UFC, DLH fight, and sports (long)

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
52
I watched a tape of the DLH-Vargas fight after watching that football game last night. It really makes it sink in how other sports have pretty arbitrary rules that remove people from actually just going out and trying to bash another guy until he can't get up. It reminded me of why I like the fights so much. I'll take a good fight over a good football game anyday, and a big time championship fight over the superbowl.

That guy Max Kellerman on ESPN is fond of saying that the thing that is great about boxing is that it is as close to the literal imposition of one man's will over another man as any sport offers. It actually has the component that a person wants to get up and keep going but his will has been separated from his body and he simply can't do it.

Its a nice way to put it.

But even boxing has some pretty funny rules, gloves and rounds and judging, etc. It made me wonder of Ultimate Fighting will ever catch on. From what I understand, the only rule there is no eye gouging. Put two guys in a cage and let them go at it until one quits. No gloves, pads, balls, rounds, hoops, or anything.

Really, its probably not too far from where boxing was 100-150 years ago. Kind of an outlaw sport with a dedicated following. I've only watched it once. I enjoyed it, but I don't think the spectator aspect of it is as good as boxing. I'd like to hear comments from anyone that is into that sport about whether I have the rules right, and what is good/bad about it. Where's it going? Is it growing?

Anyway, I thought DLH-Vargas was a very good fight. Not great but very good. Vargas out power-punched him. DLH out boxed him. Classic match-up. I still thinking Vargas getting 2-1 was a decent bet. He had some chances early to do more damage, but DLH showed his class as the fight went on.

But that was just two tough mother-fvckers letting the fists fly. It was pretty clean for the most part, and for a long time, the outcome was unclear.

The woman judge HAD to be on the take. The most atrocious round was when she scored the 10th 10-10, ensuring that even if she gave the last two rounds to DLH her man would come out ahead. That was a fairly even round, then DLH just walloped Vargas at the end, easily giving the round to DLH and you couldnt' miss it from ANY angle. How she had him ahead by 3 going into that round is another story.

The 8th was just a beautiful boxing exhibition by DLH and showed why he's such a talent. Great movement, he's got a LONG jab but he's so quick he gets away with it. I think people that fight him don't realize how far away he can be and still jab you. It was also that round that he threw a right just above the belt, a left hook a little higher, a right to the ribs, then a left hook to the head. Right up the ladder. Just like working the heavy bag. Vargas was reacting to the first one when the hook to the head caught him.

Another thing, Foreman is a good fight analyst, and I don't care if you think other wise. Really pay attention to him next time you watch one of his fights. He picks up on technical things in their feet position, other tendencies, and points them out as they happen. By tendencies, I mean the "sweet science" stuff -- stuff like, "Guy A always drops his left after throwing a right. He's going to get hit with a big counter right." Next thing you know, the guy gets plugged with a counter after throwing his right. He knows WAY more about fighting than his partners. He may not know more than Manny Stewart but he's better at pointing things out.

Whoa. Thanks for reading this far. Any comments on DLH-V, UFC, or anything welcome.

TheShrimp
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
Haven't watched UFC since VI, but I really enjoyed watching this event. If I remember correctly there are rounds--but maybe not. It's been a long time since I have seen one.

Is the guy that starts the fights--"Let's Get It On!"--still working these?

UFC is not for the PC world that we have created, but it is better than most of the boxing matches that the general public sees.

Good thoughts.
 

acehistr8

Senior Pats Fan
Forum Member
Jun 20, 2002
2,543
5
0
Northern VA
I said this before after the Olympics and I will say it again that sums up my feelings about boxing and for my buddies who tell me what a great "sport" it is:

It is not a real sport if the outcome can be taken out of the participants hands. Period. Boxing is so filthy dirty it makes me sick. You cannot call something a sport if at the end of the match/game, the outcome can soley be determined by other people. If the outcome is not solely determined on said field of play, it is not a sport in my mind. Sure I enjoy watching the fights, but to me boxing will never be an equal of football or any other sport.

I dont know how UFC works but my understanding is they just beat the bloody piss out of each other.
 

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
52
acehistr8 said:

It is not a real sport if the outcome can be taken out of the participants hands. Period. Boxing is so filthy dirty it makes me sick.
In all sports the results can be taken out of the participants hands. Just not so obviously as in boxing.

As to being "so filthy dirty". Well, it has its filthy/dirty elements, but I doubt you can really point out too many underhanded or illegal things that have happened for a while. I mean like a decision going absolutely the wrong way in everyone's opinion.

Maybe the Lewis-Holyfield fight that ended in a draw. I think it might happen more in the lower ranks where guys are putting together their records and that kind of thing.

But, I'll agree with you that the judging aspect is a major problem in enjoying boxing as a sport. I guess it never really bothered me, but I can see where it could bug somebody. But still, what you see in fight, two guys trying bash each other till one can't continue is the essence of athletic competition, IMO.

Compare that to two guys with rackets hitting a ball over a net until one hits it "out" or it goes past another guy. Its not even close.
 

Hoops

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 10, 1999
2,706
0
0
UFC adopted more rules since it's early days...the list of things a fighter can't do has grown. The ref is still there...Big John McCarthy...he doesn't ref all the fights though.

An organization that has better fighters and is higher quality IMO is Pride..basically the Japanese version of UFC.
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
77
So Cal
Totally agree with comments about the female judge in question. Would love to know her background and who got her in there. It often seems that in major fights there is one person that is totally off base.
 

Dutchmasta

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 12, 2002
21
0
0
RE UFC rules

RE UFC rules

In the UFC it is illegal to headbutt. Also I think it is illegal to kick a guy who is down. When the UFC first came out these rules were legal, but then eventually they became illegal due to certain circumstances or results.
 

Nick Douglas

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2000
3,688
15
0
47
Los Angeles, CA, USA
UFC and PRIDE have similar rules but PRIDE allows a few things like knees on the ground that UFC doesn't. Hoops is right on the money that the better fighters fight in PRIDE. PRIDE is a Japanese promotion so they also get a lot of pro wrestlers to fight. In Japan pro wrestling is much closer to mixed martial arts than in the U.S. Being a legit tough guy and winning "real" fights in PRIDE and UFC often can be a catalyst to pro wrestling success. PRIDE has also had a few worked fights in the past to build for future fights and some of their legit fighters have had a few pro wrestling matches. In fact, one of their big stars, formerl NFLer Bob Sapp, is going to have his first pro wrestling match soon.

As far as crooked judges or refs go, it doesn't affect my impression of the sport at all. Judges are a necessary part of both sports for the long term safety of the fighters and, yes, it is possible to get some corruption. Still, the sport itself is great and in my opinion nothing, not even the Super Bowl, matches the excitement of a big time heavyweight (or even in some cases, welterweight or middleweight) championship fight. The hot chicks at ringside, the celebs in the stands, the entrances and, of course, the thrill of the knockdowns and knockouts are something that team sports just can't match.

For those that want a taste of UFC but haven't seen it in a while, tomorrow's show really has a lineup of good fights and I would recommend checking it out.
 

He Hate Me

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 21, 2001
483
0
0
Seal Beach,Ca
Hoops,


I think Mccarthy died. UFC has less injuries than your avrage football game. I wish football had analyists as good as MAx Kellerman.
 

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
52
thanks for all the comments.

The "up the ladder" combo I was talking about was actually the 10th. It was the one that staggered him and set him up for the 11th round KO. I've watched that fight a couple more times. I really enjoy it. They're talking about vargas getting back in the fight because DLH isn't finishing him just as the hook knocks him down in the 11th. Funny stuff.

I saw UFC once. One match I saw a guy get slammed to the mat, which knocked him out and before the other guy realized it he had already broken his collarbone with a "palm" punch. What a tough sport.

Most times it just seems to become technical stuff on the ground. I suppose that's good for people who know what's going on, but its sort of hard to get into.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top