What difference does it make?

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
57
In the shadows
Scandal: Mass Media Censors Shocking Admission of Turkish False Flag

Corporate press brazenly lies about bombshell audio tape

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
March 28, 2014
The mainstream media has spun, mischaracterized and outright lied about a shocking leaked audio tape in which top Turkish military and political officials brazenly plan to stage a false flag attack on their own country in order to create a pretext for war on Syria.



Shocking details of dialogue between top Turkish officials reveals clear evidence of them scheming to launch a staged provocation against Turkish interests that would be blamed on Syria as a justification for military invasion.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan admitted the authenticity of the tape when he described the leaking of the audio as ?villainous? and ?immoral,? before moving to ban YouTube.

?I?ll make up a cause of war by ordering a missile attack on Turkey,? states Hakan Fidan, the head of Turkish intelligence.

?It?s a direct cause of war. I mean, what we?re going to do is a direct cause of war,? adds Deputy Chief of Military Staff Yasar Guler.

Plans to attack the Suleiman Shah Tomb, which is in Syria but considered Turkish territory and guarded by Turkish special forces, are also discussed, with Al-Qaeda terrorists playing the role of patsies.

?Prime Minister said that in current conjuncture, this attack (on Suleiman Shah Tomb) must be seen as an opportunity for us,? states Ahmet Davutoglu, the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

?We can also prepare an attack on Suleiman Shah Tomb if necessary,? responds Fidan.

?Listen, listen commander if it?s a pretext we?ll give you one. I?ll send over four men and have them fire eight rockets on an empty lot. That?s not the problem! Pretexts can be arranged,? adds Fidan.

Ambassador Feridun Sinirlioglu responds by asserting that the staged attack will have ?legitimacy? because it will be seen as a strike against Al-Qaeda and Turkey will have ?the whole world backing us?.

?If necessary, we?ll mount an attack against that place (Suleiman Shah Tomb),? states Fidan, adding, ?we?ll do the attack up front.?

To be clear, this confirmed audio tape represents ?caught red handed? concrete evidence of Turkish officials planning attacks on their own country to be blamed on Syria as a pretext for military invasion.

The officials also consider how the U.S. would react to the plan, fearing that it could backfire because Turkey may be perceived as weak due to its inability to protect its own interests.

Following yesterday?s bombshell revelation of the false flag plot, the mainstream media reacted in unison by ignoring the shocking content of the actual dialogue and instead making the story about how Erdogan banned YouTube, without specifically explaining why it was banned.

Innumerable news outlets euphemistically described the tape as containing discussions about plans for Turkish ?intervention? in Syria, mischaracterizing the context and censoring the fact that the tape was a brazen admission of high Turkish officials planning a staged provocation as a pretext to attack Syria.

Reuters even reported that the conversation, ?appeared to centre on a possible operation to secure the tomb of Suleyman Shah,? when in reality the conversation is about attacking the tomb, not securing it.

A BBC News report about the tape said it ?relates to a discussion of possible military operations in Syria,? completely omitting the fact that the tape is centered around Turkey attacking its own interests in a staged provocation.

A CNN report goes to great lengths in exploring how and why the audio tape was leaked while failing completely to mention its actual content.

An L.A. Times report states that the tape discusses ?possible military intervention in Syria?. Although the article quotes some portions of the tape, it completely omits key sections where Turkish officials admit they plan to launch false flag attacks.

Although a Washington Post article about the leaked tape prints the full transcript, the actual report mischaracterizes it by asserting, ?The officials mull whether to strike ? or even use ground troops ? against the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant, a jihadist group rooted in Syria.? The article fails to mention anything about Turkish officials planning to ?make up a cause for war? by launching an attack against their own country.

None of these major publications dared to reveal the actual core of the story ? that the tape contains bombshell revelations of Turkish military and political officials planning attacks on their own country as a casus belli for war on Syria.

Only USA Today somewhat accurately covered the story, reporting that the tape revealed, ?that top Turkey officials were plotting to fake an attack against their own country as an excuse to wage war on Turkey.?

Given Turkey?s NATO membership and its close ties with the United States, this scandal is at least on a par with the Benghazi stand down yet has received minimal and almost universally distorted media coverage given its staggering importance.



Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
57
In the shadows
CONFIRMED: NATO's Plans for False Flag Attack on Turkey Revealed
March 28, 2014 (Tony Cartalucci - LD) - It has been revealed that NATO has been planning a false flag attack against Turkey to justify the Turkish invasion of northern Syria, the International Business Times reported in its article, "Turkey YouTube Ban: Full Transcript of Leaked Syria 'War' Conversation Between Erdogan Officials."


Image: While the West obsesses solely on Turkey's ban of Twitter and Facebook in what it claims are attempts to "cover up corruption," in reality, leaks from the top of Turkish leadership revealed NATO's ongoing plans to carry out a false flag attack to trigger a destructive, premeditated war with neighboring Syria - in what appears to be one final, desperate gambit to steal victory in the West's proxy war against Damascus. (photo by Reuters)
It released the full transcript of a leaked conversation between the head of Turkish intelligence Hakan Fidan and Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu. The Times reported:
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ban of YouTube occurred after a leaked conversation between Head of Turkish Intelligence Hakan Fidan and Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu that he wanted removed from the video-sharing website.
The leaked call details Erdogan's thoughts that an attack on Syria "must be seen as an opportunity for us [Turkey]".
In the conversation, intelligence chief Fidan says that he will send four men from Syria to attack Turkey to "make up a cause of war".
Deputy Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Yaşar G?ler replies that Fidan's projected actions are "a direct cause of war...what you're going to do is a direct cause of war".
Turkey's foreign ministry said the leaked recording of top officials discussing the Syria operation was "partially manipulated" and is a "wretched attack" on national security.
In the leaked video, Fidan is discussing with Davutoğlu, G?ler and other officials a possible operation within Syria to secure the tomb of Suleyman Shah, grandfather of the founder of the Ottoman empire.
The Western media has purposefully obsessed myopically over Turkey's ban of Twitter and Facebook and leaks regarding "corruption," in an attempt to sidestep conversations revealing Turkey, a NATO member for decades, planning a false flag attack that would lead to an intentionally provoked war with neighboring Syria.

This comes as Turkey provides air support, logistics, and artillery cover for members of the US State Department designated terrorist group Al Nursa who have been leading an ongoing offensive from Turkish territory into Syria's northwestern province of Latakia.

Since the operation began days ago, Turkey has fired on and shot down a Syrian warplane that was targeting Al Nusra militants in Syrian territory. While Turkey claims the warplane violated Turkish airspace, the plane crashed in Syrian territory, and the pilot ejected and was recovered on Syrian soil. The incident has been used by Turkey to lay the rhetorical groundwork to further escalate tensions between Ankara and Damascus, most likely in an attempt to serve as an impetus for war instead of NATO's riskier false flag operation.

Turkey's belligerent posture in the north of Syria is matched by a joint US-Saudi offensive in the south, near the Syrian-Jordanian border city of Daraa. Called the "Southern Front," the offensive appears to already have been neutralized by Syrian security forces.

Regarding the creation of the ?Southern Front,? the US corporate-funded policy think tank, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, even stated in its post, ?Does the ?Southern Front? Exist?,? that:
Rather than an initiative from the rebels themselves, word is that it was foreign officials that called on rebel commanders to sign a statement declaring their opposition to extremism, saying it was a precondition for getting more guns and money. Since beggars can?t be choosers, the commanders then collectively shrugged their shoulders and signed?but not so much to declare a new alliance as to help U.S. officials tick all the right boxes in their reports back home, hoping that this would unlock another crate of guns.
With the "Southern Front" arriving on the battlefield stillborn, and NATO resorting to false flag attacks in blatant support of Al Qaeda-affiliated terror organizations, the West's desperation in what appears to be a strategic "last gasp" is palpable.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top