VB Series Aust. v S.Lanka > 5th ODI

british bulldog

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2002
695
1
0
61
England, u.k.
The bookies must think Australia are reeling from the fifth Test defeat by England because there's no other explanation for their odds on Thursday's VB Series clash against Sri Lanka. These two sides met in the last game of the VB Series before Christmas and the Australians won by 142 runs in Perth.

Indeed the Aussies have won three out of three in a canter in this competition so far while Sri Lanka have been hammered in all their three games - including twice by England.

Yet whereas Ricky Ponting's side were 1/6 to beat them in Perth there is some 1/4 available about the Australians in Sydney. It's fair to say that the fifth Test did look a game too far for them but Jason Gillespie was the man who appeared most tired and he's been ruled out through injury in any case.

There's the usual fierce competition for places in the Australian side and with the World Cup taking place next month that has an extra edge to it at the moment. Queensland all-rounder Andrew Symonds has been drafted in for Thursday and he'd walk into any other one-day side in the world which shows the depth of talent available.

And anyone thinking Sri Lanka are about to step up on their lamentable pre-Christmas efforts should think again. They were annihilated by 10 wickets against Australia A at Adelaide on Tuesday, collapsing to 65 all out in 25 overs. Highest scorer was extras with 26 which just about sums up how the Sri Lankans have played in Australia so far. There was even time for a second 25-over exhibition game which Sri Lanka fared slightly better in - though they were never in danger of overhauling Australia A's 171, eventually losing by 25 runs.

They've seemingly been interested only in picking up bonus points in the VB Series to date - though it's not going to do them much good unless they can produce some vastly improved displays in the second half of the tournament. The only positive piece of news for Sri Lanka supporters concerns the return of spinner Muttiah Muralitharan for Thursday's game. Given that he has 297 one-day victims to his name he will obviously pep up the Sri Lankan attack but how sharp he'll be after his hernia operation remains to be seen.

England were 12/1 to win the fifth Test and it's not just with hindsight that it looked a decent price as yours truly tipped it up before the game. But how anyone can make a case for Sri Lanka at no bigger than 7/2 here is beyond me.

Indeed I wouldn't put anyone off backing the Aussies at 1/4 but that price will probably only appeal to the big hitters.

However there does look a great bet at 5/6 courtesy of Bet365's player performance quote on Adam Gilchrist where 1pt is awarded per run, 10pts per catch and 25pts per stumping. The Aussie wicketkeeper forms half of a destructive opening batting partnership with Matthew Hayden and he comes into the game in prime form after scoring 170 runs with the bat in the fifth Ashes Test as well as taking five catches and snaffling a stumping.

In truth his work with the gloves in Sydney wasn't top class so he may just have a point to prove here which makes the under/over figure of 47.5 look far too low. There's every chance he'll cover it with his batting alone given that he's scored 53 and 124 runs already in his two games to date in the VB Series (he was rested for the clash against Sri Lanka in Perth). Indeed his one-day average against Sri Lanka is 55.77 while overall in his limited overs career for Australia he averages 1.4 catches per game and a stumping every four games.

Given that we know he's in great nick and against such a feeble Sri Lankan side, Gilchrist looks a great bet to score at least the 48pts required (his make-ups in the two games against a stronger England side were 63 and 124).



A GILCHRIST above 47.5 points @ 5/6 2 points (bet365 player performance)
 
Last edited:

british bulldog

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2002
695
1
0
61
England, u.k.
Lets get the bad news out the way first.

Gilchrists total points only made up to 31 so the bet was a loser.

Secondly, Australia lost , well in fact they were hammered, so my futures bet becomes a loser so thats a total of 4 points lost.


Now for those Aussies out there who read and contribute to these threads, this is for you.

Aren't you concerned that when McGrath and Warne finish their international careers, which will be in about two years time, you have absolutly nothing in quality to replace them with. You as a cricket nation will marely become also rans in the cricketing world.

You were beaten in the 5th test by England without these two great players, infact you were beaten in every session accept one.

You follow that performance up with what can only be described as a shambolic performance. You allow a side who cant bat on hard bouncing wickets to amass 342 runs and then your effort in chasing finished before 10 overs were bowled.

The bowling was indisciplined, countless no-balls and wides. No line or length, no bowling wicket to wicket. The deliveries were wide and short and got the deserved treatment. Answer me this, How do both Symonds and Watson get in the squad, let alone play, in place of Harvey, who is one of the best bowlers in the limited over game.

Not only was the bowling piss awful but the fielding wasn't to far behind. Dropped catches, shoddy return thrws to the keeper, outfielding poor.

If this is the best the Australians can do without Warne and McGrath then the rest of the world have nothing to worry about.
 

Pumpkin

Registered User
Forum Member
May 9, 2002
159
0
0
51
Canberra, Australia
Couldn't agree more BB

I've spent the entire summer trying to explain to people that this Australian team has two of the best bowlers, not only in the world at the moment, but of all time. It is interesting to see that without Warne and McGrath, not only does the attack look thin, but the other teams seem to have a great weight lifted from their shoulders.

The last two matches have seen the Australians pay for what has been ordinary feilding over the last 12 months. What once was the best catching and ground fielding side is starting to decline. I think this is because of two reasons. Taking M.Waugh out of the slips has upset the balance of the side, combine this with Langer no longer at short leg - Shane Warne missing now as well, almost all of the team are fielding in positions they aren't used to. The other factor is Gilchrist is keeping very poorly. His glovework and footwork seem to be sluggish, and maybe the task of carrying a fragile middle order in Test cricket and opening the batting in one dayers is starting to take toll. The man is a asset that Australia does not want to burn out
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top