating back to 1983. That has nothing to do with the current editions.
Last night on MNF they said something like Jason Campbell has started 50 of the last 53 Redskins games. I would think it is very valid to look at the lines of all of Jason Campbell's starts and see if there is any value in certain situations. Are the Redskins 2-8 ATS when favored by double digits with Campbell, meaning he is overvalued? Are they 5-14 ATS in games of +/-3, which are basically even games, meaning he doesn't help his team rise to the occasion? Are they 7-2 ATS when double-digit dogs, which means he doesn't stink as bad as some think? Those would be valueable trends to find.
But pick the opposite of what happened in Sunday Night Football is not a trend. It's guessing.
They will list 10-20 trends for a team and then list 10-20 trends again that team and do the same thing with the team they are playing.
What trends do we pick? The ones that we think are better? :shrug:
I know Al uses them and he's very successful, so I guess I can't argue against them, that for should :shrug:
I guess I just don't know how to use them.
What trends do we pick? The ones that we think are better? :shrug:
I know Al uses them and he's very successful, so I guess I can't argue against them, that for should :shrug:
I guess I just don't know how to use them.
i use trends as a suppliment to other capping stuff i do....& as far as being successful, i guess you haven't been reading my bowl thread jack....right now i couldn't pick the winner even if i knew what the score would be....it's the worst streak that i have had in some time....
Jack and Fletcher hit it right on the head. If you use the very reputable and excellent data provided by Statfox (well worth the price IMO), you will be exposed to every trend imaginable. I like Statfox but not for trends. If you like trends, munch on this for awhile. Here are some (LOL) trends for tonights NBA game between Portland and San Antonio. You might want to give your self some time to sort through these trends and pick the ones you like :mj07: Unfortunatley I cannot put the entire post in one post because it is 58, 130 characters long and it will only take 40,000. So more in the next post.
STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS?
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring PORTLAND to cover the spread
There are 3 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.
PORTLAND is 30-18 ATS (+10.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.0, OPPONENT 94.7 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 206-157 ATS (+33.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 92.9, OPPONENT 94.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 17-30 ATS (-16.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.6, OPPONENT 94.4 - (Rating = 1*)
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the spread
There are 1 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.
SAN ANTONIO is 92-53 ATS (+33.7 Units) in home games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 70%) since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.1, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*)
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the total
There are 12 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.
PORTLAND is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) in road games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 70%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 90.9, OPPONENT 97.4 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 47-30 UNDER (+14.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 94.5, OPPONENT 95.9 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 107-77 UNDER (+22.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 92.1, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 53-35 UNDER (+14.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 97.8, OPPONENT 97.7 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 104-75 UNDER (+21.5 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 90.7, OPPONENT 95.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 358-285 UNDER (+44.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 93.0, OPPONENT 90.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 127-91 UNDER (+26.9 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 93.5, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 86-60 UNDER (+20.0 Units) in home games versus poor passing teams, averaging <=20 assists/game since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.5, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 72-48 UNDER (+19.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.8, OPPONENT 93.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 75-48 UNDER (+22.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.6, OPPONENT 92.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 158-123 UNDER (+22.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.5, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 57-36 UNDER (+17.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 93.4, OPPONENT 93.8 - (Rating = 1*)
STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS?
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring PORTLAND to cover the spread
There are 13 trends with a total rating of 7 stars.
PORTLAND is 26-15 ATS (+9.5 Units) when the total is between 180 and 189.5 points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.2, OPPONENT 92.5 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 13-4 ATS (+8.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is between 185 and 189.5 points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.0, OPPONENT 92.6 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 35-19 ATS (+14.1 Units) in road games when playing their 5th game in 7 days since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 92.2, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 73-44 ATS (+24.6 Units) when playing their 2nd road game in 2 days since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 93.0, OPPONENT 93.4 - (Rating = 1*)
PORTLAND is 16-2 ATS (+13.8 Units) when playing their 4rd road game in 5 days since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 92.8, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 3*)
PORTLAND is 44-28 ATS (+13.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 98.1, OPPONENT 94.2 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 36-18 ATS (+16.2 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 98.9, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 1*)
PORTLAND is 46-30 ATS (+13.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 97.5, OPPONENT 93.2 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 28-15 ATS (+11.5 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 100.9, OPPONENT 93.2 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 37-22 ATS (+12.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 97.1, OPPONENT 93.6 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 38-23 ATS (+12.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 97.3, OPPONENT 93.5 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 4-15 ATS (-12.5 Units) revenging a road loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.6, OPPONENT 99.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 7-18 ATS (-12.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.7, OPPONENT 96.0 - (Rating = 1*)
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the spread
There are 8 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.
PORTLAND is 14-32 ATS (-21.2 Units) in road games after 5 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 89.8, OPPONENT 97.4 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 303-250 ATS (+28.0 Units) as a favorite of 3.5 to 9.5 points since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.9, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 171-128 ATS (+30.2 Units) as a home favorite of 6.5 to 12 points since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.3, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 98-69 ATS (+22.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.9, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 251-191 ATS (+40.9 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.8, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 115-83 ATS (+23.7 Units) in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 255-203 ATS (+31.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.8, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 79-48 ATS (+26.2 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*)
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the total
There are 2 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.
PORTLAND is 20-7 OVER (+12.3 Units) after allowing 85 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 102.6, OPPONENT 97.2 - (Rating = 2*)
SAN ANTONIO is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 95.7 - (Rating = 0*)
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the total
There are 25 trends with a total rating of 9 stars.
PORTLAND is 112-87 UNDER (+16.3 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.9, OPPONENT 94.7 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 63-39 UNDER (+20.1 Units) against Southwest division opponents since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 89.4, OPPONENT 94.2 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 94.2, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*)
PORTLAND is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) in road games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 93.3, OPPONENT 91.3 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 25-11 UNDER (+12.9 Units) in road games after 3 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 91.6, OPPONENT 95.3 - (Rating = 1*)
PORTLAND is 36-18 UNDER (+16.2 Units) after 4 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.8, OPPONENT 94.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 116-93 UNDER (+13.7 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.6, OPPONENT 92.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 309-244 UNDER (+40.6 Units) as a home favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.0, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 174-128 UNDER (+33.2 Units) as a home favorite of 6.5 to 12 points since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.3, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 322-262 UNDER (+33.8 Units) in home games since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.7, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 114-84 UNDER (+21.6 Units) in home games first half of the season since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.9, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 69-45 UNDER (+19.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.3, OPPONENT 92.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 45-22 UNDER (+20.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.6, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 2*)
SAN ANTONIO is 30-13 UNDER (+15.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.1, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 44-27 UNDER (+14.3 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 117-78 UNDER (+31.2 Units) in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 497-414 UNDER (+41.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.2, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 408-344 UNDER (+29.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.3, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 300-247 UNDER (+28.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.9, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 319-267 UNDER (+25.3 Units) after playing a home game since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.7, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 337-272 UNDER (+37.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.8, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 417-353 UNDER (+28.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.1, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 58-37 UNDER (+17.3 Units) after a game committing 8 or less turnovers since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.5, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 181-136 UNDER (+31.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.0, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 110-81 UNDER (+20.9 Units) after a game where they made 50% of their 3 point shots or better since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.4, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS?
StatFox Super Situations favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the spread
There are 25 situations with a total rating of 52 stars.
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(57-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (67-17 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 6.2
The average score in these games was: Team 102.3, Opponent 92.6 (Average point differential = +9.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 34 (41.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (40-18).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (112-96).
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(58-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (66-20 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101, Opponent 91.6 (Average point differential = +9.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 39 (46.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (42-17).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (130-90).
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(100-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (125-32 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.7
The average score in these games was: Team 101.6, Opponent 93.4 (Average point differential = +8.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 56 (36.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (65-35).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (208-157).
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(92-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (116-26 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101.8, Opponent 93.1 (Average point differential = +8.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 52 (37.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (61-30).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (188-142).
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(132-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +44 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (166-49 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.9
The average score in these games was: Team 101.7, Opponent 93.4 (Average point differential = +8.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 82 (38.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (96-58).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (287-248).
Play Against - Any team (PORTLAND) - average shooting team (43.5-45.5%) against an average defensive team (43.5-45.5%), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +5.5 reb/game).
(25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (23-7 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 2.1
The average score in these games was: Team 99.1, Opponent 91 (Average point differential = +8.1)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 12 (41.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (14-3).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (44-23).
Play Against - Underdogs (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(151-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (183-73 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.3
The average score in these games was: Team 101.9, Opponent 95.4 (Average point differential = +6.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 85 (33.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-9).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (100-69).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (358-316).
Play Against - Underdogs (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(125-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (151-54 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.6
The average score in these games was: Team 102.4, Opponent 95.2 (Average point differential = +7.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 73 (36.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (88-55).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (288-245).
Play Against - Road underdogs (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(116-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (141-49 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 102.1, Opponent 94.9 (Average point differential = +7.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 70 (37.8% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (81-52).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (265-222).
Play Against - Road underdogs (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(128-79 since 1996.) (61.8%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (166-46)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.4
The average score in these games was: Team 98.7, Opponent 91.7 (Average point differential = +7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 64 (30.6% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (36-21).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (55-31).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(58-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (70-17 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 6.3
The average score in these games was: Team 102.4, Opponent 92.7 (Average point differential = +9.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 35 (41.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (41-20).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (109-95).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(58-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (66-17 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101.1, Opponent 91.2 (Average point differential = +9.9)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 39 (48.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (42-15).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (124-85).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(114-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (142-40 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101.1, Opponent 92.7 (Average point differential = +8.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 66 (36.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (90-47).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (234-220).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(94-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (116-31 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101.9, Opponent 93.6 (Average point differential = +8.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 54 (37.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (62-33).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (195-147).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(87-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (108-25 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.9
The average score in these games was: Team 102, Opponent 93.2 (Average point differential = +8.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 50 (38.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (58-28).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (176-133).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(55-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (68-13 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.7
The average score in these games was: Team 102.5, Opponent 92.6 (Average point differential = +10)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 37 (46.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (38-15).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (111-82).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(44-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +22 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (53-12 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 6
The average score in these games was: Team 100.9, Opponent 91.9 (Average point differential = +9)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 24 (38.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (28-12).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (90-55).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(131-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (165-43 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.9
The average score in these games was: Team 101.9, Opponent 93.2 (Average point differential = +8.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 81 (39.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (95-54).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (280-238).
Play Against - Road teams (PORTLAND) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(132-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (153-57 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 4.5
The average score in these games was: Team 100.1, Opponent 92.3 (Average point differential = +7.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 82 (40.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (97-55).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (311-254).
Play Against - Road teams (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(155-97 since 1996.) (61.5%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (190-68)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 3.7
The average score in these games was: Team 97.9, Opponent 92.3 (Average point differential = +5.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 85 (33.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (8-9).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (47-26).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (68-38).
Play On - Home favorites (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(128-81 since 1996.) (61.2%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (166-48)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.3
The average score in these games was: Team 98.7, Opponent 91.7 (Average point differential = +7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 64 (30.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (37-22).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (55-33).
Play On - Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(182-119 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (232-74 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.9
The average score in these games was: Team 101.2, Opponent 93.3 (Average point differential = +8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 107 (35.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (131-86).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (412-365).
Play On - Home teams (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(87-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (107-30 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5
The average score in these games was: Team 103.3, Opponent 95.1 (Average point differential = +8.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 50 (37% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (61-40).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (213-164).
Play On - Home teams (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(261-183 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (314-138 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 4.4
The average score in these games was: Team 100.1, Opponent 93.9 (Average point differential = +6.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 153 (34.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (8-9).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (188-132).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (645-559).
Play On - Home teams (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(151-98 since 1996.) (60.6%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (186-69)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 3.8
The average score in these games was: Team 97.9, Opponent 92.5 (Average point differential = +5.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 82 (32.8% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (8-9).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (47-26).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (67-39).
StatFox Super Situations favoring PORTLAND to cover the spread
There are 4 situations with a total rating of 7 stars.
Play On - Underdogs (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in December games.
(180-117 since 1996.) (60.6%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (109-200)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.3
The average score in these games was: Team 93.2, Opponent 97.2 (Average point differential = -4)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 114 (37.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (10-13).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (70-36).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (94-55).
Play On - Road underdogs (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in December games.
(100-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +29.6 units. Rating = 1*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (51-118 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.8
The average score in these games was: Team 94.8, Opponent 98.7 (Average point differential = -3.9)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 60 (35.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (8-15).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (70-48).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (201-145).
STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS?
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring PORTLAND to cover the spread
There are 3 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.
PORTLAND is 30-18 ATS (+10.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.0, OPPONENT 94.7 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 206-157 ATS (+33.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 92.9, OPPONENT 94.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 17-30 ATS (-16.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.6, OPPONENT 94.4 - (Rating = 1*)
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the spread
There are 1 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.
SAN ANTONIO is 92-53 ATS (+33.7 Units) in home games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 70%) since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.1, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*)
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the total
There are 12 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.
PORTLAND is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) in road games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 70%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 90.9, OPPONENT 97.4 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 47-30 UNDER (+14.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 94.5, OPPONENT 95.9 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 107-77 UNDER (+22.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 92.1, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 53-35 UNDER (+14.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 97.8, OPPONENT 97.7 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 104-75 UNDER (+21.5 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 90.7, OPPONENT 95.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 358-285 UNDER (+44.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 93.0, OPPONENT 90.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 127-91 UNDER (+26.9 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 93.5, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 86-60 UNDER (+20.0 Units) in home games versus poor passing teams, averaging <=20 assists/game since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.5, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 72-48 UNDER (+19.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.8, OPPONENT 93.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 75-48 UNDER (+22.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.6, OPPONENT 92.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 158-123 UNDER (+22.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.5, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 57-36 UNDER (+17.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 93.4, OPPONENT 93.8 - (Rating = 1*)
STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS?
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring PORTLAND to cover the spread
There are 13 trends with a total rating of 7 stars.
PORTLAND is 26-15 ATS (+9.5 Units) when the total is between 180 and 189.5 points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.2, OPPONENT 92.5 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 13-4 ATS (+8.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is between 185 and 189.5 points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.0, OPPONENT 92.6 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 35-19 ATS (+14.1 Units) in road games when playing their 5th game in 7 days since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 92.2, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 73-44 ATS (+24.6 Units) when playing their 2nd road game in 2 days since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 93.0, OPPONENT 93.4 - (Rating = 1*)
PORTLAND is 16-2 ATS (+13.8 Units) when playing their 4rd road game in 5 days since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 92.8, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 3*)
PORTLAND is 44-28 ATS (+13.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 98.1, OPPONENT 94.2 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 36-18 ATS (+16.2 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 98.9, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 1*)
PORTLAND is 46-30 ATS (+13.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 97.5, OPPONENT 93.2 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 28-15 ATS (+11.5 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 100.9, OPPONENT 93.2 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 37-22 ATS (+12.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 97.1, OPPONENT 93.6 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 38-23 ATS (+12.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 97.3, OPPONENT 93.5 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 4-15 ATS (-12.5 Units) revenging a road loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.6, OPPONENT 99.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 7-18 ATS (-12.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.7, OPPONENT 96.0 - (Rating = 1*)
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the spread
There are 8 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.
PORTLAND is 14-32 ATS (-21.2 Units) in road games after 5 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 89.8, OPPONENT 97.4 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 303-250 ATS (+28.0 Units) as a favorite of 3.5 to 9.5 points since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.9, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 171-128 ATS (+30.2 Units) as a home favorite of 6.5 to 12 points since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.3, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 98-69 ATS (+22.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.9, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 251-191 ATS (+40.9 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.8, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 115-83 ATS (+23.7 Units) in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 255-203 ATS (+31.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.8, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 79-48 ATS (+26.2 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*)
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the total
There are 2 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.
PORTLAND is 20-7 OVER (+12.3 Units) after allowing 85 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 102.6, OPPONENT 97.2 - (Rating = 2*)
SAN ANTONIO is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) revenging a same season loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 95.7 - (Rating = 0*)
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the total
There are 25 trends with a total rating of 9 stars.
PORTLAND is 112-87 UNDER (+16.3 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.9, OPPONENT 94.7 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 63-39 UNDER (+20.1 Units) against Southwest division opponents since 1996.
The average score was PORTLAND 89.4, OPPONENT 94.2 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 94.2, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*)
PORTLAND is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) in road games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 93.3, OPPONENT 91.3 - (Rating = 0*)
PORTLAND is 25-11 UNDER (+12.9 Units) in road games after 3 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 91.6, OPPONENT 95.3 - (Rating = 1*)
PORTLAND is 36-18 UNDER (+16.2 Units) after 4 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PORTLAND 96.8, OPPONENT 94.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 116-93 UNDER (+13.7 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.6, OPPONENT 92.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 309-244 UNDER (+40.6 Units) as a home favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.0, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 174-128 UNDER (+33.2 Units) as a home favorite of 6.5 to 12 points since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.3, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 322-262 UNDER (+33.8 Units) in home games since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.7, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 114-84 UNDER (+21.6 Units) in home games first half of the season since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 97.9, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 69-45 UNDER (+19.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.3, OPPONENT 92.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 45-22 UNDER (+20.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.6, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 2*)
SAN ANTONIO is 30-13 UNDER (+15.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.1, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 44-27 UNDER (+14.3 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 117-78 UNDER (+31.2 Units) in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 96.5, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SAN ANTONIO is 497-414 UNDER (+41.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.2, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 408-344 UNDER (+29.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.3, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 300-247 UNDER (+28.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.9, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 319-267 UNDER (+25.3 Units) after playing a home game since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.7, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 337-272 UNDER (+37.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.8, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 417-353 UNDER (+28.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.1, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 58-37 UNDER (+17.3 Units) after a game committing 8 or less turnovers since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.5, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 181-136 UNDER (+31.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 95.0, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SAN ANTONIO is 110-81 UNDER (+20.9 Units) after a game where they made 50% of their 3 point shots or better since 1996.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 94.4, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS?
StatFox Super Situations favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the spread
There are 25 situations with a total rating of 52 stars.
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(57-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (67-17 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 6.2
The average score in these games was: Team 102.3, Opponent 92.6 (Average point differential = +9.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 34 (41.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (40-18).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (112-96).
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(58-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (66-20 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101, Opponent 91.6 (Average point differential = +9.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 39 (46.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (42-17).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (130-90).
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(100-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (125-32 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.7
The average score in these games was: Team 101.6, Opponent 93.4 (Average point differential = +8.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 56 (36.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (65-35).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (208-157).
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(92-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (116-26 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101.8, Opponent 93.1 (Average point differential = +8.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 52 (37.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (61-30).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (188-142).
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(132-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +44 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (166-49 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.9
The average score in these games was: Team 101.7, Opponent 93.4 (Average point differential = +8.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 82 (38.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (96-58).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (287-248).
Play Against - Any team (PORTLAND) - average shooting team (43.5-45.5%) against an average defensive team (43.5-45.5%), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +5.5 reb/game).
(25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (23-7 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 2.1
The average score in these games was: Team 99.1, Opponent 91 (Average point differential = +8.1)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 12 (41.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (14-3).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (44-23).
Play Against - Underdogs (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(151-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (183-73 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.3
The average score in these games was: Team 101.9, Opponent 95.4 (Average point differential = +6.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 85 (33.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-9).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (100-69).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (358-316).
Play Against - Underdogs (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(125-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (151-54 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.6
The average score in these games was: Team 102.4, Opponent 95.2 (Average point differential = +7.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 73 (36.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (88-55).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (288-245).
Play Against - Road underdogs (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(116-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (141-49 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 102.1, Opponent 94.9 (Average point differential = +7.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 70 (37.8% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (81-52).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (265-222).
Play Against - Road underdogs (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(128-79 since 1996.) (61.8%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (166-46)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.4
The average score in these games was: Team 98.7, Opponent 91.7 (Average point differential = +7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 64 (30.6% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (36-21).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (55-31).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - playing on back-to-back days, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(58-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (70-17 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 6.3
The average score in these games was: Team 102.4, Opponent 92.7 (Average point differential = +9.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 35 (41.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (41-20).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (109-95).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(58-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (66-17 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101.1, Opponent 91.2 (Average point differential = +9.9)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 39 (48.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (42-15).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (124-85).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(114-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (142-40 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101.1, Opponent 92.7 (Average point differential = +8.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 66 (36.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (90-47).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (234-220).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(94-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (116-31 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.8
The average score in these games was: Team 101.9, Opponent 93.6 (Average point differential = +8.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 54 (37.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (62-33).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (195-147).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(87-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (108-25 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.9
The average score in these games was: Team 102, Opponent 93.2 (Average point differential = +8.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 50 (38.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (58-28).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (176-133).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(55-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (68-13 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.7
The average score in these games was: Team 102.5, Opponent 92.6 (Average point differential = +10)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 37 (46.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (38-15).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (111-82).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(44-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +22 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (53-12 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 6
The average score in these games was: Team 100.9, Opponent 91.9 (Average point differential = +9)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 24 (38.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (28-12).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (90-55).
Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(131-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (165-43 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.9
The average score in these games was: Team 101.9, Opponent 93.2 (Average point differential = +8.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 81 (39.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (95-54).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (280-238).
Play Against - Road teams (PORTLAND) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(132-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (153-57 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 4.5
The average score in these games was: Team 100.1, Opponent 92.3 (Average point differential = +7.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 82 (40.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (97-55).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (311-254).
Play Against - Road teams (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(155-97 since 1996.) (61.5%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (190-68)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 3.7
The average score in these games was: Team 97.9, Opponent 92.3 (Average point differential = +5.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 85 (33.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (8-9).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (47-26).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (68-38).
Play On - Home favorites (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(128-81 since 1996.) (61.2%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (166-48)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.3
The average score in these games was: Team 98.7, Opponent 91.7 (Average point differential = +7)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 64 (30.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (37-22).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (55-33).
Play On - Home favorites of 3.5 to 9.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(182-119 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (232-74 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5.9
The average score in these games was: Team 101.2, Opponent 93.3 (Average point differential = +8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 107 (35.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (131-86).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (412-365).
Play On - Home teams (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(87-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (107-30 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 5
The average score in these games was: Team 103.3, Opponent 95.1 (Average point differential = +8.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 50 (37% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (61-40).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (213-164).
Play On - Home teams (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(261-183 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (314-138 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 4.4
The average score in these games was: Team 100.1, Opponent 93.9 (Average point differential = +6.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 153 (34.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (8-9).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (188-132).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (645-559).
Play On - Home teams (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(151-98 since 1996.) (60.6%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (186-69)
The average line posted in these games was: Team favored by 3.8
The average score in these games was: Team 97.9, Opponent 92.5 (Average point differential = +5.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 82 (32.8% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (8-9).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (47-26).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (67-39).
StatFox Super Situations favoring PORTLAND to cover the spread
There are 4 situations with a total rating of 7 stars.
Play On - Underdogs (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in December games.
(180-117 since 1996.) (60.6%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (109-200)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.3
The average score in these games was: Team 93.2, Opponent 97.2 (Average point differential = -4)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 114 (37.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (10-13).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (70-36).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (94-55).
Play On - Road underdogs (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in December games.
(100-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +29.6 units. Rating = 1*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (51-118 over the last 5 seasons.)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.8
The average score in these games was: Team 94.8, Opponent 98.7 (Average point differential = -3.9)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 60 (35.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (8-15).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (70-48).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (201-145).
Same game - more trends and situations
Play On - Road underdogs (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in December games.
(129-78 since 1996.) (62.3%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (71-146)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.9
The average score in these games was: Team 92.9, Opponent 97.2 (Average point differential = -4.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 79 (36.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (6-7).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (52-23).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (67-34).
Play On - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in December games.
(91-53 since 1996.) (63.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (53-98)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.4
The average score in these games was: Team 93, Opponent 96.7 (Average point differential = -3.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 57 (38% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (36-15).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (46-24).
StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the total
There are 34 situations with a total rating of 67 stars.
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - good free throw shooting team (76-79%) against an average free throw shooting team (72-76%), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +5.5 reb/game).
(50-19 since 1996.) (72.5%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*)
The average total posted in these games was: 188.9
The average score in these games was: Team 89.5, Opponent 92.9 (Total points scored = 182.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 36 (52.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (8-5).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (14-8).
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(106-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192.5
The average score in these games was: Team 96.1, Opponent 94.4 (Total points scored = 190.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 76 (44.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (39-35).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (213-162).
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(83-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192
The average score in these games was: Team 95.6, Opponent 93.6 (Total points scored = 189.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 61 (47.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (30-23).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (162-119).
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(321-227 since 1996.) (58.6%, +71.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 189.3
The average score in these games was: Team 93.3, Opponent 93.2 (Total points scored = 186.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 243 (44.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (94-76).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (138-98).
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(72-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.7%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192.9
The average score in these games was: Team 96, Opponent 94.6 (Total points scored = 190.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 53 (46.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (24-26).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (132-100).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - extremely tired team - when playing their 3rd game in 4 days, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(63-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 184.8
The average score in these games was: Team 89.9, Opponent 90.7 (Total points scored = 180.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 45 (47.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (47-26).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (190-156).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - average 3PT shooting team (33-36.5%) against an average 3PT defense (33-36.5%), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +5.5 reb/game).
(63-29 since 1996.) (68.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 91, Opponent 89.8 (Total points scored = 180.9)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 39 (42.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (14-6).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (19-12).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(567-427 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +97.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 92.1, Opponent 92.2 (Total points scored = 184.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 400 (40.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (6-14).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (340-247).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (1560-1347).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in December games.
(88-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.5
The average score in these games was: Team 90.6, Opponent 90.6 (Total points scored = 181.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 70 (50% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (58-32).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (234-206).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in December games.
(90-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.7
The average score in these games was: Team 93.5, Opponent 90.1 (Total points scored = 183.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 67 (46.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-7).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (56-37).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (230-215).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in December games.
(49-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.4
The average score in these games was: Team 89.8, Opponent 88.9 (Total points scored = 178.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 39 (57.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (32-14).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (130-97).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, first half of the season.
(210-143 since 1996.) (59.5%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.3
The average score in these games was: Team 92, Opponent 91.6 (Total points scored = 183.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 147 (41.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (50-24).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (73-38).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), in December games.
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 88, Opponent 88 (Total points scored = 176)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 20 (62.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (12-8).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (70-54).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(120-75 since 1996.) (61.5%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 90.9, Opponent 91 (Total points scored = 182)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 92 (47.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (24-10).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (38-14).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(167-110 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +46 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 91.9, Opponent 91 (Total points scored = 182.9)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 123 (44.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (98-65).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (366-280).
Play Under - Road teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in December games.
(24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185
The average score in these games was: Team 86.6, Opponent 89.9 (Total points scored = 176.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 21 (65.6% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (16-5).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (70-45).
Play Under - Road teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, first half of the season.
(39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 89, Opponent 91.6 (Total points scored = 180.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 32 (55.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (26-12).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (111-73).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(106-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192.5
The average score in these games was: Team 96.1, Opponent 94.4 (Total points scored = 190.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 76 (44.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (39-35).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (213-162).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(83-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192
The average score in these games was: Team 95.6, Opponent 93.6 (Total points scored = 189.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 61 (47.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (30-23).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (162-119).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(321-227 since 1996.) (58.6%, +71.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 189.3
The average score in these games was: Team 93.3, Opponent 93.2 (Total points scored = 186.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 243 (44.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (94-76).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (138-98).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(60-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192.8
The average score in these games was: Team 96.4, Opponent 93.6 (Total points scored = 190)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 43 (47.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (23-16).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (113-81).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(416-304 since 1996.) (57.8%, +81.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 189
The average score in these games was: Team 93.8, Opponent 93 (Total points scored = 186.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 319 (44.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (9-12).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (117-91).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (170-130).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(250-168 since 1996.) (59.8%, +65.2 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 189.1
The average score in these games was: Team 93.2, Opponent 93.2 (Total points scored = 186.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 185 (44.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-7).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (74-60).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (105-75).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=36.5%) against an average 3PT shooting team (33-36.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(147-94 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.3
The average score in these games was: Team 93, Opponent 89.6 (Total points scored = 182.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 103 (43.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (89-59).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (222-163).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(567-427 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +97.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 92.1, Opponent 92.2 (Total points scored = 184.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 400 (40.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (6-14).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (340-247).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (1560-1347).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in December games.
(88-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.5
The average score in these games was: Team 90.6, Opponent 90.6 (Total points scored = 181.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 70 (50% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (58-32).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (234-206).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in December games.
(90-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.7
The average score in these games was: Team 93.5, Opponent 90.1 (Total points scored = 183.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 67 (46.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-7).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (56-37).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (230-215).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in December games.
(49-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.4
The average score in these games was: Team 89.8, Opponent 88.9 (Total points scored = 178.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 39 (57.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (32-14).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (130-97).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, first half of the season.
(210-143 since 1996.) (59.5%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.3
The average score in these games was: Team 92, Opponent 91.6 (Total points scored = 183.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 147 (41.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (50-24).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (73-38).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), in December games.
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 88, Opponent 88 (Total points scored = 176)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 20 (62.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (12-8).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (70-54).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(120-75 since 1996.) (61.5%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 90.9, Opponent 91 (Total points scored = 182)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 92 (47.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (24-10).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (38-14).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss vs opponent of 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(91-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.4
The average score in these games was: Team 91, Opponent 90 (Total points scored = 181.1)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 65 (47.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (53-37).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (214-181).
Play Under - Home teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a game where both teams scored 90 points or less.
(42-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +20 units. Rating = 1*)
The average total posted in these games was: 184.7
The average score in these games was: Team 92.8, Opponent 86.6 (Total points scored = 179.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 31 (50% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (27-11).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (128-119).
Play Under - Home teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(155-102 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 94.4, Opponent 89.7 (Total points scored = 184)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 104 (40.8% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (90-59).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (395-311).
Play On - Road underdogs (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in December games.
(129-78 since 1996.) (62.3%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (71-146)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.9
The average score in these games was: Team 92.9, Opponent 97.2 (Average point differential = -4.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 79 (36.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (6-7).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (52-23).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (67-34).
Play On - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in December games.
(91-53 since 1996.) (63.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The straight up record of the team this system pertains to is : (53-98)
The average line posted in these games was: Opponent favored by 6.4
The average score in these games was: Team 93, Opponent 96.7 (Average point differential = -3.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the spread by 7 or more points was 57 (38% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (36-15).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (46-24).
StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the total
There are 34 situations with a total rating of 67 stars.
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - good free throw shooting team (76-79%) against an average free throw shooting team (72-76%), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +5.5 reb/game).
(50-19 since 1996.) (72.5%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*)
The average total posted in these games was: 188.9
The average score in these games was: Team 89.5, Opponent 92.9 (Total points scored = 182.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 36 (52.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (8-5).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (14-8).
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(106-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192.5
The average score in these games was: Team 96.1, Opponent 94.4 (Total points scored = 190.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 76 (44.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (39-35).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (213-162).
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(83-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192
The average score in these games was: Team 95.6, Opponent 93.6 (Total points scored = 189.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 61 (47.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (30-23).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (162-119).
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(321-227 since 1996.) (58.6%, +71.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 189.3
The average score in these games was: Team 93.3, Opponent 93.2 (Total points scored = 186.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 243 (44.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (94-76).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (138-98).
Play Under - Any team (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(72-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.7%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192.9
The average score in these games was: Team 96, Opponent 94.6 (Total points scored = 190.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 53 (46.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (24-26).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (132-100).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - extremely tired team - when playing their 3rd game in 4 days, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(63-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 184.8
The average score in these games was: Team 89.9, Opponent 90.7 (Total points scored = 180.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 45 (47.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (47-26).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (190-156).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - average 3PT shooting team (33-36.5%) against an average 3PT defense (33-36.5%), in a game involving two good rebounding teams (+3 to +5.5 reb/game).
(63-29 since 1996.) (68.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 91, Opponent 89.8 (Total points scored = 180.9)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 39 (42.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-0).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (14-6).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (19-12).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(567-427 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +97.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 92.1, Opponent 92.2 (Total points scored = 184.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 400 (40.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (6-14).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (340-247).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (1560-1347).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in December games.
(88-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.5
The average score in these games was: Team 90.6, Opponent 90.6 (Total points scored = 181.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 70 (50% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (58-32).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (234-206).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in December games.
(90-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.7
The average score in these games was: Team 93.5, Opponent 90.1 (Total points scored = 183.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 67 (46.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-7).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (56-37).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (230-215).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in December games.
(49-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.4
The average score in these games was: Team 89.8, Opponent 88.9 (Total points scored = 178.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 39 (57.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (32-14).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (130-97).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, first half of the season.
(210-143 since 1996.) (59.5%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.3
The average score in these games was: Team 92, Opponent 91.6 (Total points scored = 183.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 147 (41.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (50-24).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (73-38).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), in December games.
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 88, Opponent 88 (Total points scored = 176)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 20 (62.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (12-8).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (70-54).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(120-75 since 1996.) (61.5%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 90.9, Opponent 91 (Total points scored = 182)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 92 (47.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (24-10).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (38-14).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(167-110 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +46 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 91.9, Opponent 91 (Total points scored = 182.9)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 123 (44.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (98-65).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (366-280).
Play Under - Road teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in December games.
(24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185
The average score in these games was: Team 86.6, Opponent 89.9 (Total points scored = 176.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 21 (65.6% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (16-5).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (70-45).
Play Under - Road teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (PORTLAND) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, first half of the season.
(39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 89, Opponent 91.6 (Total points scored = 180.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 32 (55.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (26-12).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (111-73).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(106-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192.5
The average score in these games was: Team 96.1, Opponent 94.4 (Total points scored = 190.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 76 (44.7% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (39-35).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (213-162).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(83-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192
The average score in these games was: Team 95.6, Opponent 93.6 (Total points scored = 189.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 61 (47.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (30-23).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (162-119).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(321-227 since 1996.) (58.6%, +71.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 189.3
The average score in these games was: Team 93.3, Opponent 93.2 (Total points scored = 186.5)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 243 (44.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (94-76).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (138-98).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(60-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 192.8
The average score in these games was: Team 96.4, Opponent 93.6 (Total points scored = 190)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 43 (47.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-3).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (23-16).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (113-81).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(416-304 since 1996.) (57.8%, +81.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 189
The average score in these games was: Team 93.8, Opponent 93 (Total points scored = 186.8)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 319 (44.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (9-12).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (117-91).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (170-130).
Play Under - Any team (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%).
(250-168 since 1996.) (59.8%, +65.2 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 189.1
The average score in these games was: Team 93.2, Opponent 93.2 (Total points scored = 186.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 185 (44.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (5-7).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (74-60).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (105-75).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=36.5%) against an average 3PT shooting team (33-36.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(147-94 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.3
The average score in these games was: Team 93, Opponent 89.6 (Total points scored = 182.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 103 (43.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-2).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (89-59).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (222-163).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(567-427 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +97.3 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 92.1, Opponent 92.2 (Total points scored = 184.3)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 400 (40.3% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (6-14).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (340-247).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (1560-1347).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in December games.
(88-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.5
The average score in these games was: Team 90.6, Opponent 90.6 (Total points scored = 181.2)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 70 (50% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (58-32).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (234-206).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in December games.
(90-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.7
The average score in these games was: Team 93.5, Opponent 90.1 (Total points scored = 183.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 67 (46.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (3-7).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (56-37).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (230-215).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in December games.
(49-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.4
The average score in these games was: Team 89.8, Opponent 88.9 (Total points scored = 178.7)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 39 (57.4% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-5).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (32-14).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (130-97).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, first half of the season.
(210-143 since 1996.) (59.5%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.3
The average score in these games was: Team 92, Opponent 91.6 (Total points scored = 183.6)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 147 (41.9% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (4-8).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (50-24).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (73-38).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), in December games.
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.1
The average score in these games was: Team 88, Opponent 88 (Total points scored = 176)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 20 (62.5% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (12-8).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (70-54).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%), first half of the season.
(120-75 since 1996.) (61.5%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 90.9, Opponent 91 (Total points scored = 182)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 92 (47.2% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (2-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (24-10).
Over the last 5 seasons the situation's record is: (38-14).
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss vs opponent of 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(91-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.4
The average score in these games was: Team 91, Opponent 90 (Total points scored = 181.1)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 65 (47.1% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (0-1).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (53-37).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (214-181).
Play Under - Home teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a game where both teams scored 90 points or less.
(42-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +20 units. Rating = 1*)
The average total posted in these games was: 184.7
The average score in these games was: Team 92.8, Opponent 86.6 (Total points scored = 179.4)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 31 (50% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (27-11).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (128-119).
Play Under - Home teams where the total is between 180 and 189.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(155-102 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*)
The average total posted in these games was: 185.2
The average score in these games was: Team 94.4, Opponent 89.7 (Total points scored = 184)
The number of games in which this system covered the total by 7 or more points was 104 (40.8% of all games.)
The situation's record this season is: (1-4).
Over the last 3 seasons the situation's record is: (90-59).
Since 1996 the situation's record is: (395-311).
I did that to sort of prove a point about the treachery of trends. But there are times I use them, especially for over/unders as concerns the two teams playing. It is just one small factor in many. So if I like a game under and their history in the last 3 years is 75% over, I certainly give it another look. I don't think it is much help in football because of the lack of games. But hoops, hockey and baseball play enough against each other to at least look. I would never make a play based solely on a trend.
The fact that online books send you trend information in the mail and provide it on their site is proof enough that the information is meaningless/useless.
I can think of one, off the top of my head, that an old timer told me years ago before the internet.
A team playing it's 3rd road game in a row doesn't fare well.
But in today's info world, all that is already figured into the line.
You cannot win at this with the advantage the books have unless you have more money than God to move the lines to your favor.
Christ, all the books have the same line anymore. Not to mention, if you beat the shit out of your local, he might not pay you.
I don't believe anybody makes a long term profit at sportsbetting and especially enough to make a living from it. Maybe a small percentage of ONE percent can.
And I don't mean a whole 1%, I mean a small percentage of 1%
You can't convince me so don't try.
A team playing it's 3rd road game in a row doesn't fare well.
But in today's info world, all that is already figured into the line.
You cannot win at this with the advantage the books have unless you have more money than God to move the lines to your favor.
Christ, all the books have the same line anymore. Not to mention, if you beat the shit out of your local, he might not pay you.
I don't believe anybody makes a long term profit at sportsbetting and especially enough to make a living from it. Maybe a small percentage of ONE percent can.
And I don't mean a whole 1%, I mean a small percentage of 1%
You can't convince me so don't try.
Well a monkey should be able to pick 50% and we add all our knowledge and the books are making a making a pretty good living because we can't hit 60%.
I like to bet on streaks extending. Not very scientific but what the heck.
I like to bet on streaks extending. Not very scientific but what the heck.
I think streaks is a good strategy - especially in baseball. Again, it is only one part of the overall plan, but it is helpful in baseball. I think the best use of any information is what is best for you.
Must agree with Jack - points well taken.
Must agree with Jack - points well taken.
what i believe the secret to winning money betting all sports......ALWAYS INVEST YOUR MONEY IN THE BETTER TEAM....dont bet bad teams.....look for situations when the better team had UNDER-achieved in its last game and they are playing a bad team that has OVER-achieved In their last game.
RECENT EXAMPLE....last monday nite....
nyg off a home loss to philly...lost by 7 in a pick game......played wash. off a blowout road win at oakland....
think we all would agree that nyg is a better team than wash....
also what you look for is based on these two recent games....nyg lookin bad and wash looked good....you look for the public....jumping on the worse team...wash....read different post pick forums like madjacks and see what majority of people are on.....you see alot of support for the bad team [wash] then this helps solidy my play on nyg even more.....those websites and sporrtsbooks that release public percentages are bullshit in my opinion....you get a true feel for public opinion right here at madjacks and other sites like this one...
also the recent loss by nyg and big win by wash..line gets adjusted down...in my favor as linesmakers know wash will get support based on last game....nyg -3 was a gift in my opinion...
i would say if nyg played wash ten times on a neutral field nyg the way more talented team would easily win 8 of 10 times...
ANYWAY....this approach can be used with all sports...find a winning team in a favorable situation.....off a bad loss....winning teams are winning teams because they win...they have talented players....they play with heart and dont like to lose...so they usually bounce back with a strong effort...
match this up with a bad/losing team that just won big.....bad teams revert to their losing ways...
winning takes being selective and discipline and i try but im def. not there yet...sticking to your winning plan and avoiding action plays is key...
as far as trends go.....i look for league-wide trends...in other words how teams react to certain situations...i dont look at individual teams i look at all the teams...and i research these situations myself.....think this is key...develop your own trends...research them...what you are looking for is unique situations that could alter the emotion of teams performance in its next game....
heres one for JACK for mlb that if you only played this all season you would win money every year...and its so simple.....bet on any winning team....has to be a team with .550 win percentage or more...bet this team after theyve lost 2-games in a row and only if they are pickem or a dog...there is usuall about 200 plays a year...last year it was 100-78...key is you are always playing the dog...getting plus money back with a winning team...this will make money every for you every year...if you are disciplined enuff to stick with....
so jack, try it this baseball season and you will win money!!
then you can stop saying that you cant win betting sports...
o well im done...bored waiting to go to christmas eve dinner with family...hope this helps someone...
gluck all and merry christmas
burgh.
RECENT EXAMPLE....last monday nite....
nyg off a home loss to philly...lost by 7 in a pick game......played wash. off a blowout road win at oakland....
think we all would agree that nyg is a better team than wash....
also what you look for is based on these two recent games....nyg lookin bad and wash looked good....you look for the public....jumping on the worse team...wash....read different post pick forums like madjacks and see what majority of people are on.....you see alot of support for the bad team [wash] then this helps solidy my play on nyg even more.....those websites and sporrtsbooks that release public percentages are bullshit in my opinion....you get a true feel for public opinion right here at madjacks and other sites like this one...
also the recent loss by nyg and big win by wash..line gets adjusted down...in my favor as linesmakers know wash will get support based on last game....nyg -3 was a gift in my opinion...
i would say if nyg played wash ten times on a neutral field nyg the way more talented team would easily win 8 of 10 times...
ANYWAY....this approach can be used with all sports...find a winning team in a favorable situation.....off a bad loss....winning teams are winning teams because they win...they have talented players....they play with heart and dont like to lose...so they usually bounce back with a strong effort...
match this up with a bad/losing team that just won big.....bad teams revert to their losing ways...
winning takes being selective and discipline and i try but im def. not there yet...sticking to your winning plan and avoiding action plays is key...
as far as trends go.....i look for league-wide trends...in other words how teams react to certain situations...i dont look at individual teams i look at all the teams...and i research these situations myself.....think this is key...develop your own trends...research them...what you are looking for is unique situations that could alter the emotion of teams performance in its next game....
heres one for JACK for mlb that if you only played this all season you would win money every year...and its so simple.....bet on any winning team....has to be a team with .550 win percentage or more...bet this team after theyve lost 2-games in a row and only if they are pickem or a dog...there is usuall about 200 plays a year...last year it was 100-78...key is you are always playing the dog...getting plus money back with a winning team...this will make money every for you every year...if you are disciplined enuff to stick with....
so jack, try it this baseball season and you will win money!!
then you can stop saying that you cant win betting sports...
o well im done...bored waiting to go to christmas eve dinner with family...hope this helps someone...
gluck all and merry christmas
burgh.
Last edited:
Good advice, Steel. But we all know the Giants won Monday because the underdog won Sunday night.
That was a close game :142smilie and you can tell Daniel Snyder to go fuck himself :sadwave:
