Watching Episode #1 OJ mini series

rrc

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
2,503
13
0
I watched it.

Gotta say that I have to disagree with you on this one.

Schwimmer and Travolta were overacting to the max imo.
 

Wineguy

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 7, 2000
6,963
264
83
Atlanta, GA
No, not watching. And, according to the guys in this thread, it seems your taste in things "done well" are not so much, and movie reviews by you should be disregarded. Sound about right?
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
Watched it
Thought it was thrilling and well done

But

Always thought oj did it and episode 1 has all the evidence you need to convict......but wen Shapiro asked him if he did it l, cuba.....err...oj said no, good enough for me.
 

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,723
237
63
53
BG, KY, USA
I had a patient last week who said Nichole had a massive blow habit, and OJ told her he was done funding her. She kept getting it on credit, OJ wouldn't pay, so they hit her and framed him. The patient who told me this claimed to know who was responsible, but no way to know if he was being straight or not.
 

hammer1

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 17, 2002
7,791
127
63
Wisconsin and Dorado Puerto Rico
I had a patient last week who said Nichole had a massive blow habit, and OJ told her he was done funding her. She kept getting it on credit, OJ wouldn't pay, so they hit her and framed him. The patient who told me this claimed to know who was responsible, but no way to know if he was being straight or not.


3 things bothered me

#1 Splattered blood vs spilled blood on the sock

@2 there was zero ..no blood found in the drain in his house

#3 Satellites photograph every square inch of the planet every 20 minutes...Why dint they get em and see where the bronco was during the timeline ??
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,705
265
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
The blood on the sock was soaked through both sides of the sock meaning there was no foot in the sock.

Officer Risky, the first officer on the scene walked into Nicole's house and took the sheet off her bed and covered her body with it.
She had skin and blood under her finger nails which could not be matched to O.J.
There were several shoe prints in the blood that could not be matched to anyone including O.J.
The only blood of O.J.s found at the scene was found weeks after initial inspection and the day after a physician testified to drawing blood from o.j. and handing that vial to detective Van Atter who then proceeded to walk right by the evidence room three times with that blood in his pocket and go to both the crime scene and o.j.s house. Not surprisingly a single drop off blood was found on the back gate shortly thereafter. The next day Van Atter checks in the blood evidence to the evidence room where it is found to be missing 1 1/2 mls of blood. Once this was identified by the defense during trial the state was allowed to bring that doctor back to the stand and allowed to alter his testimony.
Mark Fuhrman discovered all the evidence and knew where o.j. lived.
Oddly the glove at the crime scene was dried and crusty yet the glove found me than for hours later was wet and sticky.
The total amount of blood in the bronco amounted to less than 1/10 of 1 drop of blood.
All of o.j.s blood found at the scene was found to have high levels of preservatives in it that does not occur naturally only when in a test tube.
Why did Fuhrman enter the condo and use her phone rather than using the radio in his hand? Why did he let the water out of the tub without checking the temperature of it first.
The coroner was not called for around 9 hours. By the time be arrived he could only predict the time of death within a five hour window. The timeline is predicated on a woman saying she heard a dog barking at 1045p and she knew the time because that's when her husband came home from work, however her husband testified he didn't get home until 1115p.
A maid testified she saw someone running from the scene at around 1105p. Her testimony was not allowed.

There's soooooooo much more wrong with this case, I could go on for hours.

I do believe this was a drug related execution.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 

hammer1

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 17, 2002
7,791
127
63
Wisconsin and Dorado Puerto Rico
The blood on the sock was soaked through both sides of the sock meaning there was no foot in the sock.

Officer Risky, the first officer on the scene walked into Nicole's house and took the sheet off her bed and covered her body with it.
She had skin and blood under her finger nails which could not be matched to O.J.
There were several shoe prints in the blood that could not be matched to anyone including O.J.
The only blood of O.J.s found at the scene was found weeks after initial inspection and the day after a physician testified to drawing blood from o.j. and handing that vial to detective Van Atter who then proceeded to walk right by the evidence room three times with that blood in his pocket and go to both the crime scene and o.j.s house. Not surprisingly a single drop off blood was found on the back gate shortly thereafter. The next day Van Atter checks in the blood evidence to the evidence room where it is found to be missing 1 1/2 mls of blood. Once this was identified by the defense during trial the state was allowed to bring that doctor back to the stand and allowed to alter his testimony.
Mark Fuhrman discovered all the evidence and knew where o.j. lived.
Oddly the glove at the crime scene was dried and crusty yet the glove found me than for hours later was wet and sticky.
The total amount of blood in the bronco amounted to less than 1/10 of 1 drop of blood.
All of o.j.s blood found at the scene was found to have high levels of preservatives in it that does not occur naturally only when in a test tube.
Why did Fuhrman enter the condo and use her phone rather than using the radio in his hand? Why did he let the water out of the tub without checking the temperature of it first.
The coroner was not called for around 9 hours. By the time be arrived he could only predict the time of death within a five hour window. The timeline is predicated on a woman saying she heard a dog barking at 1045p and she knew the time because that's when her husband came home from work, however her husband testified he didn't get home until 1115p.
A maid testified she saw someone running from the scene at around 1105p. Her testimony was not allowed.

There's soooooooo much more wrong with this case, I could go on for hours.

I do believe this was a drug related execution.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Very good as usual...FDC
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
The blood on the sock was soaked through both sides of the sock meaning there was no foot in the sock.

Officer Risky, the first officer on the scene walked into Nicole's house and took the sheet off her bed and covered her body with it.
She had skin and blood under her finger nails which could not be matched to O.J.
There were several shoe prints in the blood that could not be matched to anyone including O.J.
The only blood of O.J.s found at the scene was found weeks after initial inspection and the day after a physician testified to drawing blood from o.j. and handing that vial to detective Van Atter who then proceeded to walk right by the evidence room three times with that blood in his pocket and go to both the crime scene and o.j.s house. Not surprisingly a single drop off blood was found on the back gate shortly thereafter. The next day Van Atter checks in the blood evidence to the evidence room where it is found to be missing 1 1/2 mls of blood. Once this was identified by the defense during trial the state was allowed to bring that doctor back to the stand and allowed to alter his testimony.
Mark Fuhrman discovered all the evidence and knew where o.j. lived.
Oddly the glove at the crime scene was dried and crusty yet the glove found me than for hours later was wet and sticky.
The total amount of blood in the bronco amounted to less than 1/10 of 1 drop of blood.
All of o.j.s blood found at the scene was found to have high levels of preservatives in it that does not occur naturally only when in a test tube.
Why did Fuhrman enter the condo and use her phone rather than using the radio in his hand? Why did he let the water out of the tub without checking the temperature of it first.
The coroner was not called for around 9 hours. By the time be arrived he could only predict the time of death within a five hour window. The timeline is predicated on a woman saying she heard a dog barking at 1045p and she knew the time because that's when her husband came home from work, however her husband testified he didn't get home until 1115p.
A maid testified she saw someone running from the scene at around 1105p. Her testimony was not allowed.

There's soooooooo much more wrong with this case, I could go on for hours.

I do believe this was a drug related execution.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Why am i not surprised you're someone who thinks he's innocent.

Maybe kaepernick did it!
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,697
599
113
49
TX
Watched the first episode last night and Its AWESOME so far. Its good to see behind the scenes and not just the court drama that played out 20+ years ago, I was fascinated with the case back then, I set it up to record on the vcr when I was in college
 

The Boys

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 17, 2001
15,365
217
0
78
Royal Oak, Michigan, a Detroit Suburb
Watched the first episode last night and Its AWESOME so far. Its good to see behind the scenes and not just the court drama that played out 20+ years ago, I was fascinated with the case back then, I set it up to record on the vcr when I was in college


FX network tops its Emmy-winning miniseries ?Fargo? with the crazy and riveting ?The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story,? premiering Tuesday.

http://nypost.com/2016/01/28/the-o-j-simpson-miniseries-is-the-first-must-watch-show-of-2016/
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top