Weiner deal

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,424
128
63
Bowling Green Ky
Got a question--

The Dems are now all lining up for Weiner to step down-- however diff story in 1999
-- when there was "smoking gun" :)
and perjury and obstruction convictions which Clinton was disbarred for--

--yet EVERY DEM in senate voted not quilty of charges of perjury and obstructions and against Clinton resigning.

What makes this different?

The vote--
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/02/12/senate.vote/
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
57
In the shadows
not quilty of charges

What is not quilty?

thumbnail.aspx
 

ImFeklhr

Raconteur
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2005
4,585
129
0
San Francisco

12 years later... there has been turnover in congress (some)...
Clinton was termed out anyway (Weiner could stay forever)....
Plus there is a big difference in pushing out the leader of the free world (it almost was a free world back then, at least more so) for nickel and dime bullshit. Nobody on the world political or military scene gives a shit about 1 congressmen out of hundreds.

Those are the differences I see. I am sure there are others. :0003
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,833
47
48
Ohio
I would hope that the people elected to govern this country would be above this type of chicanery.

I do not care - D or R or I.

This BS should not be happening with elected officials.

It should not be an issue to resign. He and any one else who does this BS should be booted.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
12 years later... there has been turnover in congress (some)...
Clinton was termed out anyway (Weiner could stay forever)....
Plus there is a big difference in pushing out the leader of the free world (it almost was a free world back then, at least more so) for nickel and dime bullshit. Nobody on the world political or military scene gives a shit about 1 congressmen out of hundreds.

Those are the differences I see. I am sure there are others. :0003

Thanks for bringing some common sense into the discussion, as always. Another example of Wayne's wiener for Clinton that has not gone away after all these years, and he still rails on some of us for bringing up Bush in comparisons.

I don't remember the same comparison's coming out when conservative legislators were exposed for their various indiscretions - but I think ALL of us know that. It's just interesting to see Wayne still saying he doesn't always bring up Clinton in multiple threads, and then he brings Clinton up decades later... you just can't make it up... :SIB
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,493
256
83
Victory Lane
Thanks for bringing some common sense into the discussion, as always. Another example of Wayne's wiener for Clinton that has not gone away after all these years, and he still rails on some of us for bringing up Bush in comparisons.

I don't remember the same comparison's coming out when conservative legislators were exposed for their various indiscretions - but I think ALL of us know that. It's just interesting to see Wayne still saying he doesn't always bring up Clinton in multiple threads, and then he brings Clinton up decades later... you just can't make it up... :SIB
................................................................

Lewinsky slurping Willy really got to DTBlackgumby in a way that cannot be explained.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,493
256
83
Victory Lane
Stepping up a simmering constitutional conflict, House Speaker John A. Boehner warned President Obama on Tuesday that unless he gets authorization from Congress for his military deployment in Libya, he will be in violation of the War Powers Resolution.

In a letter sent Tuesday afternoon, Mr. Boehner, the top Republican in the constitutional chain of succession, said Mr. Obama must provide a clear justification by Friday for committing troops to Libya.

Sunday marks the 90th day since the president notified Congress that U.S. troops had been committed to help enforce a no-fly zone over Libya, which is designed to protect the rebels fighting Col. Moammar Gadhafi?s government.

?The Constitution requires the president to ?take care that the laws be faithfully executed,? and one of those laws is the War Powers Resolution, which requires an approving action by Congress or withdrawal within 90 days from the notification of a military operation,? Mr. Boehner said in the letter.

The White House has repeatedly said it has complied with the law by alerting Congress to the initial deployment, and by testifying at more than 10 hearings and providing 30 follow-up briefings about the pace and extent of U.S. troops? commitment.

But the administration has never sought approval from Congress.

?We are in the final stages of preparing extensive information for the House and Senate that will address a whole host of issues about our ongoing efforts in Libya,? White House National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said Tuesday evening, adding that the administration also will present its legal analysis of the War Powers Resolution.
...............................................................

Boehner warns Obama


There is nothing that Boehner can do.

Come to think of it , what has Boehner done since November when the GOP took over the house and everyone said now we can make changes.

not jimmy chit is the answer.

not jimmy chit


its pathetic
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,424
128
63
Bowling Green Ky
12 years later... there has been turnover in congress (some)...
Clinton was termed out anyway (Weiner could stay forever)....
Plus there is a big difference in pushing out the leader of the free world (it almost was a free world back then, at least more so) for nickel and dime bullshit. Nobody on the world political or military scene gives a shit about 1 congressmen out of hundreds.

Those are the differences I see. I am sure there are others. :0003

That would be a valid point -thanks
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top