Record:
ATS 14-13-2
O/U 4-3
Yes both of these plays are big time chalk but that has been the trend this year especially road Favs and I'm not yet ready to risk any money betting against this trend.
TB -3.5 (when I capped this game I figured the line to be -10)
TB's offense is not spectacular but it is effective.
Most of the starters on the left side of the SF offensive line are either injured or not playing, that does not bode well for Garcia.
KC -3.5 (when I capped this game I figured the line to be -6.5)
I'm not buying any of dat MNF Raiders BS, I said it last week and I'll say it again "Raiders are pathetic".
I've looked at 3 or 4 of consensus sites and both of these teams have been picked in the 70% or more range and yet the line does not move.
Is it that the odds makers are keeping the line where it is to make us second guess ourselves where we start with the over-analysis until we believe that SF or OAK could have a good chance of winning?
Or perhaps there is more than meets the eye in these games and there are huge sums of money bet on the 2 dogs.
I'm intrigued to see the outcome of both of these games. I think, for me, there may be some good lessons to be learned.
Whatever side you take..........
ATS 14-13-2
O/U 4-3
Yes both of these plays are big time chalk but that has been the trend this year especially road Favs and I'm not yet ready to risk any money betting against this trend.
TB -3.5 (when I capped this game I figured the line to be -10)
TB's offense is not spectacular but it is effective.
Most of the starters on the left side of the SF offensive line are either injured or not playing, that does not bode well for Garcia.
KC -3.5 (when I capped this game I figured the line to be -6.5)
I'm not buying any of dat MNF Raiders BS, I said it last week and I'll say it again "Raiders are pathetic".
I've looked at 3 or 4 of consensus sites and both of these teams have been picked in the 70% or more range and yet the line does not move.
Is it that the odds makers are keeping the line where it is to make us second guess ourselves where we start with the over-analysis until we believe that SF or OAK could have a good chance of winning?
Or perhaps there is more than meets the eye in these games and there are huge sums of money bet on the 2 dogs.
I'm intrigued to see the outcome of both of these games. I think, for me, there may be some good lessons to be learned.
Whatever side you take..........