True (RED) Colors: Fox News parent company donates $1 million to Republican Governors

MB MLB 728x90 Jpg

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Another example of big business starting to take over our political system, thanks to the big business lapdogs on the Supreme Court. Can't wait for the next discussion about the liberal media and Fox News being "Fair and Balanced." :mj07:

Fox News parent company donates $1 million to Republican Governors Association
By Stephen C. Webster

It's long been known that the Fox News Channel leans heavily toward the political right, but this is just ridiculous.

News Corporation, the Rupert Murdoch-owned media giant and parent company to the Fox News Channel, The Wall Street Journal, New York Post and the Fox television network, has given $1 million to the Republican Governors Association (RGA).

The disclosure was made in the RGA's most recent IRS filing.

"News Corporation believes in the power of free markets, and the RGA?s pro-business agenda supports our priorities at this most critical time for our economy," a News Corp spokesman told Politico's Ben Smith.

To watchdog group Media Matters, a clear pattern has emerged.

Sixteen months ago, we drew attention to Fox News Senior Vice President Bill Shine's characterization of his network as the "voice of the opposition." Ever since, we've been demonstrating how the network has been living up to his words.

In September, we defined Fox News as a conservative political organization, noting that the network had been openly advocating against the Democratic Congress and White House through extreme promotion of anti-government rallies, witch hunts against administration officials, and by urging their audience to call Congress and the White House to protest Democratic policies.

In October, we revealed the revolving door between the Republican Party and Fox News Channel, with a number of former Bush administration officials, former and potentially future GOP presidential candidates, and Republican strategists on Fox's payroll and airwaves.

In November, we chronicled Fox News' promotion of Conservative Party congressional candidate Doug Hoffman, New Jersey Republican gubernatorial candidate Chris Christie, and Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell in the run-up to the November 3 election. We also noted how Fox News hosts and analysts spent Election Day promoting their candidacies.

Over at Think Progress, a study of News Corp's company policies raises questions as to whether the large gift is in violation of their own rules.

In a subsection on dealing with government officials, the company policy states:

2. No payment shall be made to, or for the benefit of, any public official in order to induce or entice such official to: enact, defeat or violate any law or regulation for the Company?s benefit; influence any official act; or obtain any favorable action by a governmental agency or official on behalf of the Company.

3. Social amenities, entertainment and other courtesies may be extended to government officials or employees only to the extent appropriate and reasonable under applicable laws and customs. Gifts of greater than nominal value to, or lavish entertainment of, public officials are prohibited. No gifts in the form of cash, stock or other similar consideration shall be given, regardless of amount. Any gift about which an employee is uncertain should not be made without the prior written approval of the Company?s General Counsel. Any expenses incurred by a Company employee in connection with the matters discussed herein shall be accurately recorded on the Company?s books and records.

The Democratic Governors Association has not received any money from News Corp.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Another example of big business starting to take over our political system, thanks to the big business lapdogs on the Supreme Court. Can't wait for the next discussion about the liberal media and Fox News being "Fair and Balanced." :mj07:

Fox News parent company donates $1 million to Republican Governors Association
By Stephen C. Webster

It's long been known that the Fox News Channel leans heavily toward the political right, but this is just ridiculous.

News Corporation, the Rupert Murdoch-owned media giant and parent company to the Fox News Channel, The Wall Street Journal, New York Post and the Fox television network, has given $1 million to the Republican Governors Association (RGA).

The disclosure was made in the RGA's most recent IRS filing.

"News Corporation believes in the power of free markets, and the RGA?s pro-business agenda supports our priorities at this most critical time for our economy," a News Corp spokesman told Politico's Ben Smith.

To watchdog group Media Matters, a clear pattern has emerged.

Sixteen months ago, we drew attention to Fox News Senior Vice President Bill Shine's characterization of his network as the "voice of the opposition." Ever since, we've been demonstrating how the network has been living up to his words.

In September, we defined Fox News as a conservative political organization, noting that the network had been openly advocating against the Democratic Congress and White House through extreme promotion of anti-government rallies, witch hunts against administration officials, and by urging their audience to call Congress and the White House to protest Democratic policies.

In October, we revealed the revolving door between the Republican Party and Fox News Channel, with a number of former Bush administration officials, former and potentially future GOP presidential candidates, and Republican strategists on Fox's payroll and airwaves.

In November, we chronicled Fox News' promotion of Conservative Party congressional candidate Doug Hoffman, New Jersey Republican gubernatorial candidate Chris Christie, and Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell in the run-up to the November 3 election. We also noted how Fox News hosts and analysts spent Election Day promoting their candidacies.

Over at Think Progress, a study of News Corp's company policies raises questions as to whether the large gift is in violation of their own rules.

In a subsection on dealing with government officials, the company policy states:

2. No payment shall be made to, or for the benefit of, any public official in order to induce or entice such official to: enact, defeat or violate any law or regulation for the Company?s benefit; influence any official act; or obtain any favorable action by a governmental agency or official on behalf of the Company.

3. Social amenities, entertainment and other courtesies may be extended to government officials or employees only to the extent appropriate and reasonable under applicable laws and customs. Gifts of greater than nominal value to, or lavish entertainment of, public officials are prohibited. No gifts in the form of cash, stock or other similar consideration shall be given, regardless of amount. Any gift about which an employee is uncertain should not be made without the prior written approval of the Company?s General Counsel. Any expenses incurred by a Company employee in connection with the matters discussed herein shall be accurately recorded on the Company?s books and records.

The Democratic Governors Association has not received any money from News Corp.

You can send a thank-you card to John Roberts and Samuel "I am not an idealog" Alito for allowing unlimited private money funds to politicians. I hear they are both birthers, and that's why Roberts fucked up the Oath of Office, the only Justice ever to do so.

Or maybe he's just that stupid. Yeah, that's it - Roberts is so stupid that he's a birther who couldn't remember the oath.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
It just makes me very concerned about where this is all going - no matter who gets the corporation money. I would have much preferred to see taking unions out of the contribution mix than have our individual representation rights demeaned to the point it clearly now will be - even more than before. Still have not heard one good reason FOR this ruling, by anyone. Just the complaint that if it's ok for unions, it should be ok for every corporation in the world to fund specific politicians and parties, which is not a good reason FOR this ruling, IMO.

Conservatives rail against big government and protecting individual rights. This destroys individual rights, IMO.
 
MB NCAAF 728x90 Jpg

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
object>


As I write, our last combat troops are leaving Iraq, live on two cable tv stations. What a great sight to see for our country. The other station is promoting republican candidates, allowing them to promote their websites begging for money.
 
Last edited:

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
It just makes me very concerned about where this is all going - no matter who gets the corporation money. I would have much preferred to see taking unions out of the contribution mix than have our individual representation rights demeaned to the point it clearly now will be - even more than before. Still have not heard one good reason FOR this ruling, by anyone. Just the complaint that if it's ok for unions, it should be ok for every corporation in the world to fund specific politicians and parties, which is not a good reason FOR this ruling, IMO.

Conservatives rail against big government and protecting individual rights. This destroys individual rights, IMO.
It was by far and away the most undemocratic ruling of the Supreme Court in modern times.

It's funny Chad... I get the same argument for the ruling from conservative friends of mine, as if unions could possibly compete with the corporate wealth of this country. Unions represent only 7.5% of the private sector and 11% of the public sector. The U.S. is now one of the least unionized countries in the industrialized world.
 
Top